Theme: Governance

  • Fareed Zakaria, like Francis Fukuyama, are well meaning fools, intentionally or

    Fareed Zakaria, like Francis Fukuyama, are well meaning fools, intentionally or not, trying to use temporary american economic and military power inherited from the fall of the british empire, to pursue the cosmopolitain fantasy as justification for destruction of european civ. https://t.co/ass1mtbfEU

  • Fareed Zakaria, like Francis Fukuyama, are well meaning fools, intentionally or

    Fareed Zakaria, like Francis Fukuyama, are well meaning fools, intentionally or not, trying to use temporary american economic and military power inherited from the fall of the british empire, to pursue the cosmopolitain fantasy as justification for destruction of european civ. https://twitter.com/FreeRASnow/status/1269652418364690432

  • Yes. France is holding those colonies for financial reasons, and those financial

    Yes. France is holding those colonies for financial reasons, and those financial reasons are providing france with the incentive to tolerate and to advance african and muslimi integration into europe.

    So yes, france must return territories.
    (And all black people return to them?)

    Reply addressees: @DawitTe81324071

  • Yes. France is holding those colonies for financial reasons, and those financial

    Yes. France is holding those colonies for financial reasons, and those financial reasons are providing france with the incentive to tolerate and to advance african and muslimi integration into europe.

    So yes, france must return territories.
    (And all black people return to them?)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 16:04:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269661512072867845

    Reply addressees: @DawitTe81324071

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269169253518905345

  • RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. ;) Stop asking politicians to do the w

    RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. 😉 Stop asking politicians to do the w

    RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. 😉

    Stop asking politicians to do the work only we can do.
    Show up. https://t.co/JCEXDZqvRY

  • RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. ;) Stop asking politicians to do the w

    RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. 😉 Stop asking politicians to do the w

    RT @curtdoolittle: I love this messaging. 😉

    Stop asking politicians to do the work only we can do.
    Show up. https://t.co/JCEXDZqvRY


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 16:00:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269660517179719682

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @_Indirection @realDonaldTrump Why don’t y’all leave the thin

    RT @curtdoolittle: @_Indirection @realDonaldTrump Why don’t y’all leave the thinking to me ok? It’s not like there are other centrist, cons…

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @_Indirection @realDonaldTrump Why don’t y’all leave the thin

    RT @curtdoolittle: @_Indirection @realDonaldTrump Why don’t y’all leave the thinking to me ok? It’s not like there are other centrist, cons…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 16:00:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269660502000574466

  • NO ANARCHISM IS A FANTASY, RULE OF LAW IS NOT —“Which kind of Anarchist are we

    NO ANARCHISM IS A FANTASY, RULE OF LAW IS NOT

    —“Which kind of Anarchist are we talking about? There’s many varieties, though the most common, and commonly associated with the term, are Anarcho-Communists. The mental gymnastics required to create such an oxymoron as the combination of something that relies on the existence of a totalitarian government, and a total absence of government, makes it pretty obvious why it fails so damned always. Anatcho-Capitalists, of which I am a former supporter of, are extremely similar to Propertarians in many regards.”— Anon

    It doesn’t matter.

    All humans universally demonstrate the minimum moral constraint that they can get away with.

    People come together in proximity to reduce opportunity costs making the disproportionate returns on a division of labor possible.

    The state evolves universally to suppress local parasitism, centralize costs, in exchange for the reduction of transaction and opportunity costs.

    The use of taxation (fees for suppression free riding, socialization of losses, consumption of commons, parasitism and predation) to produce investments in the returns on commons (infrastructure, parks, etc) allows markets (polities) to compete with other polities for people, families, trade, investment, and those ‘top’ people who produce private excellences (mansions, shops) that as a consequence increase the returns on those commons.

    The only ‘anarchy’ is in the ‘borderlands’ where one benefits from free riding on the productivity of those markets but doesn’t pay the cost of behavioral, economic, tax, political, conformity to the standards of those commons. Thats why the Russians moved the jews into the pale. Thats where anarchic ‘ethics’ if you want to call them that, come from. Women depend on men, men depend on each other, and together they depend on the organization provided by court, military, and state. But anarchists, like children, like women, are oblivious to the fact that men are required to create their choices, just like anarchist require states to create their anarchies.

    That is why anarchies of any kind always exist in borderlands as subjects of states and empires.

    States tolerate borderlands because ‘border people’ give the state plausible deniability for territorial possession (keeping territorial stock in inventory) without bearing a cost of investment in commons political organization, or even much defense.

    Anarchic polities cannot compete to hold territory (scarce inventory) in competition with commons producers, since the returns on commons like the returns on cooperation and trade, are disproportionately advantageous.

    In other words, you can’t have commons for free. If you want anarchy you’re left with Alaska, Siberia, and the south pole at present. And it will only get worse.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 15:11:00 UTC

  • The Enemy’s Strategy

    [J]ust as Europeans use a deliberate strategy of sovereignty, reciprocity, testimonial speech, in adversarial competition, to discover the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and apply them to innovation, competition, and markets, using evidence, reason, empiricism, science, and mathematics, the enemy uses a deliberate strategy to destroy european civilization: The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal: Baiting into Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy. This techniqu reflects he female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyper-consumption. A list the false promises of the enemy? It’s a long list. In the modern world alone, it’s Marxism, communism socialism, cosmopolitanism, universalism, one-world government, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denial, and political correctness. Together those movements are a conspiracy to destroy our western civilization – our civilization that both discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and in doing so dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, and disease, in a few hundred years in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is oppressive – where all other civilizations, have, or are, running down the opportunity-clock, have either stagnated or declined, because they have failed to discover and adhere to physical, natural, and evolutionary law. Just as primitive man anthropomorphizes natural phenomena, creates animistic religion, and women, Jews, use the Alinsky of method of personalizing a political position, by the strategy of ‘personalize white civilization for their primitivism: a rejection of physical natural and evolutionary laws. We are in the process of the second semitic dark age – just as the jews brought the false promises of monotheism to the empire and destroyed the institutions, religion, temples, academies, knowledge, arts, of the ancient european world, and the Muslims destroyed the same of the great civilizations of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, the Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, northwest India, Anatolia, and eventually Byzantium. That is the complete understanding of our current crisis: the war by the middle east primitives, led by their ((( intellectual ))) class’s verbal advantage, to destroy civilization. They are not happy to cause stagnation. They are not happy to cause decline. They are not happy to run down the clock in this brief period of geological, solar, galactic peace, in a universe increasingly evidently hostile to advanced life. Given the evidence of the consistency of the technique, in the ancient, medieval, and modern worlds – each and every time we have let them among us – whether their destruction of civilization is a genetic intuition, a cultural habit, or intentional design, or all of the above. But it doesn’t matter. Plausible deniability is lost. One cannot specialize in undermining cooperation within a people, fomenting rebellion by those lacking agency, with sophisticated deceits that promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by personalizing those that follow physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and fail to reform without genetic interests, cultural habituation, of intentional strategy any more than europeans can do so with their adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. We have a choice: to continue to be the only civilization that discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and raises mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death, or to fail like all other peoples, stagnate, and decline, because our men lacked the will to save our people, and by consequence our race, and by consequence mankind, and by consequence, our opportunity to evolve into the gods we imagined.