Theme: Ethnoculture

  • No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is th

    No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is through the male jewish intermarriage with the european female line, and continued selection upon it, within a cognitively feminine subculture.

    WOmen are actually more aggressive than men, and this is part of why the ashkenazi succeed. Higher intelligence, (not by much but enough), verbal-pictoral specialization (female), greater ability to carry calculative workload (female), and higher aggression.

    Kind of fascinating really.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:30:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635183918317568

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania Verbal acuity in acad

    RT @curtdoolittle: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania Verbal acuity in academic research is an advantage. asians have the opposite adv…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:34:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714605902911656225

  • Verbal acuity in academic research is an advantage. asians have the opposite adv

    Verbal acuity in academic research is an advantage. asians have the opposite advantage. europeans are in the middle. European inventiveness is the oddity.

    Underrated is that askenazim have inherited the female capacity to carry workload (verbal is cheaper than spatial cognition.) So the advantage is a wider SD, more outliers, verbal acuity, and superior ability to carry a workload, provide three advantages not one. Add higher aggression and high invstment parenting and thats five advantages. (at the cost of adopting female neuroticism, mental illness, and attenion seeking)

    We should expect and do observe race diffrences in cognition expressd at the margins. Though its not jews per se but Askenazim. The advantage does not extend to non european jews.

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:34:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714605858934460416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714191815794909346

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: Read my new column, “America, Jr.” on Justin Trudeau’s strateg

    RT @Steve_Sailer: Read my new column, “America, Jr.” on Justin Trudeau’s strategy of massive legal immigration:
    https://www.takimag.com/article/america-jr/


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:19:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714602005392511399

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: REPATRIATION OF AMERICAN LAND We’re at war; drive them out. Ex

    RT @ThruTheHayes: REPATRIATION OF AMERICAN LAND

    We’re at war; drive them out.

    Extend this practice to other countries and states within s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 02:42:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714472022808330701

  • “Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”– Research has been done. Always com

    –“Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”–
    Research has been done. Always comes out the same.
    To begin with, a lot of prizes were contentious. Look up nobel prize controversies. These prizes are not ‘certifications’ we think they are. You will learn more from the list of controversies than you will from the list of prizes and prize winners.

    As for jewish Nobel Prize winners.
    1) Many are of obvious merit. Einstein even deserved more than he recieved but his work was later proven by others. Borh is have jewish and I have serious criticisms of some of the nonsense he has stated and the harm it’s done but his math is at least correct.
    2) Most prizes in general are immatieral (seriously, in general.)
    3) There is a ‘promoter’ effect in who gets the award and of course they are always and everywhere performing nepotism regardless of merit (once you see it its actually annoying). The technique is called ‘heaping undue praise’ and again it’s a female behavior applied to male domain which is why we aren’t good at suppressing it yet.

    Even with these criticisms, it appears that at least in physics and possibly chemistry, many of the awards are deserved. And jewish culture has been using high investment parenting in education for non-manual careers for over two thousand years, so selection has done it’s job.

    I’m not so interestedin jewish IQ claims, what I’m interested in is the distribution which appeas to have a wider SD, producing more outliers above 140 with the female ability to utilize verbal acuity and carry a verbal workload.

    Unfortunately ashkenazim also dominate the production of pseudosciences in every singe field to the degree that it’s almost bizarre that it’s continued this long – precisely becaue of the pictoral-verbal bias of the cognitiely feminine.

    How to Think About The Ashkenazim
    So it’s better to think of the Ashkenazim like say, the Dutch, or Austrians (or Hungarians), as a small country that focuses heavily on education and produces a dispropotionate number of scholars, sciencde, tech, and industry per capita

    Compare Israel to The Netherlands (apples to apples):

    Netherlands
    Compare with 18M people in the netherlands with 16,000 square miles of north sea coastal territory. producing a GDP of US$991 billion (about $1T) and it’s Per capita GDP US$72,973.

    Israel
    Israel only has 7.1M jews in 10,241 square miles (the other 25% are arabs and mixed races)
    producing GDP of US$564 billion and
    GDP per capita at US$58,270(astounding).
    Making israel a wealthy country.
    Jews In The USA
    The number of jews in the states is about 11M of various degrees of observance. No way to separate out their per capita GDP.
    Israeli + American Jews (over 80% of jews)
    If American jews moved to israel, that would mean a total jewish population of 18M people, in 10,241 square miles of mediterranean coastal (trade port) territory. Even assuming the GDP per capita remained the same (it would go up becaues of the benefits of scale) it would be, on the order of $1T (about the same as the netherlands).

    The difference is that the netherlands is competing with the other most advanced countries in the world, and israel is competing with neighbors whose GDP is an average of US$ 6,610 – absolute poverty.

    Israel is already a “regional superpower” militarily, economically, politically, scientifically, technically. And the arab world needs what israel is bringing to it if it is ever to escape it’s ignorance and poverty.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @innnspace @madmikeross @FarajRashi93307 @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:42:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714018998126325760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714006311237734838

  • “Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively aga

    –“Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively against the west vs the rest?”–

    They’re exploiting a weakness in western civilization that is a byproduct of our mandate of individual sovereignty and responsibility. Meaning our civilization does not defend against baiting into hazard like all other civilizations do. In the end ‘its your choice, and you bear the responsibility”. The difference is our people don’t practice baiting into hazard because of ancient traditions and assumptions I won’t go into here for the sake of brevity.

    No other civilization tolerates this – at least in terms of money and interest – and islam in particular is brutal about it precisely because it’s been a problem for them in the past.

    So they have successfully exploited this vulnerability. All we would have to do is extend the definition of fraud to cover baitings into hazard, on one end, and rent seeking on the other. And while it’s technical it’s not difficult.

    You don’t need to understand the tehcnicalities of the law or the criteria for those judgements you only need to undrsteand that we’ve done that work, it’s rock solid, and you would NOT BELIEVE how many of our problems today are the result of NOT suppressing baiting into hazard, and women’s claims of oppression as a means of evading responsibilty for the commons.

    Reply addressees: @DanielB02277937 @billionsmustliv


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:49:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714005775343898624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003748500963627

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @billionsmustliv –“Q: whats the difference between jews and

    RT @curtdoolittle: @billionsmustliv –“Q: whats the difference between jews and euros at math”–

    Excellences: Ashkenazi (not just jewish)…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:40:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003340185452879

  • We have a wondrful want to be left alone – they have a disturbing want to not le

    We have a wondrful want to be left alone – they have a disturbing want to not leave others alone. As most sophisticated conservative rabbis will tell you, if jews ‘did not intrefere with their hosts’ they would be fine.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:57:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713947183618142689

    Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713944929729118715

  • “Q: whats the difference between jews and euros at math”– Excellences: Ashkenaz

    –“Q: whats the difference between jews and euros at math”–

    Excellences: Ashkenazi (not just jewish) verbal acuity, eastern systemic acuity, and european western equilibrium between them. The reasons for western inventiveness are something that’s been studied and I think we have a handle on it as genetics AND traditions.

    CAUSALITY

    Female empathic-verbal-pictoral(static),
    vs
    Male physical-systemic-modeling (over time)

    In other words women and jews see math as language and european men see math as measurement of things.

    It’s why we are still finding some very smart women, they are not innovative or as are men. Their insights are generally empirical(experiential) not theoretical (systems over time)

    Yes that’s a simplification to first principles but you will find there are no exceptions.

    Reply addressees: @billionsmustliv


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:48:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713944970246168577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713942266916823148