Theme: Governance

  • A Monarch=judge of Last Resort (not Monarchy = Government),

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:50 PM

    A monarch=judge of last resort (not monarchy = government), is the last line of defense against the fashions of the people. I’m sorry. Data is data. Evidence is evidence. If elizabeth could survive pulling the plug and restoring british sovereignty, (and she should be able to) then the political ambitions of the evil people in the world could easily be overcome.

  • A Monarch=judge of Last Resort (not Monarchy = Government),

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:50 PM

    A monarch=judge of last resort (not monarchy = government), is the last line of defense against the fashions of the people. I’m sorry. Data is data. Evidence is evidence. If elizabeth could survive pulling the plug and restoring british sovereignty, (and she should be able to) then the political ambitions of the evil people in the world could easily be overcome.

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments

    I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments. https://t.co/djdjXXF2Zd

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments

    I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/i-mean-our-presidency-has-failed-compared-to-both-monarchy-and-parliaments/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 16:20:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267128714988531715

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments.

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:53 PM I think this is the dumbest thing to argue with me about. I mean, our presidency has failed compared to both monarchy and parliaments. Our supreme court has failed more so than the house of lords. The whole purpose of rule of law and a monarch is to DENY PEOPLE POWER OVER OUR PEOPLE. What did democracy do? It created a means by which to obtain political power, and it created means of circumventing the market in the service of one another to do so. I … I just don’t understand some people. It’s fking obvious. Who is it that’s always harping on me about Schmidt and Authority needed for Exceptions? Or the utility of the Roman senate handing dictatorship to a general in time of war? I mean, wtf is wrong with people. We have a problem because hostile elite could undermine us and sieze power through a system that was WEAK.

  • I Mean, Our Presidency Has Failed Compared to Both Monarchy and Parliaments.

    Nov 15, 2019, 8:53 PM I think this is the dumbest thing to argue with me about. I mean, our presidency has failed compared to both monarchy and parliaments. Our supreme court has failed more so than the house of lords. The whole purpose of rule of law and a monarch is to DENY PEOPLE POWER OVER OUR PEOPLE. What did democracy do? It created a means by which to obtain political power, and it created means of circumventing the market in the service of one another to do so. I … I just don’t understand some people. It’s fking obvious. Who is it that’s always harping on me about Schmidt and Authority needed for Exceptions? Or the utility of the Roman senate handing dictatorship to a general in time of war? I mean, wtf is wrong with people. We have a problem because hostile elite could undermine us and sieze power through a system that was WEAK.

  • Because: Save Our Western Civilization Not Just The USA

    Nov 15, 2019, 9:05 PM 1) a country, confederacy, needs 1B people to concentrate enough military and research capital to compete in the world now. 2) usa 350m, uk 66m, ca 36m, au 24m, nz 5m = <500M and all naval. 3)”Real” europe is about 500M. And all continental. So that’s 1B. If we’re lucky. 4) Anglo civ can tolerate the correction. Continental can’t. It will collapse. 5) need to save UK, CA, and AU as well. Then it’s possible to save europe. In other words, we need the trade block,to make sure we all survive, and we need the lightest possible anchor tying us together,. 6) Every other monarchy, even internal, is less predictable. 7) would save the monarchy and help us restore monarchies across europe ensuring no ((())) takeover. (which is their strategy)

  • Because: Save Our Western Civilization Not Just The USA

    Nov 15, 2019, 9:05 PM 1) a country, confederacy, needs 1B people to concentrate enough military and research capital to compete in the world now. 2) usa 350m, uk 66m, ca 36m, au 24m, nz 5m = <500M and all naval. 3)”Real” europe is about 500M. And all continental. So that’s 1B. If we’re lucky. 4) Anglo civ can tolerate the correction. Continental can’t. It will collapse. 5) need to save UK, CA, and AU as well. Then it’s possible to save europe. In other words, we need the trade block,to make sure we all survive, and we need the lightest possible anchor tying us together,. 6) Every other monarchy, even internal, is less predictable. 7) would save the monarchy and help us restore monarchies across europe ensuring no ((())) takeover. (which is their strategy)

  • “Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. C

    —“Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. Causing more opportunities for theft via rent seeking.”—Ryan Williams

  • “Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. C

    —“Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. Causing more opportunities for theft via rent seeking.”—Ryan Williams