Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “read more sources” Apparently you don’t know who you’re talking to. 🙂 There ar

    “read more sources”
    Apparently you don’t know who you’re talking to. 🙂

    There are 3M muslims in the USA. Or under 1%.
    There are 19M muslims in the EU, or 3.8%.
    There are 1.57B muslims in the world, about 23% of the world population.
    Only 20%, or 314M of that 1.57B live in the middle east-north africa (MENA).
    The origin of civil(city)ization is anatolia. The origin of city states sufficient to produce surplusess to pay for specialits and trade is mesopotamia.
    These people were not muslims.
    The problem is islam.
    When the church converted christiantiy to law this was impossible for the arabs who created a heresy of christianity called Islam in odrer to repeat the slave revolt that was christianity into an underclass revolt against the tribal chieftains who were, by all measures, some of the worst humans who ever lived.

    Reply addressees: @L_erbgha @jacksonhinklle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 14:20:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716822070443790336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716818713197068449

  • I’ve written about latin america before. But it’s more variable than the middle

    I’ve written about latin america before. But it’s more variable than the middle

    I’ve written about latin america before. But it’s more variable than the middle east.

    Mexico is an interesting example but the entire latin american region from mexico to argentina varies ‘as much as europeans do from asians’.

    I”m busy at the moment so I can’t produce the same… https://t.co/UNU9WxnV2J


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-23 12:33:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716432570957676837

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716306615337443610

  • FUTURE: TURKEY, IRAN, AND EGYPT VS THE ARABS I Don’t disagree on potential of th

    FUTURE: TURKEY, IRAN, AND EGYPT VS THE ARABS
    I Don’t disagree on potential of these countries.
    I. Turkey is ethnically greek (indo european), despite the Kurds who dominate half of the country are Iranic.
    II. Iran is a mess but it’s still got enough ethnically persian (indo european).
    And III. Egypt isn’t all that arabized and are at least half ancient egyptian (south eurasian)
    All three of these countries suffer from (a) arabization and (b) islamization. (c) diversity. It’s tragic. And look what happend just to Lebanon recently. A catholic wealthy successful country turned into a disaster by muslim immigration.

    I. TURKEY
    Turkey is more than half Indo European, with little Arab genetic contribution.

    Indigenous Anatolian Component:
    a) Anatolian Influence: Before the Turkic migrations, the Anatolian peninsula was home to various indigenous groups, such as Hittites, Urartians, and others. Estimates suggest that this component could make up around 20-30% of the genetic landscape.

    b) Greek, Bulgarian, and Other Balkan Influence: Due to the Ottoman Empire’s rule over the Balkans and subsequent population exchanges, there is a notable Balkan genetic component, possibly around 10-20%.

    c) Caucasian Component:
    Armenian, Georgian, and Circassian Influence: Particularly in Eastern and Northeastern Turkey, the Caucasian influence is notable. This could be estimated around 5-15%.
    (In other words, Turkey is 50-65% Indo European – which they really, really, don’t like by the way.;) )

    Turkic Component:
    Oghuz Turks and Central Asian Influence: This is the most significant component due to the Turkic migrations and the establishment of the Ottoman Empire. This could range from 30-40%.

    Kurdish Component:
    Southern and Southeastern Regions: In regions bordering Syria and Iraq, there is some Arab and Kurdish influence, possibly making up around 10-20%.
    (Unfortunately I don’t see good numbers, but my estimation based on more recent data is that the Kurdish percentage is around 20%, the Arab is quite small. And the Turkic component is heavily overstated.

    Other Minorities:
    Jewish, Laz, and Others: These smaller groups contribute to the remaining genetic composition and are hard to quantify but might range around 1-5%.

    II. IRAN
    Iran is still 50-60% iranic.

    Indigenous Component:
    a) Persian Influence: The majority ethnic group in Iran is Persian, and they are estimated to make up around 50-60% of the population. Genetically, they are a mix of ancient Iranian peoples and subsequent migrations.
    b) Aryan Migration: The initial Aryan migration into the Iranian plateau has left a significant genetic component. While it’s challenging to quantify precisely, it could be considered as part of the “Indigenous Component.”

    Arab Component:
    Islamic Conquests and Later Migrations: The Arab component is less pronounced in Iran compared to some other countries in the region, estimated to be around 10-15%.

    Turkic Component:
    Turkmen, Azeris, and other Turkic groups: Turkic peoples, particularly Azeris, are a significant minority in Iran, and their genetic influence might range from 15-25%.

    Other Minorities:
    Kurds, Baloch, and Others: These groups contribute to the remaining genetic composition, which could range around 10-20%.

    Caucasian and Russian Influence:
    Northern Regions: In the northern regions adjacent to the Caucasus and Central Asia, there’s some genetic influence from these areas, estimated to be less than 5%.

    South Asian Influence:
    Eastern Regions: In regions bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan, there is some South Asian genetic influence, also estimated to be less than 5%.

    III. EGYPT
    Egyptian Genetics: not very arabized.
    (note that I included the south eurasian component to avoid conflation)

    South Eurasian Component:
    Ancient Egyptian Influence: This could be estimated to comprise around 40-50% of the genetic makeup, being a significant portion that represents continuity from ancient populations.

    North African Component:
    Berber and Indigenous Influence: Estimates vary, but this could be around 10-20% of the genetic makeup, particularly in Western Egypt.

    Nubian or Sub-Saharan African Influence:
    In Upper Egypt, this component may be more prevalent, potentially around 15-25%.

