Theme: Ethnoculture

  • (I don’t see christian africans of any continent as competitors but allies. I do

    (I don’t see christian africans of any continent as competitors but allies. I don’t see jews as competitors but dependents. I see Russians, muslims, Chinese as competitors if not outright enemies. )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-07 08:24:00 UTC

  • Human tribes are no more equal than breeds of dogs are equal. Sorry. Just how it

    Human tribes are no more equal than breeds of dogs are equal. Sorry. Just how it is (ladies).


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-06 05:40:00 UTC

  • (He is not supporting segregation, but kin selection.)

    http://vidmax.com/video/122436-1971-Legendary-boxer-Mohammed-Ali-goes-on-a-racist-rant-supporting-racial-segregationINTERESTING

    (He is not supporting segregation, but kin selection.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-03 01:12:00 UTC

  • are so many supermodels from the Midwest? Nordic genes

    http://www.businessinsider.com/why-so-many-supermodels-are-from-the-midwest-2015-8Why are so many supermodels from the Midwest?

    Nordic genes.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-02 08:53:00 UTC

  • NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST. SORRY. Culture-ist yes. Class-ist yes. Intelligence-ist

    NOT A WHITE NATIONALIST. SORRY.

    Culture-ist yes. Class-ist yes. Intelligence-ist, yes. Gender-ist, yes. Right of exclusion-ist, yes. Tribe-ist, nope. Racist Nope. Sorry. Not my thing. The meaningful differences between the races and tribes are differences in distributions not differences in properties. Aristocracy is for everyone. The more tribes the better. The more colorful the better. I read Darwin. I’m reasonably current on genetics. I’m all for restoring eugenic reproduction via one child policy for the dependent classes. And I’m all for charity for the dependent underclasses. But I’m into bettering every human family, not blaming other humans for acting like humans. So my preference is to criticize westerners for their suicidal group evolutionary strategy, not others for exercising theirs. But then again I am a rather scientific philosopher, and not a populist.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-30 12:57:00 UTC

  • FIGHTING: Is this true? Watch videos on how white men fight. It’s interesting. W

    FIGHTING: Is this true?

    Watch videos on how white men fight. It’s interesting.

    We evolved to fight in formation, using weapons. We are not impulsive. We have pacified much of our impulsive classes out of the gene pool. But we need weapons to fight with. We need to fight in groups. This is the secret to the evolution of western martial capability: technology plus cooperation.

    Watch how fighting has changed due to the introduction of MMA. We pulled kicking from Asia, joints from Asia (low power techniques), wrestling from the west, and boxing from the west(high power techniques).

    Watch how fighting has changed due to the popularization of fight videos.

    Watch the emerging evidence that power makes over skill and endurance.

    Fighting is evolving into little more than striking jaws with roundhouses. Meaning that white people need to carry weapons once again.

    Africans have the most testosterone, are still impulsive, but they get such speed out of it, and they have amazing reach. It’s beautiful to watch them move. Africans are to fighting what white people are to ballet.

    Africans don’t stop when you are down. And they seem to take much greater punishment before going down. More testosterone. They are less afraid of later retaliation?

    Whites and asians do stop when you are down, and take less punishment. The purpose of our peoples is to stop the other. They are more afraid of later retaliation? (HBD Chick: is clannishness involved?)

    Asians are definitely less sexually mature, that is the secret to their longevity. Africans more sexually mature. Human longevity will come from continuing humanity’s long process of extending sexual maturity. It wouldn’t hurt if we could find an appetite suppressant either.

    This is not true of southeast asians, who are just a smaller, lighter, earlier version of man.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-28 04:52:00 UTC

  • Explaining American Directness and Volume to Foreigners

    —“The speaking volume in the United States for most conversations is very loud, which in many other countries would be considered rude. … Also, business people in the United States use very direct language and tight time management when communicating and running meetings, which people from many other countries might find off-putting.” –Raj Patel

    ON VOLUME It’s counter-intuitive, but our volume is an expression of high trust: that if I can be said, it can be said in public, and with confidence or it should not be said. Or conversely, quiet people who speak in whispers may have other nasty habits. ORIGINS It is beneficial to remember that Anglo and Germanic civilizations only split in 1830, and that america was founded by pre-1830 anglos, and that the majority of white americans are at least of partial german decent. America is an english speaking germanic country. That is what separates English speaking America from english speaking Britain, Canada and Australia. (This insight is rather profound and you will find that it explains many american cultural peculiarities. America is a Tudor,German, Civilization with english institutions, law and language). We can also recall that the world now operates Military, Aircraft, and Seas in English (germanic english) using English commands and manners, because we found out that the rest of the world operates on face (lying), hierarchical(untrue), indirect(untrue), and permissive (untrue), language suitable for village life but not for running DANGEROUS environments where truth, clarity, and directness save lives. But the question is, why did germanic anglos invent this kind of direct language? BECAUSE WESTERNERS WERE ALL MEMBERS OF THE MILITIA. German evolved as an aristocratic, martial, language. And westerners have been practicing decentralized (militia) warfare for over 5000 years – at least since they invented the Chariot. So even today, the first thing you are taught in basic training is to speak clearly, loudly, confidently, and TESTIMONIALLY (truthfully), regardless of the social impact of your speech – because otherwise PEOPLE DIE. Americans and Germans retain (Germans more so) this military culture in daily life: speak directly, clearly and truthfully. Quiet speech means you are not to be trusted, and not a fully mature adult. Until the last few generations, we were taught GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC (public speaking) as a requirement. COMPARISON FOR HINDUS You are correct in stating that this directness eliminates cooperative economic friction, decreases the necessity of developing trust (it’s assumed) and increases the use of litigation when it fails. That is because america does not regulate what we do, it punishes what we do if we fail. (This is profound difference between the napoleonic ‘parental and permission” model of law. It is not obvious but while we have very similar genetic origins, and while we both have inherited the common law, that the reason India is so pervasively corrupt, is that it is not a high trust society that has succeeded in creating a universal militia independent of class, tribe and family biases. (and the decline in truth telling in favor of political correctness and postmodern argument in all walks of life is the reason for increasing corruption in america.) The west has been through a 5000 year meat grinder military service and the relative success of the west in all fields – science, commerce, and law – is because we tell the testimonial truth regardless of cost to anyone. Because as a martial people, doing so is your path to status and enfranchisement. And because in a martial people, the truth means people live in battle. And martial people were led by martial aristocracy. It has only been since the enfranchisement of women that these requirements for disciplined truth telling have been systematically undermined. And just as martial truth-telling (testimony) is the secret of the west’s evolutionary velocity compared to older civilizations, the secret of our downfall is the decline of this tradition of martial truth telling due to the inclusion of women in the electorate. (Look at the voting data. Look at today’s voting data. American white men vote red everywhere other than main and Seattle.) And that’s pretty scary really.

