Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • IT’S NOT JUST THE ALT RIGHT, BUT ALL THE RIGHT. (from comment on salon) The Alt

    IT’S NOT JUST THE ALT RIGHT, BUT ALL THE RIGHT.

    (from comment on salon)

    The Alt Right’s online efforts are …

    – ANTI-POSTMODERNISM,

    – ANTI FEMINISM,

    – ANTI-MARXISM,

    – ANTI-MULTI-CULTURALISM

    … and their responses to any appeal to false consensus, are immediate and endless.

    They adopted the technique from the Alinsky Left (talk over, shout down, repeat talking points, straw man, ridicule. ) ).

    It is almost impossible for women (or beta males) to speak independently of false consensus, and the Alt Right’s Zero-Tolerance principle takes down weak men and nearly all the women along with it. They will go after their own weak as well, and drive out all but the dedicated.

    The Right’s factions …

    – New Right (Legal and Economic),

    – Traditional Right (Normative, Religious, and Educational), and

    – Alt Right(political and propaganda), along with the

    – Paleo Conservatives and

    – Paleo Libertarians

    each conduct arguments against …

    – Postmodernism( Outright Lying and Denialism ),

    – Feminism (Female Supremacy),

    – Neo Marxism( Pseudoscience), and

    – Multiculturalism (White Genocide)

    ….but each does so with different language.

    You only SEE the Alt Right Because they are loud and aggressive. But the rest of the Right simply ignores you (the left) and lets the Alt Right occupy you while we move policy forward.

    Why? Because you are right. All that matters is power. So we will simply exert power and stop trying to constrain you to truth, rule of law, reciprocity, meritocracy, and family and kin as the central purpose of policy.

    You never expected us to adopt your strategy did you?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-04 17:45:00 UTC

  • It’s Not Just The Alt Right, But All The Right.

    (from comment on salon) The Alt Right’s online efforts are … – ANTI-POSTMODERNISM, – ANTI FEMINISM, – ANTI-MARXISM, – ANTI-MULTI-CULTURALISM … and their responses to any appeal to false consensus, are immediate and endless. They adopted the technique from the Alinsky Left (talk over, shout down, repeat talking points, straw man, ridicule. ) ). It is almost impossible for women (or beta males) to speak independently of false consensus, and the Alt Right’s Zero-Tolerance principle takes down weak men and nearly all the women along with it. They will go after their own weak as well, and drive out all but the dedicated. The Right’s factions … – New Right (Legal and Economic), – Traditional Right (Normative, Religious, and Educational), and – Alt Right(political and propaganda), along with the – Paleo Conservatives and – Paleo Libertarians each conduct arguments against … – Postmodernism( Outright Lying and Denialism ), – Feminism (Female Supremacy), – Neo Marxism( Pseudoscience), and – Multiculturalism (White Genocide) ….but each does so with different language. You only SEE the Alt Right Because they are loud and aggressive. But the rest of the Right simply ignores you (the left) and lets the Alt Right occupy you while we move policy forward. Why? Because you are right. All that matters is power. So we will simply exert power and stop trying to constrain you to truth, rule of law, reciprocity, meritocracy, and family and kin as the central purpose of policy. You never expected us to adopt your strategy did you? Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • “And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto othe

    —“And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto other people by any form of colonization (conquest, religion, immigration), then the world would be a more decent place.”— Quote Repeated by Howard Van Der Klauw

  • “And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto othe

    —“And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto other people by any form of colonization (conquest, religion, immigration), then the world would be a more decent place.”— Quote Repeated by Howard Van Der Klauw

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 15:54:00 UTC

  • “And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto othe

    —“And if we all took care of our own people rather than exporting costs onto other people by any form of colonization (conquest, religion, immigration), then the world would be a more decent place.”— Quote Repeated by Howard Van Der Klauw

  • by Simon Ström —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits

    by Simon Ström

    —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits between races, because although I agree with it otherwise, I don’t think Curt’s model is complete.

    Genetic traits are not merely more or less frequent among different groups; they are often also entirely fixed (everybody in group X has it) or completely weeded out (nobody in group X has it), especially if a trait consistently proves to have an evolutionary advantage (or disadvantage).

    Skin color is a very trivial but powerful example: you will never find a black-skinned European except in rare cases of de novo mutations (diseases) and subsequent familial heredity.