    European Component:
    Greek and Roman Influence: Given the historical periods of Greek and Roman rule, this component could be around 5-10%.

    Arab Component:
    Islamic Conquests, Trade and Later Migrations: Depending on the region, the Arab component could vary significantly but generally might make up around 15-25% of the genetic makeup.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716178117201473536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716167218470281726

  • Middle eastern history is quite simple. It’s a mall that intersects the “four co

    Middle eastern history is quite simple.
    It’s a mall that intersects the “four contients” (europe,asia, india, and africa) and four races, and it has the fertile crescent for africa and the middle east, and india has her major rivers and china has hers. SO there was the possibility of food sufficient for producing specialists. And specialized producing goods and services for trade.

    But middle eastern history conists of one tribe conquering a region, then building an economy, the anothe tribe conquering them and this process repeated throughout all of history until the Europeans, the Indians and the Chinese basically cut them off with the age of sail,ending the utility of the silk road, as well as the geography of the ‘mall’, and then walled them in with the agrairan-to-industrial revolutions.

    So MENA never developed nationalism, the nation state, high trust peoples, rule of law and trade. Becaue they cannot cooperate at scale, because theiving cheating corruption and ‘getting it first before someone else does’ is their ethical foundation. So they developed the opposite – the only strategy possible – the stragey of women: undermining.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:34:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716161214928105472

  • Multiculturalism leads to restoration of tribalism, leads to restoration of low

    Multiculturalism leads to restoration of tribalism, leads to restoration of low trust, leads to demand for political authority, leads to friction in cooperation, leads to decline of civil society (ours is almost gone now) leads to politicl factions (ours are most divisive), leads…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716154833093132704

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716039445806547054

  • No. The holodomor (no silent ‘e’ at the end in russian or ukrainian), was agains

    No. The holodomor (no silent ‘e’ at the end in russian or ukrainian), was against all Ukrainians. However, The Pale of Settlement allowing permanent residency of jews in the Russian empire included all of modern-day Belarus and Moldova, much of Lithuania, Ukraine and east-central Poland, and relatively small parts of Latvia and what is now the western Russian Federation.
    So, ukraine was also a dominant locaiton of european jews for a long time specifically because it was a borderland where empires could not enforce homogeneity. So, jews abused the locals there more so than usual, and the Ukrainians did eventually take it out on them – causing either departure or integration. you will find that unless you are very sensitive the the feminine bias in jewish cognition that a LOT of people in urkaine, at least in certain areas, have some fragment of jewish ancestry.
    I have a friend in western ukraine who denies it, but it’s so obvious it’s ridiculous. And he won’t get a genetic test because he doesn’t want to know the answer.
    Ukraine is not afraid of racism or any other ism because they don’t have the luxury to lie to themselves (like the west does for virtue signaling).

    Reply addressees: @MikeGol29268248 @MelishMarcus @SamParkerSenate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:07:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716154337959780352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716123294858928445

  • RT @JackOfAwlTrades: @Areez22 @TheBest0pinions @curtdoolittle It’s quite easy to

    RT @JackOfAwlTrades: @Areez22 @TheBest0pinions @curtdoolittle It’s quite easy to ‘act’ less tribal when all creature comforts are at arms l…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:01:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716152899623956658

  • This is false. A simple review of the world value survey and any search through

    This is false. A simple review of the world value survey and any search through any of the research archives will produce confirmation of my position.
    You are conflating familial and tribal (kinship interest) with metaphysical, normative, ethical, moral, cultural, political, national, and racial (cooperative interest at scale).
    All peoples are nationalist and racist, with indians and chinese most racist of all. Oddly, europeans are the least racist, least tribal, least familial and most ‘commons-ist’. Yet because we are also the most advanced civ, and people want to cohabitate with us without conforming and integrating we are accused the most – when it’s the failure to integrate (because others most often can’t do so) that’s the problem.
    If you studed our work you’d immedicately recognize such conflation as the feminine instinct for justification for non-adaptation – which explains, so far, almost all of your assertions and lies. You probably can’t control it. It’s probably both genetic and cultural. But it’s just feminine lying one way or the other.

    Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @Areez22 @JackOfAwlTrades


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:01:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716152831843954688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716094821176410518

  • This is correct. And the problem is they’re a dead weight on the rest of the jew

    This is correct. And the problem is they’re a dead weight on the rest of the jews. (Just as the rest are a burden on their host civilizations). So this is one of the reasons Netanyahu is aggressively moving forward with the (unpleasant, undemocratic) reforms necessary to preserve the state. Sometimes statesmen aren’t wrong. He’s not wrong. He’s a rational man trying to save cognitively feminine population from their own obsessions – the same obsessions that have plagued their people for millennia: feminine irresponsibilty for the commons.

    Reply addressees: @SolutreanDACA @jskayfshd


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 14:59:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716107123338182656

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715989335307125237

  • Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism b

    Multicultural just means tribal. Westserners succeeded in overcoming tribalism because it’s a liability that impedes trust and institutional formation enabling the benefits of cooperation at scale. Westerners overcame familism before tribalism. Becaues again, it’s a liability that prevents production of high trust commons. That’s why every tribal society is primitive. Multiculutralism is a bad thing. There is no extant evidence to the contrary – other than it’s enjoyable to have ‘quarters’ in international-trade cities so there is some transfer of ideas but not a transfer of culture or people.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 22:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715488356472119296