—“Evidence will be presented to demonstrate that Proto-Indo-European is the result of the imposition of a Eurasiatic language on a population speaking one or more primordial Northwest Caucasian languages.”—
Language is a Technology
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-19 07:30:00 UTC
http://www.thelocal.se/20150513/hans-rosling-im-an-ambassador-for-the-world-in-sweden-connectsweden-tlccuDISHONEST, IDIOT OR GENETICALLY DEFECTIVE?
He is a typical product of defective north sea genes, which were very useful in the ice age and thereafter, but where status seeking by pathological altruism is suicidal when competing with more aggressive and parasitic tribes.
2 mins · Like
Curt Doolittle To call the man an idiot is to call a woman with solipsistic feminine intuition an idiot. We justify our genetic biases all life long. He is justifying his. He is no more wise or informed than his genes allow him to be. So, he’s just wrong, and morally blind because he is genetically predisposed to moral blindness.
All his world travels manage to do is demonstrate the ferocity of his genetic bias, in the face of overwhelming evidence against his bias.
He’s a poster child for the reason democracy is impossible.
#propertarianism
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-18 07:22:00 UTC
THE GENETIC BIAS OF NORT SEA EUROPEANS: PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM
Pathological Altruism as a means of suppressing free riding.
I am pretty sure that I’ve nailed the theory of western exceptionalism. It’s probably partly genetic. But that’s not material. What’s material is that it can be codified in law, regardless of genetics.
Truth is a means of suppressing free riding.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-15 02:41:00 UTC
A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER
The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure
Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.
The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition
There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:
1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)
2) All property is private (all property is earned)
3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.
4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.
5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally.
6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.
The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.
The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives
As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population.
The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.
In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.
The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.
Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.
It’s all rational really.
WHAT IS HAPPENING
The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.
The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.
We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)
The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.
The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.
So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.
A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER
The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure
Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.
The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition
There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:
1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)
2) All property is private (all property is earned)
3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.
4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.
5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally.
6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.
The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.
The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives
As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population.
The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.
In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.
The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.
Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.
It’s all rational really.
WHAT IS HAPPENING
The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.
The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.
We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)
The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.
The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.
So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.
DEMOGRAPHICS OF GUN OWNERSHIP: A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER
The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure
Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.
The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition
There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:
1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)
2) All property is private (all property is earned)
3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.
4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.
5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally.
6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.
The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.
The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives
As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population.
The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.
In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.
The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.
Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.
It’s all rational really.
WHAT IS HAPPENING
The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.
The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.
We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)
The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.
The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.
So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-10 11:23:00 UTC
MORE ON MY POSITION ON RACE
(from elsewhere)
Just maybe let me add this: there is no material difference between men. There is a material difference in how groups of men behave because there are material differences in the distributions between groups of men. I feel that evolution via mutation is less impactful than changes in who breeds at what rate. This means that man is very plastic in adaptation, always able to move forward into the cerebral or backward into the physical as necessary. The central problem of any society is the PERCENTAGE of individuals above 125/130 where ideas are created, and how much property is in their hands, and the nearest 20% of people that they influence. This is how institutions and organizations are formed. It is imperative that any group of people achieve the Pareto relationship between order and ability if one wants to exit tyranny. I do not believe there are material differences between people of similar abilities. I believe that there are material differences in the distribution of abilities. If you let your lower classes over-reproduce, you cannot accumulate wealth in the hands of meritocracy. I do not think this is particularly difficult or complex to understand. We are all families at different stages of maturity. I think that we should treat our families, extended families, distant relations, and other races as families who are at different levels of maturity, but that there is no meaningful difference otherwise. This is my position. Racism is stupid. Democracy makes it worse. All families can help other families however.I choose to help all families who wish to improve their lot without doing it at the expense of Others.
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 09:05:00 UTC
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/04/christianity-and-the-ethnic-suicide-of-the-west/
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-07 14:46:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2015-05-07 11:34:00 UTC
[I] hate discussion of race really, but since my position is somewhat novel, I feel the need to vent my frustration at what I see as a the result of a series of mainstream errors that attempt to justify democracy by criticizing the natural and unavoidable behavior of man. Instead of truthfully addressing the issue, we lie and try to convince each other of the lie. It doesn’t work. Religion works because you can’t see any evidence other than people’s behavior. Criticisms of race don’t work because we can always see evidence of group behavior.
Race: Demonstrated behavior in favor of kin selection; most commonly performed as some form of ostracization by means of (a) physical and legal, (b) boycott of commerce and cooperation, (c) gossip and ridicule.
So, the whole debate over race is a dishonest postmodern byproduct of the fallacy of democracy. People will never stop favoring kin selection in politics or any other walk of life. Race is extremely valuable to the middle and lower classes, even if almost entirely irrelevant to the upper classes. The margins will always interbreed because it’s to their status advantage if not their offspring’s.
THE PROBLEM IS DEMOCRATIC JUSTIFICATION OF EMPIRES
Democratic empires like the USA and Europe are a catastrophe that makes hostility between of families with different abilities, needs and wants. Representative Democracy is an obscurant technology similar to overloading in rhetoric, pooling and laundering in money and finance, platonism in mathematics, and morality in politics. Democracy obscures, and justifies, because it is only possible to employ in the consideration of particulars, and NOT in the consideration of sets of decisions. Especially when the particulars within each set of decisions provides incentives for corruption, contrivance, and deceit.
There isn’t necessarily any problem with direct democracy on normative matters, and economic democracy on investment matters. There just isn’t. The problem with direct democracy is no longer one of practicality, but one of the impossibility of common interest.
THE PROPERTARIAN ARGUMENT:
The only material difference between the races is the rates of reproduction of the underclasses. This problem was solved in the west by marriage, manorialism and harsh winters if not plagues, and in the east through starvation and political killing of even the most marginal of malcontents. It was marginally solved by the hindus via the caste system, while muslims, and africans had no means of solving it at all. Thankfully, in modernity it can be solved through redistribution in exchange for one child limits, rather than through starvation and extermination. We can pay people NOT to commit the crime of parasitic reproduction, rather than punish them and the innocent for parasitic reproduction.
The only significant political difference between races is merely one of distributions.
Without this difference in distributions, we would have very few political problems between the races of man.
(NOTE: I suppose I should diagram this argument as a set of demand curves for desirability as mates, group insurance value, and IQ/Impulsivity. I haven’t really spent much time demonstrating propertarianism using Austrian ‘triangles’ – or, more appropriately: multi-dimensional demand curves. But the world needs such a thing. And needs it desperately.)