Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Near Breeding, Selective Mating, Late Marriage, Suppression of Underclass Reprod

    Near Breeding, Selective Mating, Late Marriage, Suppression of Underclass Reproduction produces constantly improving norms, institutions, and commons.

    I am pretty sure that the evidence is in, that once you pollute a family with less desirable genes, that you can’t cleanse it – ever – unless you isolate and near-breed for centuries.

    In my own family I see Scandinavian (Ellen and I), german celt (me), mixed with Irish Celt, Dark Irish (my uncle John), Western Celt (Jean), Pole, Czech and Slav (John and Pat’s children), Slav and Dark Irish in their children. Most Doolittles carry R1b and look largely Celtic, although german rather than Scott’s Irish. The Oulette’s and Theriaults are poor french farmers from french and english celts. Although my mother’s father is undeniably a proper ‘Gaul’ – they’re big, and they have that Gallic nose. My daughters are different: one very much Celt, the other very much Czech with Celt. My son and my nephew are near clones with that white-blonde hair and round heads you see in Scandinavia and Finland. You can tell a lot from nose, teeth, eyes and skull shape. So we’re pretty typical northern europeans.

    Why do I mention this? Well, some groups have been successful at adopting genes wherever they go (Indo-Iran, Hittite, Greek, Semite, European), and some groups benefit from isolation (japanese, europeans). And some groups suffer from competition against the hordes (the middle east, central asia, africa). And some seem to form castes to overcome competition (india, south america).

    But the only way for genes to ‘correct’ (meaning exit bad genes) is with a small enough population to select for traits, but large enough to avoid near-breeding.

    If you’re White (Ethnically European), Certain west african tribes, Japanese, Korean, Han, there is nowhere to go but down by outbreeding, or incorporating new genes. If you’re not, then there is always a benefit to capturing better genes.

    And no that’s not an opinion, that’s demonstrated human behavior.

    More Symmetrical

    Younger – looking (less maturity)

    Taller (for men, not for women)

    Clearer, Fairer Skin

    Less Impulsive (although impulsivity is reproductively valuable in less desirables)

    More Intelligent (which is complicated)

    Age Better (less accumulated cellular damage)

    So it works like this: the worse genes you possess the more value is breeding up. The better are your genes the more value is in not breeding down. For everyone else – the vast middle – the best strategy is breeding up without breeding out.

    If we preserved the family we would preserve these traits. But we didn’t. So we don’t. Families protect, tribes protect, nations protect, but corporate states don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-22 03:59:00 UTC

  • (star wars. in russian. director did his job capturing the feeling of the franch

    (star wars. in russian. director did his job capturing the feeling of the franchise. felt forced and contrived. felt anti-white. looked pretty. not morally moving or inspiring. positivistic soap opera. But I didn’t want to walk out.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 14:37:00 UTC

  • I am sorry. I’m confused. How is “gods chosen people” any different from “master

    I am sorry. I’m confused. How is “gods chosen people” any different from “master race”? ‘Cause I don’t think there is any. So I must be confused.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 14:13:00 UTC

  • Western success disproportionately resulted from reproductive, manorial and crim

    Western success disproportionately resulted from reproductive, manorial and criminal eugenics. #NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-19 03:00:00 UTC

  • not an amren fan and and I prefer to avoid racism, but this data is continuing t

    http://www.moreright.net/murder-would-fall-by-91-percent-in-an-all-white-new-york-city/I’m not an amren fan and and I prefer to avoid racism, but this data is continuing the overwhelming evidence that European eugenics is the source of our lower criminality, and that reversing it has the logical effect


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-18 21:57:00 UTC

  • Quarter, Ghetto, Now Ghetto City?

    [W]e had ‘Ghettos’ and ‘Quarters’ under the Great Christian Monarchies. There is no reason we cannot have ghettos and quarters as we did under smaller scale states, and no reason we cannot have whole cities under today’s governments of greater scale. Rule, governance, commerce, and existence are very different things. (I have seen escape from ny btw. lol)

  • Quarter, Ghetto, Now Ghetto City?

