So you would have to defeat my argument that decidabiity that would limit externalities is available to us, even in sport where outcomes are substantive at least in monetary reward if not status and externalities – at the cost of better rules and judges ‘refs’.
Theme: Externalities
-
So you would have to defeat my argument that decidabiity that would limit extern
So you would have to defeat my argument that decidabiity that would limit externalities is available to us, even in sport where outcomes are substantive at least in monetary reward if not status and externalities – at the cost of better rules and judges ‘refs’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-31 03:46:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620267332588412928
Reply addressees: @WantsNGoetz @aaron_soule @nacholeber
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620265110173532160
-
( p) So drugs, gambling, loansharking, prostitution, porn, onlyfans, hookup apps
( p) So drugs, gambling, loansharking, prostitution, porn, onlyfans, hookup apps, commercial scams, private finance insured by public funds, profit from rent-seeking and corruption, sedition and war against institutions of cultural production(marxist=to=woke) are AGGRESSIONS.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:40:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620144862254465025
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616
-
(m) The most common crime and one that libertarianism was ‘invented’ to exploit,
(m) The most common crime and one that libertarianism was ‘invented’ to exploit, is a violation of reciprocity that includes baiting into hazard, where the hazard could impose costs on the individual, familial, social, investment, and their externalities.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:34:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620143364996993026
Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616
-
This is true of all social, economic, political, and group evolutionary science.
This is true of all social, economic, political, and group evolutionary science. The positives are irrelevant because they will be discovered by the market or funded voluntarily, if and only with the suppression of irreciprocity in all its forms against capital in all its forms. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1617314464168026114
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-23 00:14:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1617314818096091140
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1617314464168026114
-
Do *TO *your property vs *WITH* vs *ON* your property. There is no right of harm
Do *TO *your property vs *WITH* vs *ON* your property. There is no right of harming property, because you stick your neighbors, those who live after you, and the polity and the government with the f—-king mess you made. What’s the recovery cost for cleaning up his disaster?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-17 21:47:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615465828723617795
Reply addressees: @TinhaloDotCom @Historya2zM
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1610330972410494976
-
Trade is can can be conducted by “baiting into hazard” or organized crime to the
Trade is can can be conducted by “baiting into hazard” or organized crime to the benfit of the community at the expense of hosts.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-16 13:06:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1614972249559252993
Reply addressees: @komintern_kong @nathancofnas @TOOEdit
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1614897493988319233
-
Ask East Asians. Appears so. At some point the trade off (like intelligence beyo
Ask East Asians. Appears so. At some point the trade off (like intelligence beyond 140’s, or systematizing into autism, or empathizing into solipsism) produces negative externalities.
Story of the three bears: “Just Right” is at the golden mean. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-15 17:27:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1614675643924447233
Reply addressees: @bennylloyd102 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1614651709212749827
-
It is extremely difficult to obtain wealth without trustworthy cooperation with
It is extremely difficult to obtain wealth without trustworthy cooperation with others. AFAICT misbehavior among the wealthy is due to externalities and human error. BUT the ambitious and not-yet-wealthy esp in law and finance never cease to amaze me with questionable ethics.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 13:23:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613889370649411584
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1611640814790131713
-
Because your actions are an imposition of costs under the pretense of knowledge.
Because your actions are an imposition of costs under the pretense of knowledge. I’m arguing not only with the the sophistry of your prose but the criminality of your social construction, and victimization of me by imposing it’s cost on me as an attempt.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-11 22:30:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613302384242958336
Reply addressees: @ThymeMatterof @kirkstroller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613301473424596993