Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Aristocracy (Advocacy), Not Racism (Criticism)

    [R]ace debate is not helpful to anyone. Aristocracy is. Culling your herd (tribe) will produce a universal aristocracy regardless of race. We, the Chinese and the European Jews have been the best at culling our herds. The other civilizations simply haven’t been successful at culling their tribes. I don’t see differences in races of homo-sapiens other than reproductive value, and distribution of talents. And the distribution of talents is a function of thefailure to suppress the lower classes from reproducing.

    That’s it. I don’t care about the color of your skin so much as I care about the distribution of talents in your family. You are either successful at improving your family or you are not. If you are not then your aristocracy is a failure. The alternative is just to breed as many of the worst as possible and use the export of your bad genes as a weapon. Which is what the muslim world is doing.
  • #SignsYoureRightWing “You confuse heritage with hate”, Or do we understand super

    #SignsYoureRightWing “You confuse heritage with hate”, Or do we understand superior versus inferior, and conquest versus tolerance?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 16:09:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628598751700086785

  • ARISTOCRACY NOT RACISM Race is not helpful to anyone. Aristocracy is. Culling yo

    ARISTOCRACY NOT RACISM

    Race is not helpful to anyone. Aristocracy is. Culling your herd (tribe) will produce a universal aristocracy regardless of race. We, the Chinese and the European Jews have been the best at culling our herds. The other civilizations simply haven’t been successful at culling their tribes.

    I don’t see differences in races of homo-sapiens other than reproductive value, and distribution of talents. And the distribution of talents is a function of the failure to suppress the lower classes from reproducing.

    That’s it.

    I don’t care about the color of your skin so much as I care about the distribution of talents in your family. You are either successful at improving your family or you are not. If you are not then your aristocracy is a failure.

    The alternative is just to breed as many of teh worst as possible and use the export of your bad genes as a weapon.

    Which is what the muslim world is doing.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-03 07:44:00 UTC

  • Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Emp

    Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Empirical): We argue in the languages of our ancestors. #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:23:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627786723309813760

  • Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Emp

    Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Empirical): We argue in the languages of our ancestors. #tcot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:22:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627786661775179776

  • Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Emp

    Hoppe (German Rational), Curtis Yarvin(Jewish Critical), and Doolittle(Anglo Empirical): We argue in the languages of our ancestors. #NRx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:22:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627786565679480832

  • Our Inescapable Cultural Biases

    THE PERSISTENCE OF ENLIGHTENMENT CULTURAL BIAS IN PHILOSOPHY
    (anarchism, neo-reaction, testimonialism)

    [C]urtis Yarvin kinda did the Jewish thing: rhetorically loaded criticism (gossip).

    Hans Hoppe kinda did the German thing: rational justification of moral priors.

    Doolittle (that’s me), I kinda did the Anglo thing: science and law.

    –“Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation..”—

    So true. We are just reminders in the algorithm that we call our cultural traditions. Free will? Maybe.

    But I feel like I’m a tiny rider on the elephant of Indo-European, Anglo Saxon, and Norman traditions.

    Curt Doolittle

  • Our Inescapable Cultural Biases

    THE PERSISTENCE OF ENLIGHTENMENT CULTURAL BIAS IN PHILOSOPHY
    (anarchism, neo-reaction, testimonialism)

    [C]urtis Yarvin kinda did the Jewish thing: rhetorically loaded criticism (gossip).

    Hans Hoppe kinda did the German thing: rational justification of moral priors.

    Doolittle (that’s me), I kinda did the Anglo thing: science and law.

    –“Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation..”—

    So true. We are just reminders in the algorithm that we call our cultural traditions. Free will? Maybe.

    But I feel like I’m a tiny rider on the elephant of Indo-European, Anglo Saxon, and Norman traditions.

    Curt Doolittle

  • Aristocracy is Good For Every Tribe.

    [A]ristocracy is good for every tribe. Every single one. So, I don’t do racism. I don’t want to complain about others. I want to defend against bad tribes. So I just don’t sacrifice for other tribes. Only my own. I love my tribe. Every lunatic one of us.  I will cooperate with other tribes, by not preying upon them.  But I will not sacrifice my tribe for others. COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY Agreeing not to prey upon you is different from subsidising you. To cooperate requires I do not prey upon you. Using the State for purposes of transferring from me against my will to you is just predation. So if you will use the state for predation upon my family then in turn I am free to prey upon you and yours. So the only choice is mutual non-predation.

  • Aristocracy is Good For Every Tribe.

    [A]ristocracy is good for every tribe. Every single one. So, I don’t do racism. I don’t want to complain about others. I want to defend against bad tribes. So I just don’t sacrifice for other tribes. Only my own. I love my tribe. Every lunatic one of us.  I will cooperate with other tribes, by not preying upon them.  But I will not sacrifice my tribe for others. COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY Agreeing not to prey upon you is different from subsidising you. To cooperate requires I do not prey upon you. Using the State for purposes of transferring from me against my will to you is just predation. So if you will use the state for predation upon my family then in turn I am free to prey upon you and yours. So the only choice is mutual non-predation.