In looks are white women at a disadvantage to Latino women? https://www.quora.com/In-looks-are-white-women-at-a-disadvantage-to-Latino-women/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=a56ae653
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 06:23:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763621828543873024
The reason #Quora s__ks? The hired bots that repeatedly post BS and illogical questions in poor English. Hindufication hasn’t helped either.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 02:33:00 UTC
The data says that white men will prefer chasing latino women over white women because they perceive them as ‘easier’ and less ‘arrogant’.
https://www.quora.com/In-looks-are-white-women-at-a-disadvantage-to-Latino-women
(crude)
You know guys, we have our own version of the Asian girl. They’re eastern european, primarily polish, petite and commonly under 5’4″. Think Megan Fox(more germanic) and Mila Kunis (more slavic). They seem to be distributed from Poland(very dark brown hair) to Georgia(black hair). And they’re pretty much perfect in every way.
(comments not necessary)
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-06 09:00:00 UTC
I love Slavic men. They start an argument. Ten of their friends arrive and try to talk them out of fighting. They argue until they start swinging. And the friends make sure the fight is settled, but no one gets killed.
You do not disrespect people in post soviet countries. It was impermissible under the Soviets and it stuck.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-06 07:03:00 UTC
Universal morality limits clannishness but if beyond the clan induces vulnerability to genetic invasion and conquest.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 06:33:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761087524269719552
Reply addressees: @HbdNrx @dacian_draco
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761057988991791105
IN REPLY TO:
@HbdNrx
@dacian_draco @curtdoolittle that Westerners developed universalist morality that helped western societies prior to modern travel but
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761057988991791105
It’s not pathological altruism. It’s hight trust and Aryanism. The same thing that gave us fertile ground for Christianity and white man’s burden, and progressivism, and the same thing that gave the Russians their urge for conquest and empire.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-29 21:22:00 UTC
During the Age of Transformation (Karen Armstrong, Marijia Gimbutas) the military strategy the group used to resist or conquer out-groups determined, and set in mental stone: in myth, tradition, law, literature, norm and value, the consequential metaphysics (assumptions and values) of each civilization. And they survive to this day. In no small part because we have exercised the eugenic or dysgenic values in each of those eras, and to no small degree bred for adaptation to those strategies.
Iranian, Egyptian, Chinese Armies in the river plains
European warrior aristocracy and its militias.
Steppe tribal raiders.
Diasporic traders and wandering herdsmen, gypsies, and pirates.
What we are apparently afraid to face, is that the long term de-civilizing consequences that have led to India and the muslim world, and africa, and now to south america can also be brought here to the upper lattitudes because of our use of fossil fuel heating and air conditioning. Demographic distributions matter more than excellences. No genius can reorganize a society of these imbalances without a return to either working class command economies, or it’s predecessor slavery. It’s simple math. They are too relatively unproductive to generate a concentration of wealth necessary for a voluntary organization of production (capitalism) to create marginal (decidable and influential) differences in reward necessary to form the various networks of hierarchies that as a collective can survive competition.
Man was not oppressed by aristocracy. Man and Woman were domesticated, like every other feral animal, through a continuous process of eugenics that suppressed the lower class reproduction and redistributed reproduction upward, while at the same time increasing the scope of parasitic prohibitions that we call laws, and incrementally forcing everyone into productive activities in order to survive. We sent to war, hung, or starved the rest.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-28 09:49:00 UTC
—“How about stopping with the anti-Semitic nonsense. Rothbard’s libertarianism has nothing to do with “Jewish Ethics”. . . try reading the Old Testament. Rothbard was for libertarian elites and opposed to statist ones.”— Peter E McAlpine
Conversely, it has everything to do with jewish ethics, because likewise, it has everything to do with the attempt by the anglos, french, germans, and ashkenazi’s to express their group evolutionary strategies as universals.
That’s the context of all my arguments: ALL ENLIGHTEMNTS FAILED because all enlightenments stated their nature as ‘the nature of man’ and it’s anything but the nature of man.
The theory behind propertarianism and testimonialism is that we all screwed up.
1) man is rational and chooses rational actions. (cog sci)
2) groups develop competitive strategies that suit their geographic and demographic conditions. (Huntington)
3) these strategies evolved at the time of the Great Transformation out of whatever military (physically competing) strategies we used at the time, and were converted from physical tactics to political, ethical, moral, and religious justificationary narratives and arguments. (Gimbutas, Armstrong)
4) they evolved further when our family structures began to reflect our agrarian inheritance structures (Todd)
5) Evidence from American diaspora is that these properties were incorporated into our genes during the past x thousand years.(Fischer)
4) however universal decidability in matters of conflict is possible across whatever those boundaries are (Natural Law)
5) and that universal decidability is provided by nonimposition of costs against property-in-toto (across group strategies) not against just several (private) property within-groups, or across near-groups.
6) and therefore we can create a market for the production of commons that crosses preferences (in, near, out-group), not under the monopoly of consent (assent), but under the minority of legal prohibition on the use of commons as a means of parasitism (dissent).
7) and that it was this attempt to preserve in-group authority under majoritarian democracy that each group attempted to seize during the enlightenment, using whatever strategy was available to them:
Anglo empirical – using very close to strictly constructed law – by misstating the nature of man as moral rather than rational
German rational by attempting to preserve authority of the church and nobility through rational statement of the great narrative.
French moral, by attempting to preserve the authority of the church on entirely moralistic (catholic) grounds.
Russian romantic by attempting to preserve nihilism as the need for authority given the immorality of man, using nothing but narrative.
Jewish pseudoscientific by using authoritarianism and pseudoscience, and suggestion that appeals to moral bias.
WHY DO I MAKE THIS ARGUMENT?
To show that all these errors, wishful thinking, and deceptions failed. And that the enlightenment was incomplete. But that it need not be overturned. Instead, that we might COMPLETE the enlightenment by completing the failed movement of the last century: the requirement for existentially rather than allegory in matters published into the informational commons – and by further requirement of strict construction in the publishing of laws proper, legislation(common contract), and regulation (unregulated commands).
WHY SUCH STRICTNESS
Because of the need to continue our historical evolution by incrementally suppressing new means of parasitism as they are created by man.
ERGO:
Do not criticize my work for what you ascertain, when I construct it based upon what I ascertain.
NO MORE LIES.
The next evolution of man is as costly as the last.
We can complete the enlightenment.
We can convert from the use of internally consistent rationalism to fully correspondent testimonialism, and eradicate the methods of deception in ethics, morality, politics, law, economics, and social science, and even the arts.
Just as we converted from mysticism.
And the rewards appear at least, to be equally as great if we do.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosohpy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-25 09:15:00 UTC
Religious invasion, and immigrant invasion has done more damage to Europa than all our wars combined. So let that sink in a bit. #tcot #tlot
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-23 16:34:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/756890192091484160