    [W]e had ‘Ghettos’ and ‘Quarters’ under the Great Christian Monarchies. There is no reason we cannot have ghettos and quarters as we did under smaller scale states, and no reason we cannot have whole cities under today’s governments of greater scale. Rule, governance, commerce, and existence are very different things. (I have seen escape from ny btw. lol)

  • The Cults of Megalomania: Justification of Non-Integration

    [B]oth Jewish and Muslim cults include the original claims of Megalomania and utopianism that Abraham invested in the doctrine, and which is the excuse used to both create unity and prevent assimilation into host civilizations. The master race of the Nazis was the same argument made by genetic destiny rather than divine command. There is no difference. The middle east evolved separatism because it is an intersection of the races, and leadership wanted to prevent assimilation into assyrian, egyptian, and greek civilizations. And none could hold the territory against them. So they all failed to create a territorial ethic. It’s to be expected. They were traders and herders who raided and rain, not farmers who conducted war and held their ground. But there is no difference at all between Nazi Racism and Aesthetic-Culturism and Jewish Racism and Religiocity and Muslim Religiocity. None. They are group evolutionary strategies for landed germanic and unlanded semitic peoples. That is all. Nothing more. Nothing less. We carry out history in our genes as well as our cultures. Non-integration is the premise of jewish and muslim societies. (That ought to ruffle a few feathers.)

  • The Cults of Megalomania: Justification of Non-Integration

    [B]oth Jewish and Muslim cults include the original claims of Megalomania and utopianism that Abraham invested in the doctrine, and which is the excuse used to both create unity and prevent assimilation into host civilizations. The master race of the Nazis was the same argument made by genetic destiny rather than divine command. There is no difference. The middle east evolved separatism because it is an intersection of the races, and leadership wanted to prevent assimilation into assyrian, egyptian, and greek civilizations. And none could hold the territory against them. So they all failed to create a territorial ethic. It’s to be expected. They were traders and herders who raided and rain, not farmers who conducted war and held their ground. But there is no difference at all between Nazi Racism and Aesthetic-Culturism and Jewish Racism and Religiocity and Muslim Religiocity. None. They are group evolutionary strategies for landed germanic and unlanded semitic peoples. That is all. Nothing more. Nothing less. We carry out history in our genes as well as our cultures. Non-integration is the premise of jewish and muslim societies. (That ought to ruffle a few feathers.)

  • No Race Is Prohibited from Transcendence

    [L]ARGELY BECAUSE OF RATES OF REPRODUCTION, RACIAL DIFFERENCES ARE HORMONAL (NO RACE IS PROHIBITED FROM TRANSCENDENCE ASSUMING CONTROL OF REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES) Lets Stick With Occam’s Razor As far as I can tell, the central problems affecting the Chinese people are (a) lack of verbal intelligence (b) a written and spoken language that does not assist in improving verbal intelligence, (c) hierarchy to compensate for lack of verbal intelligence (d) the perpetuation of Sun Tzu’s central argument for ‘deceive and delay’ in which dishonesty, face, and conflict avoidance are considered good social mores. But if we look at the inability for Chinese to speak the truth, it is in no small part because IT IS EXPENSIVE and VERBALLY DIFFICULT to tell the truth. Now, I generally prefer institutional and normative causes to genetic, just as europeans developed truth telling, individualism, the jury, and polycentrism because of their verbal acumen, it appears that the Chinese developed lying, hierarchy, authority, centralism to compensate for their inability to articulate ideas. We have Chinese Engineers on one side of the spectrum, Jewish lawyers and propagandists on the other, and europeans in the middle – and europeans differ in that they weaponized ‘truth’ rather than either delay and deceive, or cunning verbal deception. Asians can’t drive and have verbal limitations. Africans can drive, but have a problem with verbal and abstract limitations. East asians appear to have larger average cranial capacity and hence better memories and modeling capability. It appears that ashkenazim have more white matter (I am trying to make sure this is correct, but it appears so) as a result of higher exposure to malaria. So my working hypothesis is that we Sapiens vary almost exclusively in growth pattern and hormonal distribution, and that much of this hormonal distribution is in sexual maturity (most african, least east asian), and sexual bias (solipsistic female-verbal, autistic male-spatial). Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. And hormonal variation can create the entire spectrum of homo sapiens behavior. I suspect that science will eventually eliminate all other possibilities and that this will be the final analysis. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine