Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • WTH IS WRONG WITH THE SOUTHERN SLAVS? (please don’t get pissed. I want to know t

    WTH IS WRONG WITH THE SOUTHERN SLAVS?

    (please don’t get pissed. I want to know the cause. )

    I mean, look. Slovenians (clearly slavic) 96. Ukrainians pick on slovenians for being a bit ‘slow’. But favorably. (They talk about Moldovans the way americans talk about Mexicans. )

    BUT….WTH:…

    Albania 90

    Bosnia/Herz. 90

    Croatia 90

    Serbia 89

    I mean. These are nearly indigenous-people IQ’s.

    (they speak slavonic languages, but they aren’t ethnic slavs?)

    I have only spent a little time in Croatia, in Dubrovnik, and I’d live there in a heartbeat if I could get 100mb internet. But wth? Is this native genomes, or is this muslim occupation? What?

    ( Alexander Zavialov ??? )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:44:00 UTC

  • I proposed, in one of my videos, the circumpolar civilization. And that video is

    I proposed, in one of my videos, the circumpolar civilization. And that video is worth viewing if you want to understand my point of view.

    But the reality is quite simple. The west, the western slavs, the russians, the indians, the Han (chinese), Koreans, and The Japanese, have no problems with each other. We have no problem with africa. The world has a problem with islam. The world is starting to have a problem with south america – although we have hope.

    But if the west would stop defending islam, and continue to ‘civilize’ india, the world would have no problems other than competing for trade.

    The entire cause of this world’s suffering is islamic ‘civilization’ if you want to call it that.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 16:28:00 UTC

  • That’s the reason you know. The thing that makes germans the best civilization a

    That’s the reason you know. The thing that makes germans the best civilization also makes them the most gullible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 17:48:00 UTC

  • THE ALT RIGHT (OR NEW RIGHT) BY CAUSE RATHER THAN LANGUAGE The alt right (or new

    THE ALT RIGHT (OR NEW RIGHT) BY CAUSE RATHER THAN LANGUAGE

    The alt right (or new right) has given up hope of reconciliation and returned to separatism.

    The Hopeful Right of the 18th, 19th, and 20th, centuries have been proven wrong by the evidence. And we have transitions to the Unhopeful Right. And finally, the Resigned Right.

    Why? Because it is not possible to create the enlightenment fantasy of Aristocracy of Everyone.

    Man was not oppressed by the aristocracy. Man was domesticated from beast, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen, and if possible he might, if he possessed sufficient agency, earn his sovereignty among other sovereign men.

    But since man was not oppressed, and man was merely domesticated – like every other plant and animal – many men (and many more women) are not domesticated sufficiently, so that they lack the agency, to join the aristocracy, of sovereign men.

    The problem the anglo middle class man created, was his siezure of the power of the state from the aristocracy under the pretense of oppression rather than the evidence of domestication.

    Through colonialism and then marxist-postmodernism, this error has spread round the world.

    And faced with the evidence, the aristocracy of everyone – the ‘egalitarianism’ – has failed, and the right is abandoning it, and deflating christianity, and returning to the ethics of aristocracy.

    So the redaction of christian universalist ethics of the enlightenment has occurred across all classes, and we are seeing the reactions of different classes from the Nat-Soc labor class, to the alt-right working class, to the nationalist middle class, to the civilizational upper middle class, to the academic class (people like Me, Duchesne, MacDonald, and even to a lesser degree Peterson) all demonstrating our class-communication methods but all of us saying precisely the same thing.

    That the christian universalist era is over, and the myth of the aristocracy of everyone is over. And the myth of the oppressed is over.

    It’s just aristocracy of those of us with agency, and the rest of the barbarian animals that have yet to be domesticated.

    We must only choose whether to fence off the animals, or pay the high cost of domesticating them against their will

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 13:50:00 UTC

  • IMMIGRATION IN A FEDERATION 0) Asylum is ended forever. Peoples must pay the cos

    IMMIGRATION IN A FEDERATION

    0) Asylum is ended forever. Peoples must pay the cost of their own political transformation even if it means their death. This is the only way to force transformation of primitive governments and make kin pay for the survival and transcendence of kin.

    1) Any immigrant must be sponsored by an individual who pays for insurance that guarantees the ‘return’ of any immigrant if he requires costs, or commits any crime whatsoever.

    2) Any region (state) that grants this permission access limits that individual to that region (state). (period). An individual may obtain insurance for access to each other region(state). But no guarantee is substitutable.

    3) All persons under insurance (non citizens) and their offspring remain the responsibility of their insurer of birth. Forcible repatriation is mandatory, and no person may immigrate from countries that prohibit forcible repatriation. ENding anchor babies forever.

    4) Any insurer-of-birth may demand repatriation of any individual at any time, regardless of domestic commitments, and the balance of any insurance returned to the individual, and the insurer shall dispose of any domestic property and return the liquidated value to the individual.

    5) All individuals who do so immigrate shall ‘fully integrate’ in language, dress, manner, and custom or they shall be repatriated within three years. (criminalize non-integration)

    6) An individual may transfer insurer-of-birth (citizenship) and end payment for insurance, after no less than 15 years, if he can demonstrate full integration and sufficient assets to carry himself to end-of-life without burden (cost) on the rest of the population.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 13:30:00 UTC

  • IT”S NOT SO MUCH WHITE AND DARK, AS SUCCESS AND FAILURE AT NEOTONY. The european

    IT”S NOT SO MUCH WHITE AND DARK, AS SUCCESS AND FAILURE AT NEOTONY.

    The european west and the han/japanese/koreans look very different but we have far more in common than we do with the steppe/desert/tundra peoples who are less developed than east and west.

