Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • DEFINING ETHNICITY KINSHIP: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Subrace > Race TERR

    DEFINING ETHNICITY

    KINSHIP: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Subrace > Race

    TERRITORY: Occupied Lands(privately insured) > Country(Militia Insured) > State(institutionally insured) > Empire (insured by external institutions)

    GOVERNMENT: The resolution of disputes(judiciary)(negative), and production of commons (positive) : Headman > Chieftain > King(private) > Oligarchy(Private corporation) > Bureaucracy (Public-corporation / State ) > Theocracy of any kind.

    CULTURE: (I tend to argue culture = evolved group evolutionary strategy.) *The categories and rules of disambiguation and decidability by means of Myths, Rituals, and Feasts(celebrations), and the traditions (intergenerational transfer) and norms (generational transfer) that assist in generational and intergenerational cooperation internally, and competition, externally.

    ETHNICITY: was invented during the early 1960’s postmodern invasion (destruction) of western civilization (aristocracy, meritocracy, sovereignty, truth) as a means of circumventing the traditional framing of human organizations as kin groups and circumventing the word “Race”, and framing (propagandizing) kinship (family/tribe/race) as subordinate to nation-state, or communist empire. (Yes, really, people program your frames just as they program our various fashions, and by the same means.)

    In other words “**Ethnicity**” is another attempt to force globalization (destruction of western civilization) as a kin group down western people’s high trust (naive) throats through virtue signaling.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-05 23:16:00 UTC

  • Defining Ethnicity

    KINSHIP: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Subrace > Race TERRITORY: Occupied Lands(privately insured) > Country(Militia Insured) > State(institutionally insured) > Empire (insured by external institutions) GOVERNMENT: The resolution of disputes(judiciary)(negative), and production of commons (positive) : Headman > Chieftain > King(private) > Oligarchy(Private corporation) > Bureaucracy (Public-corporation / State ) > Theocracy of any kind. CULTURE: (I tend to argue culture = evolved group evolutionary strategy.) *The categories and rules of disambiguation and decidability by means of Myths, Rituals, and Feasts(celebrations), and the traditions (intergenerational transfer) and norms (generational transfer) that assist in generational and intergenerational cooperation internally, and competition, externally. ETHNICITY: was invented during the early 1960’s postmodern invasion (destruction) of western civilization (aristocracy, meritocracy, sovereignty, truth) as a means of circumventing the traditional framing of human organizations as kin groups and circumventing the word “Race”, and framing (propagandizing) kinship (family/tribe/race) as subordinate to nation-state, or communist empire. (Yes, really, people program your frames just as they program our various fashions, and by the same means.) In other words “**Ethnicity**” is another attempt to force globalization (destruction of western civilization) as a kin group down western people’s high trust (naive) throats through virtue signaling.

  • Defining Ethnicity

    KINSHIP: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Subrace > Race TERRITORY: Occupied Lands(privately insured) > Country(Militia Insured) > State(institutionally insured) > Empire (insured by external institutions) GOVERNMENT: The resolution of disputes(judiciary)(negative), and production of commons (positive) : Headman > Chieftain > King(private) > Oligarchy(Private corporation) > Bureaucracy (Public-corporation / State ) > Theocracy of any kind. CULTURE: (I tend to argue culture = evolved group evolutionary strategy.) *The categories and rules of disambiguation and decidability by means of Myths, Rituals, and Feasts(celebrations), and the traditions (intergenerational transfer) and norms (generational transfer) that assist in generational and intergenerational cooperation internally, and competition, externally. ETHNICITY: was invented during the early 1960’s postmodern invasion (destruction) of western civilization (aristocracy, meritocracy, sovereignty, truth) as a means of circumventing the traditional framing of human organizations as kin groups and circumventing the word “Race”, and framing (propagandizing) kinship (family/tribe/race) as subordinate to nation-state, or communist empire. (Yes, really, people program your frames just as they program our various fashions, and by the same means.) In other words “**Ethnicity**” is another attempt to force globalization (destruction of western civilization) as a kin group down western people’s high trust (naive) throats through virtue signaling.

  • YOU THIS WOULD HAPPEN. This is all of our futures.Updated Mar 3, 2018, 8:20 PM

    http://www.newsweek.com/thousands-sign-petition-asking-trump-allow-white-people-south-africa-migrate-826126TOLD YOU THIS WOULD HAPPEN.

    This is all of our futures.Updated Mar 3, 2018, 8:20 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 20:20:00 UTC

  • The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to

    The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to revolt and separate, so that the affordability of group specialization loosed by the harnessing of hydrocarbons and electricity, is not inhibited by our incompatible demands of the commons. #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 15:44:00 UTC

  • SIGN AND SHARE THIS PETITION TO GIVE IMMIGRATION PRIORITY TO SOUTH AFRICAN FARME

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/immigration-priority-south-african-farmers-facing-systematic-land-confiscations-and-murderPLEASE SIGN AND SHARE THIS PETITION TO GIVE IMMIGRATION PRIORITY TO SOUTH AFRICAN FARMERSUpdated Mar 3, 2018, 8:05 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-03 08:05:00 UTC

  • The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to

    The only solution to the incompatibility of group evolutionary strategies, is to revolt and separate, so that the affordability of group specialization loosed by the harnessing of hydrocarbons and electricity, is not inhibited by our incompatible demands of the commons. #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 23:31:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/969716847363928070

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”—

    It depends upon two factors:

    a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and

    b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot.

    I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-02 21:34:00 UTC