Theme: Externalities

  • What is the difference between robbing your neighbors every year, and having a c

    What is the difference between robbing your neighbors every year, and having a child that you require your neighbors to support every year?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 19:22:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665248283388944384

  • Cheaper under full accounting? I think it would fail that test

    http://www.xenosystems.net/sentences-29/Um. Cheaper under full accounting? I think it would fail that test.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-08 13:23:00 UTC

  • The Great Decoupling, and The Influence of Internatioanl Firms In Creating Local Inequality

    (RE: http://andrewmcafee.org/2012/12/the-great-decoupling-of-the-us-economy/ )

    chart19813-650x443

    [I]nformation is the model for both natural and social sciences. If wages for labor rose in the industrial era and are declining in the information era then those prices (wages) are telling us something. If wages for problem solvers was limited in the era of concentrated capital (early industry), and is expanding in the era of distributed capital between temporary alliances of firms – then we should see increasing wages where capital is concentrated and decreasing wages where distributed.

    So instead of internationally wealthy and poor countries we also have internationally wealthy and poor firms and a decoupling of the previous dependence on the local state. And we have a declining wage for anyone not in a firm able to concentrate capital.  The influence of local economy on global companies must decline. And to make matters worse, capital today is available at zero cost. So the only marginally competitive value is in human beings marginally superior to other human beings. Meaning that human capital  – the high end of ability – is increasingly important and labor decreasingly important. Technological man is the scarce resource(genetics). High trust is the scarce political environment(culture). The industrial era was an outlier. Farming went from a good business in 1830, to a terrible business in 1930. Industrial labor is following farming. And white collar labor is close behind. Hence Propertarianism tells me that we must pay off the unemployable to maintain the commons, and decrease their numbers
  • The Great Decoupling, and The Influence of Internatioanl Firms In Creating Local Inequality

    (RE: http://andrewmcafee.org/2012/12/the-great-decoupling-of-the-us-economy/ )

    chart19813-650x443

    [I]nformation is the model for both natural and social sciences. If wages for labor rose in the industrial era and are declining in the information era then those prices (wages) are telling us something. If wages for problem solvers was limited in the era of concentrated capital (early industry), and is expanding in the era of distributed capital between temporary alliances of firms – then we should see increasing wages where capital is concentrated and decreasing wages where distributed.

    So instead of internationally wealthy and poor countries we also have internationally wealthy and poor firms and a decoupling of the previous dependence on the local state. And we have a declining wage for anyone not in a firm able to concentrate capital.  The influence of local economy on global companies must decline. And to make matters worse, capital today is available at zero cost. So the only marginally competitive value is in human beings marginally superior to other human beings. Meaning that human capital  – the high end of ability – is increasingly important and labor decreasingly important. Technological man is the scarce resource(genetics). High trust is the scarce political environment(culture). The industrial era was an outlier. Farming went from a good business in 1830, to a terrible business in 1930. Industrial labor is following farming. And white collar labor is close behind. Hence Propertarianism tells me that we must pay off the unemployable to maintain the commons, and decrease their numbers
  • ON THE FALLACY OF FREE TRADE ABSOLUTISM (very important piece) (this will ruffle

    ON THE FALLACY OF FREE TRADE ABSOLUTISM

    (very important piece) (this will ruffle some feathers)

    The three means of coercion can be used for good or ill.

    1) Violence can be used to create property rights and prosperity or it can be used to conduct parasitism predation and destruction.

    2) Gossip can be used to reward contributors to the commons with opportunity for cooperation and mates, or it can be used to lie, cheat, deceive, rally, shame, and justify parasitism, or instill violence.

    3) Trade can be used to increase prosperity for all by accumulating genetic, knowledge, physical and institutional capital, or to destroy the either the producer’s or the consumer’s economy by causing the depreciation of genetic, knowledge, physical, and institutional capital.

    Trade is no more an INTRINSIC good, than is violence or gossip.