    I mean, fundamentally, caucasians branch just into two groups: the more evolved Neotonic northern with flatter faces and smaller noses and lighter hair, and the less evolved less Neotonic southern with pointier faces and bigger noses and darker hair.

    I mean, the real problem if you want to get down to it, is that the east and west succeeded in neoteny and the center did not, for the simple reason that there were too many tribes in conflict, and the area was more suitable to the preservation of pastoralism, so the desert, steppe, and tundra people didn’t have as much time to go through the farming and commercial phases, shrink their underclasses, and succeed in neotonic evolutoin.

    I mean. They’re more aggressive. It’s simple.

    Aggression and large numbers that live poor quality lives is a competitive advantage against less aggressive with smaller numbers that live better lives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 23:27:00 UTC

  • Human Evolutionary Genetics: Why Do Some White People Have Flat Butts? Or, Why Does It Seem Some People Of African Ancestry Have Larger Butts? What Is The Physical Difference In The Bodies That Determines The Body Shape?

    Research Neoteny. Some peoples have succeeded at self domestication more than others.

    https://www.quora.com/Human-Evolutionary-Genetics-Why-do-some-white-people-have-flat-butts-Or-why-does-it-seem-some-people-of-African-ancestry-have-larger-butts-What-is-the-physical-difference-in-the-bodies-that-determines-the-body-shape

  • Human Evolutionary Genetics: Why Do Some White People Have Flat Butts? Or, Why Does It Seem Some People Of African Ancestry Have Larger Butts? What Is The Physical Difference In The Bodies That Determines The Body Shape?

    Research Neoteny. Some peoples have succeeded at self domestication more than others.

    https://www.quora.com/Human-Evolutionary-Genetics-Why-do-some-white-people-have-flat-butts-Or-why-does-it-seem-some-people-of-African-ancestry-have-larger-butts-What-is-the-physical-difference-in-the-bodies-that-determines-the-body-shape

  • MADE MY DAY. ANOTHER TRIBE “GETS IT”. —“It’s weird, I find myself agreeing wit

    MADE MY DAY. ANOTHER TRIBE “GETS IT”.

    —“It’s weird, I find myself agreeing with a lot of what white nationalists say and I can’t dispute their conclusions but I think the best thing for me to do is improve my own nation. Thanks to what I’ve learned from you I know quite a bit on what needs to be done”— A Friend

    That’s what I want to do. Stop us from fighting each other for dominance, and to take care of our own.

    (And stop white people from fucking up everything for the purpose of self congratulatory virtue signals.)

    Every people can transcend.

    The problem is just the number of people at the bottom of each nation preventing the possibility of forming institutions that allow the rest to ascend.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-12 13:11:00 UTC

  • “There are no such thing as races, subraces…99% of anthropologists agree…”–

    —“There are no such thing as races, subraces…99% of anthropologists agree…”—

    Appeal to majority fallacy. Appeal to authority fallacy. Appeal to self reporting fallacy. Appeal to statistics fallacy. (Do I need to list more of them?)

    1) is it possible to classify people into categories of major races, minor races, subraces, tribes, clans, and families. (yes evidently so. it’s been done on geographic, linguistic, cultural, archeological migration, morphological, blood type, and genetic testing and is remarkably consistent)

    2) do these classifications carry visibly morphological or empirically genetic correspondence (yes)

    3) How many samples of a kin group do we need to trace their relations (~1000 to get within 3%), (why? genes are complicated and we do not know the causal relations, we can only now identify a few common markers, so we must output-test morphology (evidentiary features)as well as input test our limited understanding of markers.

    4) what degree of precision do we need to falsify morphological, historical, linguistic, cultural differences? (given the colloquial measure that we are very little different from chimps, the degree of precision necessary to genetically falsify categories is ‘near complete’.)

    5) do these evident categories correspond to evolutionary, reproductive, linguistic, and cultural records? (yes)

    6) do people self identify with these categories? (yes)

    7) do people demonstrate preference in association for these categories. (yes, in all walks of life)

    8) do people demonstrate kin selection according to these classifications? (yes)

    9) do people in democratic countries vote by these categories (yes, when demographic distributions are to their advantage)

    10) do people in all countries report preferences (surveys) differently from how they demonstrate preferences (economic, marital, dating, friendship, phone calls, text messages, business relationships) (yes, universally – which is why the polling industry is in such a crisis)

    11) do people in the the media, academy, state, and church historically lie about scientific theories and facts that would cause them disfavor with their customer bases? (yes, always and everywhere)

    12) do people in the academy and the sciences demonstrate paradigm anchoring so severely that that they block research that contradicts their investments, and often paradigm reformation occurs only after prior paradigm authors have died? (yes)

    13) do people in the social sciences demonstrate the highest rates of falsehood in the publications of papers, books, and articles? (yes)

    14) does all the evidence lead us to conclude that reported opinions by social scientists differ from the scientific evidence? (yes).

    99% of psychologists *report* that iq has no meaning.

    Pretty much the entire social science profession other than economics is pseudoscience.

    In economics we know (finally) why much of economics is pseudoscience. (data. method. cherry-picking and selective accounting. political bias, moral bias, class bias. gender bias..)

    Don’t get me started on ‘global warming/cooling/climate change’. Or that we don’t have too many people living on the planet, or …..

    Please do not come to a gunfight with a squirt gun. I don’t like having to waste my time defending myself against the room-temperature-iq crowd. You’re clearly a well intended useful idiot indoctrinated into marxist and postmodern pseudoscience just as the church indoctrinated centuries of idiots before you.

    But thanks for forcing me to make this list so that I can use it over and over again.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 17:43:00 UTC