Theme: Externalities

  • RT @BasedTorba: Yes, a $20 toaster from overseas is cheap—until you factor in th

    RT @BasedTorba: Yes, a $20 toaster from overseas is cheap—until you factor in the billions spent on welfare for displaced workers, the opio…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-05 18:03:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1908581211951579466

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: Everyone who benefits from offshoring production and provisio

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: Everyone who benefits from offshoring production and provision to countries with lower regulatory burdens to capture low…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 19:52:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907883901248483489

  • Speak for yourself. Externalities of High IQ make possible the existence of the

    Speak for yourself. Externalities of High IQ make possible the existence of the rest.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-01-04 23:56:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875692759606292891

    Reply addressees: @IterIntellectus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1875384285664100746

  • externalities

    externalities.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-30 14:41:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873741313017102581

    Reply addressees: @danbrusca @Timcast

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873730124983742483

  • And FWIW: My criticism that you’re doing the same as the libertarians still stan

    And FWIW: My criticism that you’re doing the same as the libertarians still stands. The universe is constraint based not will based. And pragmatisms that cause the externalization of costs, unless the enemy is defeated and exterminated are simply debts that will manifest as retributions over time whether directly by those in conflict, or indirectly by those who wish to prevent a repetition. To state otherwise is a failure of full accounting.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-18 20:22:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869478271940952064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869473920958783995

  • Not sure why you don’t grasp that like libertarians you’re presuming you have th

    Not sure why you don’t grasp that like libertarians you’re presuming you have the choice of moral utility or preference independent of externalities that determine its limits. Immorality exists as universally demonstrated behavior, and therefore morality exists as a universal description of human behavior. Like all scientific propositions you may choose to pay the costs and obtain the benefits of bending or violating those laws in order to achieve a utilitarian end. But you will pay those costs. The trade off is just a matter of choice. That does not mean morality is relative between polities any more than it means morality is relative between individuals in a polity. It means morality, moral utility, and moral preference describe a spectrum of from science to applies science.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:03:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868386334848774144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868383363989479509

  • Not quite. Through insurance, we pay for redistribution of costs. Yes really. Th

    Not quite. Through insurance, we pay for redistribution of costs. Yes really. That’s why.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-05 21:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864784604240171293

    Reply addressees: @JamesSurowiecki

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864723118117310676

  • Two sided coin. Maximum velocity, innovation, adaptation, and production of comm

    Two sided coin. Maximum velocity, innovation, adaptation, and production of commons reducing costs for all, while creating vulnerability for abuses of that system by hostiles. (You know who)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-04 19:35:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864393228470112500

    Reply addressees: @AllDeadPrezzys

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864386581768941612

  • FOLLOWUP TO COSTS Now that we have that out of the way. Governments can attempt

    FOLLOWUP TO COSTS
    Now that we have that out of the way. Governments can attempt to accelerate the production of informal and formal commons that will achieve these cost reductions. However the negative affects compound with the number of people and degree of authority necessary to alter the behavior of the population – ie: secret police are a really bad idea but they work in the short term.

    The solution for all polites is develop a nationalist military with greater alliance to the common good than to the family or clan, and once this is produced, use the same people to gradually produce rule of law by the natural law until the rest of the polity adapts out of simple self interest.

    Until you create nationalism you cannot create the absence of corruption necessary for a high trust polity that is in turn necessary for the prosperity that produces that reduction of risk and increase in choice that all peoples desire.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @PolybiusOfNorth


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-07 17:22:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854575228426534912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854559349445722286

  • WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO: (Costs) Oh. So at eight o’clock in the morning, before I’ve

    WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO: (Costs)

    Oh. So at eight o’clock in the morning, before I’ve finished my first cup of coffee, you want me to answer a really hard question? lol 😉

    Here:

    Effectively, all governments maximize the use of existing technology to monitor and regulate the behavior of all citizens the the point of diminishing returns and then into burdensome costs that reverse the utility of centralizing costs (government) for the purpose of suppressing the hierarchy and network of rents (frictions) that occur in its absence.

    This is a universal law of government behavior. Governments suppress the hierarchy of rents (unearned takings on the work of others) in exchange for producing monetary and trade velocity, reducing transaction and risk costs (and the many other costs).

    It’s this reduction in costs that makes economies capable of producing trust in a complex division of labor over longer and more complex production cycles.

    It’s hard for we humans to think in the ‘via negativa’ like this – but we can understand that we can think in gaining knowledge (positiva) or removing ignorance (negativa). The same is true in economies. We can think in terms of facilitating trust and cooperation or removing costs that impeded trust and cooperation.

    Just for yucks, here is a hierarchical list of costs that people, polities, and governments can seek to reduce in order to create prosperity:

    1. Transaction Costs (Immediate, Perceptible)
    Costs of negotiating, executing, and enforcing agreements. These include direct expenses like fees and the time spent on bargaining.
    2. Opportunity Costs (Immediate, Perceptible)
    The value of the next best alternative foregone when making a decision. These are often felt as a direct trade-off in resource allocation.
    3. Information Costs
    Costs of obtaining, processing, and verifying necessary information for decision-making, including research and communication overhead.
    4. Coordination Costs
    Costs of aligning efforts, goals, and activities among individuals or organizations to ensure smooth execution.
    5. Compliance and Regulatory Costs
    Costs associated with meeting legal, regulatory, or internal policy requirements, such as audits, documentation, or legal counsel.
    6. Switching Costs
    Costs incurred when changing suppliers, technologies, or operational dependencies. These can be tangible (training, setup) or intangible (loss of integration benefits).
    7. Agency Costs
    Costs arising from conflicts of interest between principals and agents, including monitoring, incentivizing, or resolving misaligned objectives.
    8. Adaptation Costs
    Costs of adjusting operations, strategies, or resources in response to external changes such as market shifts, regulations, or technological advancements.
    9. Sunk Costs
    Costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Though economically irrelevant for future decisions, they often psychologically influence actors.
    10. Redundancy and Buffer Costs
    Costs of maintaining excess capacity or resources as insurance against uncertainty or risk.
    11. Complexity Costs
    Costs that arise from managing increasingly intricate systems or processes, leading to inefficiencies and reduced agility.
    12. Intertemporal Costs
    Costs resulting from decisions that affect future states, such as delayed investment returns or the erosion of future options due to present commitments.
    13. Externality Costs
    Costs or benefits imposed on third parties due to an economic activity, often unnoticed or unaccounted for by the primary actors.
    14. Cultural and Social Capital Costs (Remote, Imperceptible)
    Costs associated with building, maintaining, or repairing trust, reputation, and relationships, which are crucial but often difficult to quantify or perceive immediately.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @PolybiusOfNorth


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-07 17:16:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854573617511907328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854559349445722286