—“Christianity became a mask for Aryanism”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-09 13:18:00 UTC
—“Christianity became a mask for Aryanism”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-09 13:18:00 UTC
—The conquerors of the New World are now having to admit the reality of history: tribal peoples reduced to a few survivors, civilizations extinguished, technologies – such as the stone masonry of the Incas – lost for all time, in the name of a universal religion.
Christianity became a mask for Aryanism; now the mask is being removed, and the painful choice faced, between Universalism and Particularism. When major TV documentaries, such as 500 Nations, portray the European coming to North America from the point of view of the native tribes and civilizations, it raises the problem of reconciling this conquest with the universalism which came through Christianity.
The native peoples are now recovering their dignity, their religion and their beauty, while “White Christians” are losing theirs. Now that the West has a multiracial, multicultural society, “White Christians” are not sure what to call themselves, how to think of themselves: as “Whites” (particularist) or as “Christians” (universalist).—
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-09 13:17:00 UTC
sprawling 2.5 aches, he’s joking right?
make it 250 & I’ll still need to think about it, some of us still remember what happened to the Volga Germans.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-08 10:09:00 UTC
Why is Racism against whites tolerated in Asia?
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-racism-against-Asians-go-ignored-unpunished-and-unacknowledged-in-the-United-States
Why is Racism against whites tolerated in Asia?
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-racism-against-Asians-go-ignored-unpunished-and-unacknowledged-in-the-United-States
It would look like the demographic origins of the population – just like now.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-01 19:22:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726854359817031682
Reply addressees: @WBH_Politics @JustinWolfers @jsprayberry
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726405249892671488
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726405249892671488
http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/04/27/book-review-albions-seed/–the Puritan migration to America was basically a eugenicist’s wet dream—
Much like eg Unitarians today, the Puritans were a religious group that drew disproportionately from the most educated and education-obsessed parts of the English populace. Literacy among immigrants to Massachusetts was twice as high as the English average, and in an age when the vast majority of Europeans were farmers most immigrants to Massachusetts were skilled craftsmen or scholars. And the Puritan “homeland” of East Anglia was a an unusually intellectual place, with strong influences from Dutch and Continental trade; historian Havelock Ellis finds that it “accounts for a much larger proportion of literary, scientific, and intellectual achievement than any other part of England.”
Furthermore, only the best Puritans were allowed to go to Massachusetts; Fischer writes that “it may have been the only English colony that required some of its immigrants to submit letters of recommendation” and that “those who did not fit in were banished to other colonies and sent back to England”. Puritan “headhunters” went back to England to recruit “godly men” and “honest men” who “must not be of the poorer sort”.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-01 15:31:00 UTC
RT @AliceTeller: Maybe if you went back to Mexico and told them everything we do right here, instead of telling us what we do wrong, both w…
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-01 09:49:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726710211017318401
Also. This graph looks differently when adjusted for population, race and religion.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-01 09:46:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726709412136648704
Reply addressees: @conradhackett
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726663007254642688
IN REPLY TO:
@conradhackett
Say religion very important
Pakistan 98%
Nigeria 90
Brazil 74
Turkey 70
US 54
Russia 18
France 13
Japan 10
China 2 https://t.co/hufjWmy3hg
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/726663007254642688
[L]eft the video on, and ended up listening to Brits debate policy all night, and it is very clear that there is a difference between the moral structure of British argument and the LEGAL structure of american argument. In my dreams I kept arguing with people about the use of nonsense words. There is also a very great difference between the British fascination with procedure and moral righteousness defending it, and american fascination with law, and punishment for transgressions. Again, this illustrates the great difference between British abstract moral, American articulate legal, and German duty/empirical Cultures. A procedural person always seeks a process even though people do not follow those processes they follow rational incentives. An american seeks to understand incentives so that we produce the right rewards and punishments. Germans TRAIN YOU UNEQUIVOCALLY to know your duty and practice it, and to be intolerant of those who don’t. I won’t get into what jewish philosophy says, but it is translatable to “Whatever you can get someone else to agree to – damn the consequences or externalities.”