  • Explaining American Directness and Volume to Foreigners

    —“The speaking volume in the United States for most conversations is very loud, which in many other countries would be considered rude. … Also, business people in the United States use very direct language and tight time management when communicating and running meetings, which people from many other countries might find off-putting.” –Raj Patel

    ON VOLUME It’s counter-intuitive, but our volume is an expression of high trust: that if I can be said, it can be said in public, and with confidence or it should not be said. Or conversely, quiet people who speak in whispers may have other nasty habits. ORIGINS It is beneficial to remember that Anglo and Germanic civilizations only split in 1830, and that america was founded by pre-1830 anglos, and that the majority of white americans are at least of partial german decent. America is an english speaking germanic country. That is what separates English speaking America from english speaking Britain, Canada and Australia. (This insight is rather profound and you will find that it explains many american cultural peculiarities. America is a Tudor,German, Civilization with english institutions, law and language). We can also recall that the world now operates Military, Aircraft, and Seas in English (germanic english) using English commands and manners, because we found out that the rest of the world operates on face (lying), hierarchical(untrue), indirect(untrue), and permissive (untrue), language suitable for village life but not for running DANGEROUS environments where truth, clarity, and directness save lives. But the question is, why did germanic anglos invent this kind of direct language? BECAUSE WESTERNERS WERE ALL MEMBERS OF THE MILITIA. German evolved as an aristocratic, martial, language. And westerners have been practicing decentralized (militia) warfare for over 5000 years – at least since they invented the Chariot. So even today, the first thing you are taught in basic training is to speak clearly, loudly, confidently, and TESTIMONIALLY (truthfully), regardless of the social impact of your speech – because otherwise PEOPLE DIE. Americans and Germans retain (Germans more so) this military culture in daily life: speak directly, clearly and truthfully. Quiet speech means you are not to be trusted, and not a fully mature adult. Until the last few generations, we were taught GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC (public speaking) as a requirement. COMPARISON FOR HINDUS You are correct in stating that this directness eliminates cooperative economic friction, decreases the necessity of developing trust (it’s assumed) and increases the use of litigation when it fails. That is because america does not regulate what we do, it punishes what we do if we fail. (This is profound difference between the napoleonic ‘parental and permission” model of law. It is not obvious but while we have very similar genetic origins, and while we both have inherited the common law, that the reason India is so pervasively corrupt, is that it is not a high trust society that has succeeded in creating a universal militia independent of class, tribe and family biases. (and the decline in truth telling in favor of political correctness and postmodern argument in all walks of life is the reason for increasing corruption in america.) The west has been through a 5000 year meat grinder military service and the relative success of the west in all fields – science, commerce, and law – is because we tell the testimonial truth regardless of cost to anyone. Because as a martial people, doing so is your path to status and enfranchisement. And because in a martial people, the truth means people live in battle. And martial people were led by martial aristocracy. It has only been since the enfranchisement of women that these requirements for disciplined truth telling have been systematically undermined. And just as martial truth-telling (testimony) is the secret of the west’s evolutionary velocity compared to older civilizations, the secret of our downfall is the decline of this tradition of martial truth telling due to the inclusion of women in the electorate. (Look at the voting data. Look at today’s voting data. American white men vote red everywhere other than main and Seattle.) And that’s pretty scary really.

  • Untitled

    http://intersectionproject.eu/article/society/russians-searching-new-motherland


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-26 04:26:00 UTC

  • EUROPEANS INBRED ESP. DURING THE MEDIEVAL MIGRATION PERIOD. Findings: 1) Admixtu

    http://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdfExtended/S0960-9822(15)00949-5WESTERN EUROPEANS INBRED ESP. DURING THE MEDIEVAL MIGRATION PERIOD.

    Findings:

    1) Admixture within Europe tended to fall within the European Migration Period

    2) West Eurasian genetic structure today is likely to have been maintained by admixture

    –“recent admixture is ubiquitous across West Eurasia, with the majority of populations showing evidence of population mixing. Dating of these admixture events demonstrates that the Medieval Migration Period was a key period in establishing the current West Eurasian genetic landscape”–


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-25 13:38:00 UTC