    There are millions of SNPs that are fixed among all humans as a species, and even among all mammals, etc, because they are crucial for fetal development, for properly working coagulation systems, neuronal communication, oxygen transport, etc.”—

    Correct. Although, again, I always prefix my statement with “meaningful” or “substantial” differences. And I mean this ONLY in the context of everyone’s ability to suppress their underclasses and produce higher trust polities by doing so.

    So by ‘meaningful’ I mean only that any existential human group that produces a distribution above 100 (or 105, more likely), under rule of law by the common natural law of reciprocity, should be able to construct a sovereign (libertarian) high trust polity.

    That ashkenazi will always be better with language, east asians better at math, and aryans (europeans) better at invention(creativity), and africans better at socialization, is just what the data tells us. I can’t levy judgment on the hindus because what ‘keeps them down’ (at least appears) to be cultural. There exist two great races that I know of: the Japanese and the Germanic. One that has potential (the russian). And I am certain the japanese have chosen survival. India will get there with time. I think China will get there with time. The rest of the world depends entirely on demographic shifts, and how successful the market is at reallocating reproduction upward.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 15:28:00 UTC

  • by Simon Ström —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits

    by Simon Ström —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits between races, because although I agree with it otherwise, I don’t think Curt’s model is complete. Genetic traits are not merely more or less frequent among different groups; they are often also entirely fixed (everybody in group X has it) or completely weeded out (nobody in group X has it), especially if a trait consistently proves to have an evolutionary advantage (or disadvantage). Skin color is a very trivial but powerful example: you will never find a black-skinned European except in rare cases of de novo mutations (diseases) and subsequent familial heredity. There are millions of SNPs that are fixed among all humans as a species, and even among all mammals, etc, because they are crucial for fetal development, for properly working coagulation systems, neuronal communication, oxygen transport, etc.”— Correct. Although, again, I always prefix my statement with “meaningful” or “substantial” differences. And I mean this ONLY in the context of everyone’s ability to suppress their underclasses and produce higher trust polities by doing so. So by ‘meaningful’ I mean only that any existential human group that produces a distribution above 100 (or 105, more likely), under rule of law by the common natural law of reciprocity, should be able to construct a sovereign (libertarian) high trust polity. That ashkenazi will always be better with language, east asians better at math, and aryans (europeans) better at invention(creativity), and africans better at socialization, is just what the data tells us. I can’t levy judgment on the hindus because what ‘keeps them down’ (at least appears) to be cultural. There exist two great races that I know of: the Japanese and the Germanic. One that has potential (the russian). And I am certain the japanese have chosen survival. India will get there with time. I think China will get there with time. The rest of the world depends entirely on demographic shifts, and how successful the market is at reallocating reproduction upward.

  • by Simon Ström —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits

    by Simon Ström —“I need to comment on the differential distribution of traits between races, because although I agree with it otherwise, I don’t think Curt’s model is complete. Genetic traits are not merely more or less frequent among different groups; they are often also entirely fixed (everybody in group X has it) or completely weeded out (nobody in group X has it), especially if a trait consistently proves to have an evolutionary advantage (or disadvantage). Skin color is a very trivial but powerful example: you will never find a black-skinned European except in rare cases of de novo mutations (diseases) and subsequent familial heredity. There are millions of SNPs that are fixed among all humans as a species, and even among all mammals, etc, because they are crucial for fetal development, for properly working coagulation systems, neuronal communication, oxygen transport, etc.”— Correct. Although, again, I always prefix my statement with “meaningful” or “substantial” differences. And I mean this ONLY in the context of everyone’s ability to suppress their underclasses and produce higher trust polities by doing so. So by ‘meaningful’ I mean only that any existential human group that produces a distribution above 100 (or 105, more likely), under rule of law by the common natural law of reciprocity, should be able to construct a sovereign (libertarian) high trust polity. That ashkenazi will always be better with language, east asians better at math, and aryans (europeans) better at invention(creativity), and africans better at socialization, is just what the data tells us. I can’t levy judgment on the hindus because what ‘keeps them down’ (at least appears) to be cultural. There exist two great races that I know of: the Japanese and the Germanic. One that has potential (the russian). And I am certain the japanese have chosen survival. India will get there with time. I think China will get there with time. The rest of the world depends entirely on demographic shifts, and how successful the market is at reallocating reproduction upward.

  • LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FA

    LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES.

    We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer.

    —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’

    Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE.

    The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses.

    The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth.

    As far as I know, that’s the science.

    My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy.

    If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 12:59:00 UTC

  • Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.

    We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.