Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: There are some questions that you should not ask becaus

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: There are some questions that you should not ask because they produce answers you will not like. It is my job to answer uncomfortable questions so I’ll give you the respect of the correct answer, if you’ll respect that it might be unpleasant. Persians divided from common…

  • You have to be kidding? It will take the educated person less than three days to

    You have to be kidding? It will take the educated person less than three days to compile a set of data from any given year from the dawn of the web, to show that the most overrepresented and most prolific voices are Jewish – it’s the reason for Jewish success: opinion exposition.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:41:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975834625896599553

    Reply addressees: @tcjfs

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975603954452238338

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975603954452238338

  • There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has b

    There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has been, even in the USA whites still associate by european ancestry. Islamists and jews never integrate anywhere. Why, if the Levant failed over and over again “Will this time be different?” IT WON’T

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:26:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975830849374621697

    Reply addressees: @TOQJoyce

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370

  • RT @jordanbpeterson: Unhappy identity-politics alt-righters: “The Western World

    RT @jordanbpeterson: Unhappy identity-politics alt-righters: “The Western World wasn’t always markedly tribal, but it sure is now, owing to…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 12:03:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975704431382712325

  • Cultural Specialization Requires National Specialization

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter: 1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford? 2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth. 3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples? 4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?

  • Cultural Specialization Requires National Specialization

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter: 1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford? 2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth. 3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples? 4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?

  • CULTURAL SPECIALIZATION REQUIRES NATIONAL SPECIALIZATION To Jonathan Haidt via t

    CULTURAL SPECIALIZATION REQUIRES NATIONAL SPECIALIZATION

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter:

    1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford?

    2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth.

    3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples?

    4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 08:06:00 UTC

  • 2) Question Part Two: So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to pre

    2) Question Part Two: So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 00:52:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975535363132358659

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212

  • Jonathan: Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences,

    Jonathan: Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 00:49:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975534716618145793

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617420366643212

  • Are There Any Benefits To Being White In American Society?

    There are worldwide benefits to being white, for the simple reason that we are less suspect of malfeasance because in reality other than the japanese we are statistically less likely to engage in malfeasance. This has largely to do with the fact that we have self-domesticated ourselves over 4000 years if not 20000 years, by the aggressive suppression of behaviors that cannot be suppressed in other territories and climates. In other words, stereotypes are extremely accurate predictors – the most accurate predictors in the social sciences. Only americans deny that for some reason.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-benefits-to-being-white-in-American-society