I have learned this mostly from my friends in south america. And we now have the genetic data, testing data, and economic data to confirm it. But the problem facing south america is that there are just toooooo many people at the bottom for the people at the top to provide sufficient incentives to the middle class, who in turn will provide sufficient incenties to the lower class, so that it’s possible to productively organize society. It’s not as bad as islamic countrires, where people are highly illiterate and where Islam teaches people that they can be emotionally expressive and emotionally impulsive. At least south american s are still christian. But it’s just almost impossible to create a window within which the people can be organized, and a sufficient middle class developed, to raise the population out of poverty.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
Time To Teach Elites They Are Nothing Without Their People
(by Eli Harman ) Elites are naturally less racist, less ethnocentric, more cosmopolitan, than the lower classes. Elites can interact with *other* elites as peers. They don’t have to squabble over pieces of pie because they can make pie.
But the lower classes are justifiably racist, nationalistic, xenophobic, because they are in direct competition over resources they don’t create, infrastructure, services, social spending, jobs, and so on and so forth. Additionally, the higher impulsivity of the lower classes increases the frictions that arise from differences and proximity. And they can’t afford to isolate themselves from these. The classes can cooperate on common interests. And elites can cooperate with foreign elites. But in order for these two imperatives not to conflict, and for classes not to conflict, elites must stop claiming, defending, exercising, and sacralizing a “right” to betray and sacrifice their lower classes to others. A people are less without their elites. But elites are nothing without their people. Time to teach them. H/t Curt Doolittle -
Time To Teach Elites They Are Nothing Without Their People
(by Eli Harman ) Elites are naturally less racist, less ethnocentric, more cosmopolitan, than the lower classes. Elites can interact with *other* elites as peers. They don’t have to squabble over pieces of pie because they can make pie.
But the lower classes are justifiably racist, nationalistic, xenophobic, because they are in direct competition over resources they don’t create, infrastructure, services, social spending, jobs, and so on and so forth. Additionally, the higher impulsivity of the lower classes increases the frictions that arise from differences and proximity. And they can’t afford to isolate themselves from these. The classes can cooperate on common interests. And elites can cooperate with foreign elites. But in order for these two imperatives not to conflict, and for classes not to conflict, elites must stop claiming, defending, exercising, and sacralizing a “right” to betray and sacrifice their lower classes to others. A people are less without their elites. But elites are nothing without their people. Time to teach them. H/t Curt Doolittle -
The Best Way To Cull The Bottom Appears To Be To Leave Them Behind And Move Away
—“East Asians (Chinese, Japanese and Koreans) obtain the highest mean IQ at 105. Europeans follow with an IQ of 100. Some ways below these are the Inuit or Eskimos (IQ 91), South East Asians (IQ 87), Native American Indians (IQ 87), Pacific Islanders (IQ 85), and South Asians and North Africans (IQ 84). Well below these are the sub-Saharan Africans (IQ 67), the Australian Aborigines (IQ 62), the Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert, and the Pygmies of the Congo rain forests (IQ 54).”—
-
The Best Way To Cull The Bottom Appears To Be To Leave Them Behind And Move Away
—“East Asians (Chinese, Japanese and Koreans) obtain the highest mean IQ at 105. Europeans follow with an IQ of 100. Some ways below these are the Inuit or Eskimos (IQ 91), South East Asians (IQ 87), Native American Indians (IQ 87), Pacific Islanders (IQ 85), and South Asians and North Africans (IQ 84). Well below these are the sub-Saharan Africans (IQ 67), the Australian Aborigines (IQ 62), the Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert, and the Pygmies of the Congo rain forests (IQ 54).”—
-
VOCABULARY Aryans: ………… Indo-Europeans in Toto Yamnaya: …….. Europea
VOCABULARY
Aryans: ………… Indo-Europeans in Toto
Yamnaya: …….. Europeans In Particular
Kurgans: ………. Burial Mounds
Corded Ware: .. Archeological Record
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-07 07:44:00 UTC
-
You’re White And You’re The Bad Guy? Rule or Be Ruled. It’s Not Complicated.
(by Eli Harman) If you’re a f__king white male, you are the bad guy, the cause of all the world’s problems, the personification of historic evil. That’s the role that has been prepared for you and assigned to you. You don’t get to decline the role. The standard of evil has been updated to including denying you are evil. The harder you deny it, the more evil you are. The dialectical traps have been woven and laid to ensure there is no escape.
