Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • OK NEW CUT ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY (draft) So Zoroastrianism was constructed to

    OK NEW CUT ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    (draft)

    So Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples.

    Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest.

    THE REVOLUTION

    The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale.

    The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means.

    THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT

    Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion.

    Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals.

    Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible.

    Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. )

    THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION

    The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution.

    The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor.

    The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods.

    The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.)

    THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH

    Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science).

    The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism.

    The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism.

    The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us.

    Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation.

    Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press.

    BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood.

    Branch 1 – Jewish

    Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success)

    Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power)

    Branch 2 – Neo Puritan

    Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality.

    Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia.

    THE FAILED REACTION

    Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere.

    RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it.

    The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities.

    EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible.

    Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders.

    Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation.

    SYNTHESIS

    Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics.

    In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s.

    THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL.

    Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism.

    But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justiy conquest.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 05:48:00 UTC

  • ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retal

    ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation.*** Jewish law, culture, and religion attempt to preserve separatism so that they gain the benefits of the host’s commons production, without paying for the normative commons. Just as Gypsies do, but gypsies keep the cost low enough, and appeal to our altruism enough, that the cost of extermination is more than we are willing to pay. Jews do not limit their parasitism, and perform it largely through externality or deception, and this is why they are, over the centuries, repeatedly retaliated against: because the cost has become high enough that hosts must.****

    This is not unknown since jewish authors discuss this problem openly.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 01:30:00 UTC

  • VIOLENCE AS CULTURAL EXPRESSION Subtle cultural difference in cultural policing.

    VIOLENCE AS CULTURAL EXPRESSION

    Subtle cultural difference in cultural policing.

    – Muslims (arabs) tend to strike and run (anonymous)

    – Black Americans tend to sucker punch you then stomp you. (anonymous)

    – Russians tend to hit you fast and early and hard. (individual)

    – Americans tend to hit you after giving you every opportunity. (individual)

    – Ukrainians tend to remove you then hit you if its useful and necessary (group).

    – Chinese tend to accumulate vast forces and then do what they want (collective) knowing that you have no choice.

    I don’t know why I never noticed this before but it’s a wonderful way to examine cultural norms.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 06:00:00 UTC

  • I LOVE CHILDREN. I LOVE MY PEOPLE’S CHILDREN. Ukraine is full of my people and t

    I LOVE CHILDREN. I LOVE MY PEOPLE’S CHILDREN.

    Ukraine is full of my people and their children.

    I need more kids. Mine or someone else’s. I don’t much care.

    I’m happy to participate in kin redistribution.

    It’s non-kin redistribution that makes me angry.

    OFFSPRING CONSTITUTE A CATEGORY OF PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION. CONVERSION OF CONSUMPTION TO ENTERTAINMENT RATHER THAN OFFSPRING IS BAD. CONVERSION TO COMPETITORS IS WORSE.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 02:31:00 UTC

  • Santagata: Love and Understanding

    [L]ove;

    I love my family… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my nation… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my DNA, my genes, my race… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. Love cannot create hate. But hate and haters can and always do blame love and lovers for problems of the world.

  • Santagata: Love and Understanding

    [L]ove;

    I love my family… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my nation… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my DNA, my genes, my race… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. Love cannot create hate. But hate and haters can and always do blame love and lovers for problems of the world.

  • Eli Harman on Our (Women’s) Lack Of Ethno-Centrism

    —“And another feature of Western peoples is low ethnocentrism, because normative outbreeding and the prohibition on inbreeding mixed up the tribes and clans, creating homogenous outbred populations that can universalize kinship trust. This also was a competitive advanatage. White people form the largest ingroups. But we have a tendency to simply assume everyone is ingroup, and treat them accordingly, because in the past, that generally would have been the case. So those features have been hacked, by hostile aliens, who have convinced many of us we can gain status, and signal enlightenment and sophistication, by incessantly attacking our own, for the benefit of outgroup parasites who are unwilling or unable to reciprocate the kinship trust, or kinship altruism, that we extend them.”—-Eli Harman

  • Eli Harman on Our (Women’s) Lack Of Ethno-Centrism

    —“And another feature of Western peoples is low ethnocentrism, because normative outbreeding and the prohibition on inbreeding mixed up the tribes and clans, creating homogenous outbred populations that can universalize kinship trust. This also was a competitive advanatage. White people form the largest ingroups. But we have a tendency to simply assume everyone is ingroup, and treat them accordingly, because in the past, that generally would have been the case. So those features have been hacked, by hostile aliens, who have convinced many of us we can gain status, and signal enlightenment and sophistication, by incessantly attacking our own, for the benefit of outgroup parasites who are unwilling or unable to reciprocate the kinship trust, or kinship altruism, that we extend them.”—-Eli Harman

  • HITS HARD ON OUR LACK OF ETHNOCENTRISM —“And another feature of Western people

    http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2016/01/another-eli-harman-guest-post.htmlELI HITS HARD ON OUR LACK OF ETHNOCENTRISM

    —“And another feature of Western peoples is low ethnocentrism, because normative outbreeding and the prohibition on inbreeding mixed up the tribes and clans, creating homogenous outbred populations that can universalize kinship trust. This also was a competitive advanatage. White people form the largest ingroups. But we have a tendency to simply assume everyone is ingroup, and treat them accordingly, because in the past, that generally would have been the case. So those features have been hacked, by hostile aliens, who have convinced many of us we can gain status, and signal enlightenment and sophistication, by incessantly attacking our own, for the benefit of outgroup parasites who are unwilling or unable to reciprocate the kinship trust, or kinship altruism, that we extend them.”—-Eli Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-10 04:45:00 UTC

  • TEN RANDOM ISSUES WITH MULTICULTURALISM (I posted this as a comment on ex-army)

    TEN RANDOM ISSUES WITH MULTICULTURALISM

    (I posted this as a comment on ex-army)

    1) it provides cheap unearned status signals for a lot of people who would otherwise be daily confronted by their low status. (disinformation but I suppose ok)

    2) It provides the female reproductive strategy with intuitionistic allies against alphas. (women may like it because it increases the herd but it’s a bad thing)

    3) It provides numbers to the peasants who would steal and the priests (state) that encourages them. (very bad under democracy)

    4) It drives up housing prices and demand for credit and consumption (this is the only material benefit) that would otherwise not exist. (economists think its good, taxmen think its good, otherwise it’s disastrously inflationary and distorts out entire information system)

    5) It misdirects effort and capital into consumption rather than to increases in productivity (which in the long term is a bad thing)

    6) It consumes accumulated normative capital. (very bad)

    7) If from the lower classes it decreases genetic (human) capital, and in some cases (France) reverses the all benefits of teaching science and literacy.

    8) It creates competition for privilege in government. (very bad)

    9) it increase conflict and therefore demand for government. (very bad)

    10) A lot of people like being directed by government and having someone else to do the policing, rather than doing it themselves. (to each his own but not at others cost)

    I could continue this list, easily to 100 items. But you get the point.

    We spent thousands of years culling our herd through various means of genetic pacification And in order to pay people to retire early and support single mothers we have burned millennia of eugenic investment that made our high trust civilization possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-10 03:08:00 UTC