Curt Doolittle

Theme: Externalities

  • Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and

    Fascism was an attempt to solve both the cancer of communism by intentions, and the cancer of capitalism by externality.

  • Every single act of respecting (meaning, not privatizing) other’s property is a

    Every single act of respecting (meaning, not privatizing) other’s property is a forgone opportunity. A cost born. A tax. Every privatization a theft not only from the owner, but from all those who have forgone such opportunities and paid the tax of forgone opportunity. We pay for the normative commons, and it is this normative commons that other civilizations do NOT pay, that has been our competitive difference in the three eras of man’s domestication.

  • Every single act of respecting (meaning, not privatizing) other’s property is a

    Every single act of respecting (meaning, not privatizing) other’s property is a forgone opportunity. A cost born. A tax. Every privatization a theft not only from the owner, but from all those who have forgone such opportunities and paid the tax of forgone opportunity. We pay for the normative commons, and it is this normative commons that other civilizations do NOT pay, that has been our competitive difference in the three eras of man’s domestication.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-11 12:58:00 UTC

  • So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.

    So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations.

  • So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.

    So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:06:00 UTC

  • So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics.

    So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations.

  • All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy

    All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy produces the optimum externalities despite our consent with them. We do not consent with nature. We defeat it.

  • All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy

    All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy produces the optimum externalities despite our consent with them.

    We do not consent with nature. We defeat it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-06 11:26:00 UTC

  • All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy

    All philosophies are class philosophies. The question is which class philosophy produces the optimum externalities despite our consent with them. We do not consent with nature. We defeat it.

  • Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, tha

    Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, that are limited to productive externalities, without possibility of competition or even criticism since any criticism of rule of law of reciprocity can only consist of fraud or deceit. If fascism means “prohibition on political competition” then that is in fact ‘rule of law under reciprocity’. Nationalism and limited socialism are both possible and necessary under such market constraints (really). As such I see the term ‘fascism’ as meaning nothing other than non-competitition in political order, leaving open the question of how such a political order is managed. From my understanding, the optimum means of providing rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, markets for goods, services, and information, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (family), production, is a monarchy as justice of of last resort, an independent judiciary, a universal militia, and if small enough, the discretionary production of commons by the monarchy. And if too large, the creation of a market for commons between the classes wherein each house is limited to those members who have demonstrated success prior to access. The the house of dependents, the house of families, the house of commerce, the house of militia (military), the house of law (judiciary) with the judiciary, military, and Monarchy holding only veto power.

    In that sense, I am a fascist: all political competition against the natural law of reciprocity is either fraud or war.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-27 10:28:00 UTC