The only choice you get to make is how you play the role. The expectation is typically that you will play it badly; that you will apologize for who your ancestors were and what they did, and live your life bowing and scraping and trying vainly to make amends for crimes which can never be forgiven or expunged; that you will take everyone’s side against yourself and give everything away in exchange for nothing. But why do that? That’s stupid. There is nothing in it for us. You could also play it well. Though somewhat degenerated from our heyday, we’re still the baddest motherfuckers who have ever lived, and if we put our heads together and use a little team work we can fuck up everyone else’s shit, take what we want, do what we want, lord over inferior people and not put up with any of their bullshit. They don’t have to like it. They don’t have to like us. They don’t have to understand what we do or why. The only thing they need to understand is that if they fuck with us, they’re going to have a bad time. You couldn’t possibly get any less respect by going off script than you would by playing the role as written. -
You’re White And You’re The Bad Guy? Rule or Be Ruled. It’s Not Complicated.
(by Eli Harman) If you’re a f__king white male, you are the bad guy, the cause of all the world’s problems, the personification of historic evil. That’s the role that has been prepared for you and assigned to you. You don’t get to decline the role. The standard of evil has been updated to including denying you are evil. The harder you deny it, the more evil you are. The dialectical traps have been woven and laid to ensure there is no escape.
The only choice you get to make is how you play the role. The expectation is typically that you will play it badly; that you will apologize for who your ancestors were and what they did, and live your life bowing and scraping and trying vainly to make amends for crimes which can never be forgiven or expunged; that you will take everyone’s side against yourself and give everything away in exchange for nothing. But why do that? That’s stupid. There is nothing in it for us. You could also play it well. Though somewhat degenerated from our heyday, we’re still the baddest motherfuckers who have ever lived, and if we put our heads together and use a little team work we can fuck up everyone else’s shit, take what we want, do what we want, lord over inferior people and not put up with any of their bullshit. They don’t have to like it. They don’t have to like us. They don’t have to understand what we do or why. The only thing they need to understand is that if they fuck with us, they’re going to have a bad time. You couldn’t possibly get any less respect by going off script than you would by playing the role as written. -
SORRY, BUT PLATO, ARISTOTLE, SMITH(ECONOMICS), LOCKE(LAW), PHILOSOPHY(HUME), JEF
SORRY, BUT PLATO, ARISTOTLE, SMITH(ECONOMICS), LOCKE(LAW), PHILOSOPHY(HUME), JEFFERSON, HAYEK…
These men are Aryans (Heroic, Commons-Contributing, Paternalistic, Domesticating, Aristocratic Egalitarians, Practicing Aristocratic Rule). To the degree that they are Christian, we can say only that there is nothing in the Christian world that was not present in the Aryan world.
The Christian world is but a kinder one in which the underclasses are serfs with moral rights we must respect as good parents, rather than slaves with legal rights we must obey as good rulers as in the ancient world.
Source date (UTC): 2016-10-02 04:27:00 UTC
-
The Age of Transformation
During the Age of Transformation (Karen Armstrong, Marijia Gimbutas) the military strategy the group used to resist or conquer out-groups determined, and set in mental stone: in myth, tradition, law, literature, norm and value, the consequential metaphysics (assumptions and values) of each civilization. And they survive to this day. In no small part because we have exercised the eugenic or dysgenic values in each of those eras, and to no small degree bred for adaptation to those strategies. Iranian, Egyptian, Chinese Armies in the river plains European warrior aristocracy and its militias. Steppe tribal raiders. Diasporic traders and wandering herdsmen, gypsies, and pirates. What we are apparently afraid to face, is that the long term de-civilizing consequences that have led to India and the muslim world, and africa, and now to south america can also be brought here to the upper lattitudes because of our use of fossil fuel heating and air conditioning. Demographic distributions matter more than excellences. No genius can reorganize a society of these imbalances without a return to either working class command economies, or it’s predecessor slavery. It’s simple math. They are too relatively unproductive to generate a concentration of wealth necessary for a voluntary organization of production (capitalism) to create marginal (decidable and influential) differences in reward necessary to form the various networks of hierarchies that as a collective can survive competition. Man was not oppressed by aristocracy. Man and Woman were domesticated, like every other feral animal, through a continuous process of eugenics that suppressed the lower class reproduction and redistributed reproduction upward, while at the same time increasing the scope of parasitic prohibitions that we call laws, and incrementally forcing everyone into productive activities in order to survive. We sent to war, hung, or starved the rest.