Theme: Ethnoculture
-
Hence Why Europeans Need Their Empire of Nation States Under Our Own “White”: Natural Law
—“Our field’s fixation on the Westphalian state has tended to obscure the fact that the main actors in global politics, for most of time immemorial, have been empires rather than states … In fact, it is a very distorted view of even the Westphalian era not to recognize that it was always at least as much about empires as it was states. Almost all of the emerging European states no sooner began to consolidate than they were off on campaigns of conquest and commerce to the farthest reaches of the globe… Ironically, it was the European empires that carried the idea of the sovereign territorial state to the rest of the world…”— Burbank and Cooper -
Hence Why Europeans Need Their Empire of Nation States Under Our Own “White”: Natural Law
—“Our field’s fixation on the Westphalian state has tended to obscure the fact that the main actors in global politics, for most of time immemorial, have been empires rather than states … In fact, it is a very distorted view of even the Westphalian era not to recognize that it was always at least as much about empires as it was states. Almost all of the emerging European states no sooner began to consolidate than they were off on campaigns of conquest and commerce to the farthest reaches of the globe… Ironically, it was the European empires that carried the idea of the sovereign territorial state to the rest of the world…”— Burbank and Cooper -
Three Books – A Hostile Elite
THE FATAL EMBRACE – JEWS AND THE STATE THE PEOPLE THAT SHALL DWELL ALONE A WARNING TO THE WEST https://www.amazon.com/Warning-West-Aleksandr-Solzhenitsyn/dp/0374513341/
-
Three Books – A Hostile Elite
THE FATAL EMBRACE – JEWS AND THE STATE THE PEOPLE THAT SHALL DWELL ALONE A WARNING TO THE WEST https://www.amazon.com/Warning-West-Aleksandr-Solzhenitsyn/dp/0374513341/
-
—-”Soon the world will be filled with mixed race people. Will racism and prejudice therefore end?”—-
It won’t happen. (Really). A limited number of social orders are possible: i) genetically imperial (Han Chinese, Russian Empire), ii) large hierarchy of casts (india), iii) small homogenous and dynamic (europe, japan). iv) tyrannical hetero-tribal, v) failed peoples that cannot hold territory (diasporic unlanded people). Every experience with heterogeneity has failed. (Middle East, Brazil, and most obviously, India.) The most successful states are homogenous kin groups (China, Korea, Japan, the nordics, and until recently western europe.) The Chinese/Japanese/Korean civilization will very soon dominate the world economic and political sphere, and their racial exclusion will be copied by the rest of the world. The problem isn’t racism. The problem is that most unsuccessful races, subraces, tribes, and clans, consist of excessively large underclasses whose standards of living cannot be satisfied now that the advantages of western technology have been redistributed. Look at brazil. Look at the USA. The ‘whites’ are trying to separate. The jews remain separated. The diasporic chinese separate. It’s underclass peoples that commingle. The optimum social order is homogenous, for the simple reason that we redistribute to kin and resist redistribution to competitors. The optimum possible social and political order is kinship. (Do the research) Kin selection is an evolutionary advantage. (Do the research) The experiment with Democracy has largely failed. (Do the research)
-
—-”Soon the world will be filled with mixed race people. Will racism and prejudice therefore end?”—-
It won’t happen. (Really). A limited number of social orders are possible: i) genetically imperial (Han Chinese, Russian Empire), ii) large hierarchy of casts (india), iii) small homogenous and dynamic (europe, japan). iv) tyrannical hetero-tribal, v) failed peoples that cannot hold territory (diasporic unlanded people). Every experience with heterogeneity has failed. (Middle East, Brazil, and most obviously, India.) The most successful states are homogenous kin groups (China, Korea, Japan, the nordics, and until recently western europe.) The Chinese/Japanese/Korean civilization will very soon dominate the world economic and political sphere, and their racial exclusion will be copied by the rest of the world. The problem isn’t racism. The problem is that most unsuccessful races, subraces, tribes, and clans, consist of excessively large underclasses whose standards of living cannot be satisfied now that the advantages of western technology have been redistributed. Look at brazil. Look at the USA. The ‘whites’ are trying to separate. The jews remain separated. The diasporic chinese separate. It’s underclass peoples that commingle. The optimum social order is homogenous, for the simple reason that we redistribute to kin and resist redistribution to competitors. The optimum possible social and political order is kinship. (Do the research) Kin selection is an evolutionary advantage. (Do the research) The experiment with Democracy has largely failed. (Do the research)
-
—“Can a country lose its cultural heritage if the country borrows from other cultures, which become a part of their culture as well?”—
We have all borrowed from one another for all of history. And those isolated areas that could not borrow from others not only didn’t improve, but in many cases (New Zealand, Australia) regressed. (I am still studying the empires of west Africa and it’s possibly been a problem there also.) However, borrowing isn’t always voluntary, and borrowing isn’t always good. Islam has been a destructive force everywhere it’s been adopted – although to different degrees, judaism (membership), christianity (resistance), islam (rule) were spread by coercion rather than choice. So we can import good things (metallurgy, engineering, farming practices), or we can import bad things (lower trust, political competition, underclasses) or we can import really bad things (means of deception, means of propagandizing, means of coercion, means of rule).
-
—“Can a country lose its cultural heritage if the country borrows from other cultures, which become a part of their culture as well?”—
We have all borrowed from one another for all of history. And those isolated areas that could not borrow from others not only didn’t improve, but in many cases (New Zealand, Australia) regressed. (I am still studying the empires of west Africa and it’s possibly been a problem there also.) However, borrowing isn’t always voluntary, and borrowing isn’t always good. Islam has been a destructive force everywhere it’s been adopted – although to different degrees, judaism (membership), christianity (resistance), islam (rule) were spread by coercion rather than choice. So we can import good things (metallurgy, engineering, farming practices), or we can import bad things (lower trust, political competition, underclasses) or we can import really bad things (means of deception, means of propagandizing, means of coercion, means of rule).
-
End The Immigration of Labor
The nuclear family lets itself to a village where extended family is nearby and children move between households to provide labor rather than paying the cost of slaves. (really, that’s the answer). The nuclear family requires very cheap land. This is probably the most overlooked cost. The benefit of the nuclear household and shared labor, is that (a) it’s possible for family capital to be mobile, (b) it prevents dysgenia from slavery, (c) delays childbirth, and (d) prevents dysgenia from underclass reproduction. The nuclear family is also superior under early capitalism where we move people to capital. The problem is, it’s destructive. Move capital to people rather than people to capital. END IMMIGRATION OF LABOR.
-
End The Immigration of Labor
The nuclear family lets itself to a village where extended family is nearby and children move between households to provide labor rather than paying the cost of slaves. (really, that’s the answer). The nuclear family requires very cheap land. This is probably the most overlooked cost. The benefit of the nuclear household and shared labor, is that (a) it’s possible for family capital to be mobile, (b) it prevents dysgenia from slavery, (c) delays childbirth, and (d) prevents dysgenia from underclass reproduction. The nuclear family is also superior under early capitalism where we move people to capital. The problem is, it’s destructive. Move capital to people rather than people to capital. END IMMIGRATION OF LABOR.