Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • THE POPULATION

    https://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652AGAINST THE POPULATION

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-30 16:26:00 UTC

  • The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation

    Mandatory Reading. The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation  (local Copy) Abstract Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation. By tracking evolution across time, we find individual differences between evolving worlds in terms of early humanitarian competition with ethnocentrism, including early stages of humanitarian dominance. Our evidence indicates that such variation, in terms of differences between humanitarian and ethnocentric agents, is normally distributed and due to early, rather than later, stochastic differences in immigrant strategies. Keywords: Ethnocentrism, Evolution of Cooperation, Evolutionary Game Theory, Minimal Cognition, Prisoner’s Dilemma Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16 (3) 7 <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html> DOI: 10.18564/jasss.2176 Published: 30-Jun-2013

  • The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation

    Mandatory Reading. The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation  (local Copy) Abstract Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation. By tracking evolution across time, we find individual differences between evolving worlds in terms of early humanitarian competition with ethnocentrism, including early stages of humanitarian dominance. Our evidence indicates that such variation, in terms of differences between humanitarian and ethnocentric agents, is normally distributed and due to early, rather than later, stochastic differences in immigrant strategies. Keywords: Ethnocentrism, Evolution of Cooperation, Evolutionary Game Theory, Minimal Cognition, Prisoner’s Dilemma Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16 (3) 7 <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html> DOI: 10.18564/jasss.2176 Published: 30-Jun-2013

  • The Jewish, Gypsy and Muslim worlds have practiced cosmopolitanism (Territorial

    The Jewish, Gypsy and Muslim worlds have practiced cosmopolitanism (Territorial Communism) for millennia. Given that those civilizations have been catastrophic failures without high trust peoples to parasitically survive upon, why would cosmopolitanism work ‘this time’? It wont.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 15:59:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/979387625902624768

  • via outsideness. “Despite Reich’s occasional need to stop his otherwise lucid na

    via outsideness.

    “Despite Reich’s occasional need to stop his otherwise lucid narrative to spew irrational rage against his fellow race-science heretics … the genome expert conclusively demolishes the post-Boasian anthropologists’ conventional wisdom.”

    … “Reich’s laboratory has found that the old Robert E. Howard version is actually pretty much what happened.”

    … “After 1066, the island race enjoyed a long halcyon era without new invaders raping and pillaging. But all good things evidently have to come to an end.”

    … History is basically genocide and rape, with a little additional surface detailing.

    … What you are in its biological fundamentals is whoever raped over you last.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-29 12:12:00 UTC

  • on the intelligence of modern Aborigines. They have an average IQ of 64, compare

    …. on the intelligence of modern Aborigines. They have an average IQ of 64, compared to about 70 for Sub-Saharan Africans, 85 for African Americans and 100 for whites. An IQ of below 70, in Western countries, has you classified as mentally retarded. So, the average 18-year-old Aborigine has the mental age of 11. … In the UK, it has been found that 4% of whites and 10% of blacks have mental health problems—particularly schizophrenia in the case of blacks.” It has been estimated that this is true of over 50% of Aborigines.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 22:03:00 UTC

  • Again, let’s repeat: “Cosmopolitanism is genetic communism, just as socialism is

    Again, let’s repeat: “Cosmopolitanism is genetic communism, just as socialism is private property communism, just as libertarianism is common property communism, just as neo-conservatism is national communism.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 18:34:00 UTC

  • 2)Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as

    2)Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as has economic communism(socialism), and legal communism (libertarianism).Yet people pursue heterogeneous polities despite only homogenous polities exiting poverty, corruption, low trust, and tribalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 14:52:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978645888171167745

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978597888417783809

  • —“How does one create a nation state and at the same time does not offend other ethnic minorities? “—

    —“How does one create a nation state and at the same time does not offend other ethnic minorities?”— This is a fascinating question because it demonstrates a cultural difference between western and non-western cultures. The founding principle of western civilization is that you have no ‘right’ to respect, or freedom from ‘offense’, whatsoever, because the evidentiary truth is more important to the people than your status or self image. We see ‘offending’ as ‘teaching the ignorant’. The purpose of a nation state is to prevent competition from obtaining political power. Hence the success of monarchies, and constitutional monarchies, and chinese bureaucracies, over the more primitive peoples of the world. Once deprived of ability to obtain power by political or religious means, a people has only commerce by which to obtain power, and commerce is meritocratic.

  • —“How does one create a nation state and at the same time does not offend other ethnic minorities? “—

    —“How does one create a nation state and at the same time does not offend other ethnic minorities?”— This is a fascinating question because it demonstrates a cultural difference between western and non-western cultures. The founding principle of western civilization is that you have no ‘right’ to respect, or freedom from ‘offense’, whatsoever, because the evidentiary truth is more important to the people than your status or self image. We see ‘offending’ as ‘teaching the ignorant’. The purpose of a nation state is to prevent competition from obtaining political power. Hence the success of monarchies, and constitutional monarchies, and chinese bureaucracies, over the more primitive peoples of the world. Once deprived of ability to obtain power by political or religious means, a people has only commerce by which to obtain power, and commerce is meritocratic.