The difference is that speech has been sacred in our civilization, and the opposite in (((theirs))).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 08:16:00 UTC
The difference is that speech has been sacred in our civilization, and the opposite in (((theirs))).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-18 08:16:00 UTC
If we forcibly moved all of them to Palestine, then in about four centuries they’ll be ethically protestant. Why? Landholding ethics, and high trust ethics needed to scale organizations. Either that or they’d be defeated. We forget they had a professional class but never a middle MANAGERIAL class.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-16 18:15:00 UTC
Charles: While we have increased interpersonal tolerance, we have decreased interpersonal interaction. In other words, heterogeneity and tolerance decrease sociability, and homogeneity increases sociability. The fact that this is a necessary consequence of cognition is lost.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 15:23:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996410686271115264
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995989083921973249
IN REPLY TO:
@charlesmurray
This is really good, period. That it was written by an undergraduate is extraordinary. https://t.co/Lku1llXmMW
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995989083921973249
RT @whyvert: “transformed the Eurasian steppes from being inhabited by Indo-European speakers of largely West Eurasian ancestry to the most…
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 14:40:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/996400050489188352
—“The Royal family is a bunch of Germans you brought over just before WW1. Also if you knew what European royal ancestry looked like you wouldn’t brag with it. Imo your royal family is lucky to have chins”—Rohan Mostert Um, of course they are germans. That’s a good thing. Celts have a soft streak in them that makes them weak. And photos of the present and past european royalty fare far better than the common man. I understand the effeminacy of the modern UK male, and the reversal of gender roles in the UK. So I understand the dislike of hierarchy in the feminized male. And I understand why the feminized male accepts or invites european integration and muslim immigration. Envy is a thing for women. Excellence a thing for men.
—“The Royal family is a bunch of Germans you brought over just before WW1. Also if you knew what European royal ancestry looked like you wouldn’t brag with it. Imo your royal family is lucky to have chins”—Rohan Mostert Um, of course they are germans. That’s a good thing. Celts have a soft streak in them that makes them weak. And photos of the present and past european royalty fare far better than the common man. I understand the effeminacy of the modern UK male, and the reversal of gender roles in the UK. So I understand the dislike of hierarchy in the feminized male. And I understand why the feminized male accepts or invites european integration and muslim immigration. Envy is a thing for women. Excellence a thing for men.
Once you understand (((they))) are all cognitively female, everything else they do makes perfect sense. Really. Like I said, the competitive differences between human groups are reducible to a very small number of traits that express gender differences during development. Our free will is limited by these differences. We know not what we do. We just do.
Once you understand (((they))) are all cognitively female, everything else they do makes perfect sense. Really. Like I said, the competitive differences between human groups are reducible to a very small number of traits that express gender differences during development. Our free will is limited by these differences. We know not what we do. We just do.
Retweeted Whyvert (@whyvert):
“transformed the Eurasian steppes from being inhabited by Indo-European speakers of largely West Eurasian ancestry to the mostly Turkic-speaking groups of the present day, who are primarily of East Asian ancestry.”
Why East Asian advantage: Cold adaptation? Disease resistance? https://t.co/7kbgWdz0Wi
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 10:40:00 UTC
Once you understand (((they))) are all cognitively female, everything else they do makes perfect sense. Really. Like I said, the competitive differences between human groups are reducible to a very small number of traits that express gender differences during development. Our free will is limited by these differences. We know not what we do. We just do.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-15 07:08:00 UTC