Theme: Governance

ACCELERATION? 2 things are happening simultaneously: 1) large numbers of additional nonwhites flow into the U.S. every year (70% of whom vote left & buy into anti-white commie narrative), and 2) more whites are getting redpilled to various degrees (harder to tell in what numbers). When we redpill whites, we’re mostly converting civnats (already Trump voters) and some centrists. Just making white men & their wives (the only demographic that votes majority right, & the only demographic that ever will) more based. This is absolutely essential because we need critical mass consensus on the grassroots Right around “no more nonwhite immigration”. However, we’re not really adding more Trump voters (just redpilling the current ones further). At least not nearly as fast as our enemy is importing leftist voters. Thus electoral politics in America is dead for the Right. It’s over. The system needs radical overhaul anyway. Good riddance, and the perfect opportunity to do so is coming. Thus the only question is, “What is the fastest way to get a critical mass of Trump voters to say ‘no more nonwhite immigration, period!’ – Trump winning in 2020, or losing? I could see an argument either way. If he wins, the race-realism-resistant magapedes will have their learning process delayed 4 more years. We’d likely avoid total censorship & the left will keep going nuts so that will help, but the resistance to race realism – the most important thing they must learn – could be even stronger (“See! We can still win elections! Go Candace Owens!”) If he loses, they will have to come to grips with why (nonwhites vote 70% left, even TX is going purple soon blue) 4 years sooner. Yes, the left will censor massively but that will work in our favor and even the mainstream Rush, Hannity etc will have to openly face the demographic reality of the Right winning no more elections. So I lean toward “let’s get this over with” but if Trump were to win in 2020 I won’t be upset. Either way we’re going to win. Because the acceleration will happen regardless, the demographic reality is coming regardless, and no matter what the timing of the acceleration, all acceleration benefits us because our enemies have no ability to project force to the extent necessary to control the grassroots Right once the grassroots Right has no more incentive to cooperate. Again, acceleration only helps us. Some of the anti-accelerationists are making the “later timing is better” argument. I don’t really have a problem with that. But some anti-accelerationists are hoping persuasion will work as an ultimate strategy and that somehow a real conflict can be avoided. (They’re just afraid. Or they haven’t done their homework on the scenario, 4G warfare etc. & thus they don’t understand that our enemy has no chance.) I do have a problem with that, because it’s delusional. The conflict is coming. Acceleration will come to a head. We are on a collision course with history. Just embrace it.

ACCELERATION? 2 things are happening simultaneously: 1) large numbers of additional nonwhites flow into the U.S. every year (70% of whom vote left & buy into anti-white commie narrative), and 2) more whites are getting redpilled to various degrees (harder to tell in what numbers). When we redpill whites, we’re mostly converting civnats (already Trump voters) and some centrists. Just making white men & their wives (the only demographic that votes majority right, & the only demographic that ever will) more based. This is absolutely essential because we need critical mass consensus on the grassroots Right around “no more nonwhite immigration”. However, we’re not really adding more Trump voters (just redpilling the current ones further). At least not nearly as fast as our enemy is importing leftist voters. Thus electoral politics in America is dead for the Right. It’s over. The system needs radical overhaul anyway. Good riddance, and the perfect opportunity to do so is coming. Thus the only question is, “What is the fastest way to get a critical mass of Trump voters to say ‘no more nonwhite immigration, period!’ – Trump winning in 2020, or losing? I could see an argument either way. If he wins, the race-realism-resistant magapedes will have their learning process delayed 4 more years. We’d likely avoid total censorship & the left will keep going nuts so that will help, but the resistance to race realism – the most important thing they must learn – could be even stronger (“See! We can still win elections! Go Candace Owens!”) If he loses, they will have to come to grips with why (nonwhites vote 70% left, even TX is going purple soon blue) 4 years sooner. Yes, the left will censor massively but that will work in our favor and even the mainstream Rush, Hannity etc will have to openly face the demographic reality of the Right winning no more elections. So I lean toward “let’s get this over with” but if Trump were to win in 2020 I won’t be upset. Either way we’re going to win. Because the acceleration will happen regardless, the demographic reality is coming regardless, and no matter what the timing of the acceleration, all acceleration benefits us because our enemies have no ability to project force to the extent necessary to control the grassroots Right once the grassroots Right has no more incentive to cooperate. Again, acceleration only helps us. Some of the anti-accelerationists are making the “later timing is better” argument. I don’t really have a problem with that. But some anti-accelerationists are hoping persuasion will work as an ultimate strategy and that somehow a real conflict can be avoided. (They’re just afraid. Or they haven’t done their homework on the scenario, 4G warfare etc. & thus they don’t understand that our enemy has no chance.) I do have a problem with that, because it’s delusional. The conflict is coming. Acceleration will come to a head. We are on a collision course with history. Just embrace it.