Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Is The White Race Violent Naturally Or Were They Taught To Be?

    I’m going to give you the best, most scientific answer that is currently available. You may or may not like it. But to the best of my knowledge it’s unassailable.

    1. The white race is empirically less violent than all other races. (sorry. fact.) We currently attribute this to the facts that (a) limited survival of the underclasses in harsh winters, (b) the aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year (heavy intolerance for crime), (c) high sexual dimorphism combined with lower levels of testosterone and therefore lower levels of impulsivity and aggression, (d) higher demonstrated creativity which appears to be a genetically influenced personality trait (curiosity, ‘worry’, and industriousness). (e) greater freedom (for men) to compete in the dominance hierarchy.
    2. The white race is empirically superior at the application technology, voluntary cooperation, planning, and maneuver to the use of violence, thereby allowing smaller numbers of warriors to defeat superior and wealthier numbers.
    3. The white race has empirically used the application of violence to create markets that in turn increase wealth.
    4. The white race’s superiority in ancient and modern ages is because of the use of violence and technology to create markets.
    5. The white race’s superiority at producing arts, sciences, and technologies is because of their discovery of ‘deflationary truth’. (What we call scientific or empirical truth, that evolved from ‘reporting’ or ‘testifying’ rather than opining, elaborating, or conflating – regardless of cost to the self or others.)
    6. The white race’s discovery of ‘deflationary truth’ was caused by the use of the militia, that indoctrinated all free men into the use of military and technological epistemology. This mean that all mean of property were trained to some degree, and all the wealthier families were professionally trained, to use maneuver,
    7. The white race’s use of militia forced meritocracy, and meritocracy forced ‘sovereignty’, and sovereignty forced the natural law of voluntary reciprocity, and use of the natural law forced markets in everything: the jury, freedom of association, of cooperation, of cooperative production, of reproduction (Marriage), of production of commons (government), of polities (competing rule).
    8. The white race (North Sea Peoples) evolved the only government without governors: Rule of Law, by Natural Law, incrementally discovered by independent professional judges, and recorded in the Common Law of Torts, with judicial decidability provided by the changes in state of Property in Toto, where Property in Toto was determined by the bearing of costs to obtain an interest without imposing a cost upon the costs born by others. This form of law evolves faster than all alternatives, and leaves the least opportunity for the evolution of all forms of parasitism and predation. (Or it did until 20th democracy eliminated Rule of Law.)
    9. So to answer the question, while whites are demonstrably less violent, they are demonstrably more cooperative, with demonstrably higher trust in one another, producing lower risk and friction, allowing greater risk, allowing greater returns, and thereby evolving technologies both institutional, normative, commercial, and technological, faster than all other civilizations. This is why the west, despite being on the edge of the bronze age, evolved fastest in the ancient world, and fastest in the modern world, with the dark ages of religiously enforced ignorance causing a thousand year delay in world innovation.

      However, it is probably more correct to view white people as more patient and disciplined and industrious – probably due to four or more millennia of selection pressures above the 40th parallel – and therefore suppressing petty violence in exchange for expression of superior exceptional violence. But again, this may be for the simple reason that except for Han, Korean, and the Japanese, White People are the most genetically homogenous, genetically isolated, genetically domesticated, for the simple reason that they have systematically eradicated their lower classes.
    10. The white race was able to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, starvation, and disease, one civilization at a time, by the application of sovereignty (property), markets, technology, truth, using violence to do so. Evolution is unkind to primitive organisms. primitive social organizations, and primitive ideas.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-white-race-violent-naturally-or-were-they-taught-to-be

  • “How does western value fit in a non globalized world? Or do you think your answ

    —“How does western value fit in a non globalized world? Or do you think your answer lies in a new rendition of re-western globalization?”—Justin Fortune

    The west ceases attempting to colonize other civilizations in the name of commerce (and democracy), prohibits its own colonization, and we continue the re-emergence of the balance of civilizations and balance of powers that has been the norm in all history aside from a few similar periods of rapid technological change.

    I mean, that’s whats happening now. The west’s technological advantage is dissipating rapidly, and therefore its economic advantage, leaving only its institutional and demographic advantage.

    Given that technological advantages are easily transferrable, institutional more difficult, and demographic and cultural advantages nearly impossible to replicate, then this is the only method of maintaining the western relative standard of living.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-18 06:41:00 UTC

  • I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious vi

    I suppose it’s hard to accept, that after a century of selling the fictitious virtues of the genetic underclasses in order to profit from their consumption, indoctrination, and votes, that the single best action we can take to improve the lot of individual, family, community, nation, and mankind, is to reduce their number.

    World Systems Theory is an odd, Marxist, term for expressing evolution by the replacement of physical warfare with economic warfare, with informational warfare, with reproductive warfare. But evolution remains evolution; devolution devolution; and extinction extinction whether early or late in the process of speciation.

    But then, like the first generations of Abrahamism, Marxism and Critical Theory are just another form of information warfare in which the false promise of universal equality replaces the false promise of socialist prosperity, which replaced the false promise of heavenly life after death.