    That is the end of it. Trade is nor more a good than violence or gossip. The only determinant of the morality or immorality of trade is whether capital is accumulated or destroyed in the process of production, distribution, trade and consumption, and whether the transfers were voluntary.

    ***This is what I call the requirement for “full accounting” in any truthful (moral) argument. Without full accounting someone is undoubtably lying. General rules expressed without limits are used as means of suggestion by which to deceive the altruistic mind. Free Trade is as much a folly as Autarky. Free Trade is yet another cosmopolitanism by which to rely on suggestion in order to conduct parasitism.***

    This argument is finished. Cosmopolitan Libertarian absolutism is finished. Libertine libertarianism is finished. It is a dead ideology. I have killed it – forever. And I have demonstrated as thoroughly as any man can, that the only possible liberty from which we obtain our prosperity is TRUTHFUL COOPERATION: The productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange of property-en-toto, free of imposition of costs by externality, wherein our statements survive tests of identity (non conflation), internal, consistency, external correspondence, existential possibility, parsimony, limits, full accounting, and voluntary exchange.

    Children require virtue ethics, because they can but imitate. The young require rule ethics because they lack experience. The adult requires outcome ethics because otherwise he can use rules to obscure his frauds. Any ethical claim must hold to all THREE forms of ethic:

    a) virtue: should every man do this, the outcome would be moral

    b) rule: should every man obey this rule, the outcome would be moral.

    c) outcome: should every man do this, the outcome would be moral.

    It is not that one ethical method supersedes any other. It is that we can only expect the child to imitate, the young to obey rules, and the old to obey experience. As such we tolerate greater error from the child, than the young, and least from the experienced. It is not that any ethical method produces greater results. It is that each method requires making full use of the knowledge that each actor possesses, and that as long as he acts according to those principles, that we forgive him for his failures.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kyiv, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-06 09:30:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle You, by virtue of you occupation create a dense gathering of peop

    Curt Doolittle

    You, by virtue of you occupation create a dense gathering of people that exposes them to risk but which you profit from. Since you can learn to be sufficiently competent with a handgun in just a few lessons, failing to do it is just an excuse not to take responsibility for the defence of the citizenry. As such it is hard to argue that you reap the extraordinary rewards of this society without paying the only cost of enfranchisement: it’s defense.

    Cowardice is merely taking an unearned discount.

    That’s all it is.

    Free riding.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-13 14:04:00 UTC

  • ARISTOCRACY AND COOPERATION ***Cooperation is only superior to conquest because

    ARISTOCRACY AND COOPERATION

    ***Cooperation is only superior to conquest because of externalities it produces. We are competitors. Evolution determines winners – not that we enjoy our experience.***

    (for my Nietzschian friends: this ought to state my position clearly.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-13 04:32:00 UTC

  • Property is not a moral or legal absolute, but imposition of costs *is*. #nrx #t

    Property is not a moral or legal absolute, but imposition of costs *is*. #nrx #tlot #tcot http://www.propertarianism.com/ufD3Z


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-07 12:03:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629623808912138240

  • Property Absolutism is Objectively Immoral

    (important) [P]roperty-Absolutism violates the truth test of Full Accounting under Testimonialism; whereas the Non-Imposition of Costs does not. As such Property-Absolutism in Cosmopolitan Libertinism is a falsehood: a deceit for the purposes of theft, that forces retaliation, and violates the prohibition on the imposition of costs that makes rational cooperation preferable to predation.

    Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
  • Property Absolutism is Objectively Immoral

    (important) [P]roperty-Absolutism violates the truth test of Full Accounting under Testimonialism; whereas the Non-Imposition of Costs does not. As such Property-Absolutism in Cosmopolitan Libertinism is a falsehood: a deceit for the purposes of theft, that forces retaliation, and violates the prohibition on the imposition of costs that makes rational cooperation preferable to predation.

    Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)