Theme: Ethnoculture

  • Understanding Our Varied Mythos

    Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉

  • Understanding Our Varied Mythos

    Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉

  • “Curt Doolittle why do white People constantly attack each other?”—Murray Sell

    —“Curt Doolittle why do white People constantly attack each other?”—Murray Sell

    It is ‘heroic’ in our culture to stand up and fight, and ‘failure’ in pursuit of those heroic ends, is still heroic. It’s hard for other peoples to understand individualism. It works brilliantly. It’s just counter-intuitive. There is no faster, better, means of ‘calculating’.

    In the end, all that matters is ‘we fight as one’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 12:23:00 UTC

  • IQ And Demand For Fluidity Of Speech

    It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose the same fluidity of sentences, just as it requires a male of higher IQ to speak with the fluidity of women. Just as the east asians very rarely approximate european levels of speech despite what certainly appears to be higher intelligence. I want to understand this. Meaning I want to understand if its true, or if it’s a problem of language. I know that by developing propertarianism I developed a language for speaking what I could not speak rationally without it. But retraining yourself to speak in the ‘economic transactions’ of operational propertarian speech is as hard as learning another language. I think that if we were taught this language from a young age, that we would think as much more clearly about the world (and better voice our ideas) as we did between religion and empiricism.
    Apr 15, 2018 9:07am
  • IQ And Demand For Fluidity Of Speech

    It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose the same fluidity of sentences, just as it requires a male of higher IQ to speak with the fluidity of women. Just as the east asians very rarely approximate european levels of speech despite what certainly appears to be higher intelligence. I want to understand this. Meaning I want to understand if its true, or if it’s a problem of language. I know that by developing propertarianism I developed a language for speaking what I could not speak rationally without it. But retraining yourself to speak in the ‘economic transactions’ of operational propertarian speech is as hard as learning another language. I think that if we were taught this language from a young age, that we would think as much more clearly about the world (and better voice our ideas) as we did between religion and empiricism.
    Apr 15, 2018 9:07am
  • —“How do you explain that France is degenerating fastest?”—

    —“…French…”—Lukas Rosenbaum How do you explain that france is degenerating fastest, that france has repeatedly tried to move the capital to french territory, that france failed to adopt protestantism, that france could not defend herself during the medieval era, that france originated the counter-enligthenment, that france was too weak to defend herself after revolution and napoleonic era, that napoleonic france ended the european era of private states and created financialized total war, and that france contributed almost nothing to civilization afterward? France is the most authoritarian country in europe and only vaguely less harmful than russia. Although… the french-russian cultural alliance has been long standing for those authoritarian reasons. How do you explain the fact that every french colony is a disaster and every english colony is not? Authoritarianism. The vulnerability of anglo civ is a common vulnerability of all naval empires which bias to excessive liberalism, just as land empires bias toward corruption, just as diasporic peoples bias toward parasitism. We still operate as if we are a naval empire making the same mistakes as did the Athenians by fighting the spartans (germany) when the problem as always has been the phoenicians. Declining Authoritarianism and declining trust: Nordics (including english), Germanics, eastern europeans, Italians, French, Russians, Ashkenazis. There is a reason that the germans and english use the most truthful, honest, and conciliatory language in negotiation, of all the world the french use the most dishonest and threatening language in negotiations. (look it up.) The french heartland might be german, but the cancer upon europe that is paris is distinctly effeminate (byzantine).

  • —“How do you explain that France is degenerating fastest?”—

    —“…French…”—Lukas Rosenbaum How do you explain that france is degenerating fastest, that france has repeatedly tried to move the capital to french territory, that france failed to adopt protestantism, that france could not defend herself during the medieval era, that france originated the counter-enligthenment, that france was too weak to defend herself after revolution and napoleonic era, that napoleonic france ended the european era of private states and created financialized total war, and that france contributed almost nothing to civilization afterward? France is the most authoritarian country in europe and only vaguely less harmful than russia. Although… the french-russian cultural alliance has been long standing for those authoritarian reasons. How do you explain the fact that every french colony is a disaster and every english colony is not? Authoritarianism. The vulnerability of anglo civ is a common vulnerability of all naval empires which bias to excessive liberalism, just as land empires bias toward corruption, just as diasporic peoples bias toward parasitism. We still operate as if we are a naval empire making the same mistakes as did the Athenians by fighting the spartans (germany) when the problem as always has been the phoenicians. Declining Authoritarianism and declining trust: Nordics (including english), Germanics, eastern europeans, Italians, French, Russians, Ashkenazis. There is a reason that the germans and english use the most truthful, honest, and conciliatory language in negotiation, of all the world the french use the most dishonest and threatening language in negotiations. (look it up.) The french heartland might be german, but the cancer upon europe that is paris is distinctly effeminate (byzantine).

  • It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose t

    It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose the same fluidity of sentences, just as it requires a male of higher IQ to speak with the fluidity of women. Just as the east asians very rarely approximate european levels of speech despite what certainly appears to be higher intelligence.

    I want to understand this. Meaning I want to understand if its true, or if it’s a problem of language.

    I know that by developing propertarianism I developed a language for speaking what I could not speak rationally without it. But retraining yourself to speak in the ‘economic transactions’ of operational propertarian speech is as hard as learning another language.

    I think that if we were taught this language from a young age, that we would think as much more clearly about the world (and better voice our ideas) as we did between religion and empiricism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:07:00 UTC

  • Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that

    Our people suffer because their high trust is exploitable via rents, where that high trust is not exploitable by credit rents elsewhere.

    To eliminate this parasitism, we have the choice to cease trustworthiness or to destroy rents.

    As such I choose, and I am certain we will all choose, to destroy those rents.

    By destroying rents we will force investments into innovation at risk rather than parasitism on the externalization of risk.

    Correcting the rent system is actually quite easy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-14 09:23:00 UTC

  • It’s not a gene, its that our development is being repressed in order to educate

    It’s not a gene, its that our development is being repressed in order to educate us in the same room with girls, and with different ethnic groups that sexually mature faster than we do. We need exercise, competition, and dominance play. And to learn to compete not PLEASE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-10 21:05:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983813333626294272

    Reply addressees: @Spagaletto

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983766535574642688


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983766535574642688