    Evolve. Kill them all.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-17 09:01:00 UTC

  • (((Ancestry))) continues the ‘diversity’ agenda by suggesting that you share gen

    (((Ancestry))) continues the ‘diversity’ agenda by suggesting that you share genes with other regions rather than that other regions share common ancestors, and that the survival of similar genes from common ancestors is both selected and random.

    Use 23andMe instead.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-16 17:57:00 UTC

  • “Equality of outcome isn’t a privilege westerners grant to one another, so I hav

    —“Equality of outcome isn’t a privilege westerners grant to one another, so I have no idea why we would extend such a generous privilege to others, who, statistically speaking, demonstrate inferiority within the relevant domains. Unless it is to buy their votes under democracy.”– Ely Harman

    Violations of reciprocity on all levels….

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-14 12:19:00 UTC

  • “People with culture colonize; people without culture multiculture-ize.”—Antho

    —“People with culture colonize; people without culture multiculture-ize.”—Anthony Ray Collins

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:07:00 UTC

  • Any Group Can Cull Its Lower Classes

    –“What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race and IQ. The average IQ of a certain race represents more of an population make up. What portion of a certain race of people possess agency, thus seeking liberty or sovereignty. Aka how much of them can make into the “aristocratic” class. The West(whites), through their strategy(law and culture) effectively culled the lower tier(less beneficial to a cooperative society)gene pool, enough so that they were able to make enough progress to dominate the entire globe. The other races simply didn’t have the chance to do so, hence the difference in average IQ.”— Liu Gx Liu Gx : Well, that’s the idea, yes. In addition: 1) Any group can cull its lower classes through various means – and transcend their median/average IQ. And nationalism will encourage (force) that to occur, while globalism and ‘tolerance’ creates permanent parasitic classes that can eventually overwhelm the aristocratic classes (the curse of agrarianism). 2) Immigration is a MULTIPLIER ON DAMAGES if we look at average iQ and the consequences of decline in average IQ. 3) Ashkenazi verbal ability, aggression and clannishness, Han spatial ability and conscientiousness, white balance spatial/verbal and creativity and lack of clannishness, african athleticism, extroversion and verbal weakness will always differentiate the groups because these seem to be material differences evident at the extremes.

  • Any Group Can Cull Its Lower Classes

    –“What I’ve interpreted by reading Curt Doolittle’s posts so far regarding Race and IQ. The average IQ of a certain race represents more of an population make up. What portion of a certain race of people possess agency, thus seeking liberty or sovereignty. Aka how much of them can make into the “aristocratic” class. The West(whites), through their strategy(law and culture) effectively culled the lower tier(less beneficial to a cooperative society)gene pool, enough so that they were able to make enough progress to dominate the entire globe. The other races simply didn’t have the chance to do so, hence the difference in average IQ.”— Liu Gx Liu Gx : Well, that’s the idea, yes. In addition: 1) Any group can cull its lower classes through various means – and transcend their median/average IQ. And nationalism will encourage (force) that to occur, while globalism and ‘tolerance’ creates permanent parasitic classes that can eventually overwhelm the aristocratic classes (the curse of agrarianism). 2) Immigration is a MULTIPLIER ON DAMAGES if we look at average iQ and the consequences of decline in average IQ. 3) Ashkenazi verbal ability, aggression and clannishness, Han spatial ability and conscientiousness, white balance spatial/verbal and creativity and lack of clannishness, african athleticism, extroversion and verbal weakness will always differentiate the groups because these seem to be material differences evident at the extremes.

  • The Burden of Immigrants

    One parasitic burden immigrants often impose is overconsumption. Prosperity requires productivity. Productivity requires accumulated capital. Capital requires savings and investment. When a people become prosperous on account of their propensity to save and invest, that attracts immigrants from less prosperous areas, with less prosperous qualities. Even if they only consume what they produce, (that is, even absent redistribution and entitlements) they did not accumulate the capital which now enables them to produce. And if they do not save and invest at rates comparable to the natives, but consume all of their produce (or more) then they are not adding to the capital structure of their new home, but depreciating it, and eroding the conditions which temporarily allow them to enjoy higher incomes and standards of living than they formerly did. Without those immigrants, the native people could retain exclusive use of that capital structure, and its full productive output, in the form of higher wages for their labor, while continuing to add to it.

  • The Burden of Immigrants

    One parasitic burden immigrants often impose is overconsumption. Prosperity requires productivity. Productivity requires accumulated capital. Capital requires savings and investment. When a people become prosperous on account of their propensity to save and invest, that attracts immigrants from less prosperous areas, with less prosperous qualities. Even if they only consume what they produce, (that is, even absent redistribution and entitlements) they did not accumulate the capital which now enables them to produce. And if they do not save and invest at rates comparable to the natives, but consume all of their produce (or more) then they are not adding to the capital structure of their new home, but depreciating it, and eroding the conditions which temporarily allow them to enjoy higher incomes and standards of living than they formerly did. Without those immigrants, the native people could retain exclusive use of that capital structure, and its full productive output, in the form of higher wages for their labor, while continuing to add to it.