Theme: Ethnoculture

  • 1) Inbreeding (bad) < Near Breeding(good) > Outbreeding (bad) 2) the majority of

    1) Inbreeding (bad) < Near Breeding(good) > Outbreeding (bad)
    2) the majority of the clerisy consisted of second third and such sons of the nobility and aristocracy. The church was a holding company for the nobility and aristocracy because of primogeniture. the church prohibited near breeding to break up the land holdings of the great families so that the church could control the land and be the largest employer of serfs in europe. The church and the monasteries were the white collar class and the positions were oftenn sold off to the wealthy or educated for profits. This is why there were so many attempts at reforming the church from the monastic movement, to the reformation – it was the most corrupt organization in europe after the jews and their use of credit for baiting into hazard.

    If you don’t know economics you don’t know incentives and you don’t know how to read history and as such are a victim of the fact that most of it if not all is propaganda.

    Reply addressees: @DustinofApollon @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 04:10:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748920939662696448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748918901214433630

  • TERMS IN EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCE {Geography > Resources > Competitors > Demographi

    TERMS IN EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCE
    {Geography > Resources > Competitors > Demographic Composition > Stage of Development } > Group Evolutionary Strategy > Metaphysical Presumptions > Mythologies (narratives) > ~Religion(in the broad sense) > methods of conveyance > methods of argument (and lying) > Sequence of Formation of Elites > Sequence of Formation of Institutions > Anchoring Effect of the Sequence of Institutional formation > Resulting Group Strategy.)

    THE SPECTRUM OF GRAMMARS OF COGNITION:
    Definitions. Each term can be understood as follows:
    Metaphysics: The foundational branch of philosophy concerned with understanding the fundamental nature of reality and being. It involves abstract concepts such as existence, time, objecthood, and identity.

    Theology: The study of the nature of the divine, encompassing various religious beliefs and practices. Theology often interprets religious texts and seeks to understand the nature and will of deities
    .
    Philosophy: A broad field that uses reason and logic to explore fundamental questions about knowledge, existence, ethics, and the human mind. Philosophy underpins many other disciplines by providing a framework for questioning and understanding.

    Ideology: A system of beliefs or ideas, especially those that form the basis of economic, political, or social theory and policy. Ideologies shape our perception of the world and influence our actions within it.

    Empiricism: A philosophical approach that emphasizes the role of sensory experience and evidence in the formation of ideas. It argues that knowledge is primarily derived from sensory experience.

    Science: A systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. Science relies on empirical methods for gathering data and formulating theories.

    Operationalism: (first principles): Computational or Operational Logic: A field that combines logic with the principles of computation. It is concerned with the use of algorithms, computation, and formal systems to solve problems, make decisions, and understand reasoning processes.

    THE COORDINATION PROBLEM OF THE NOW
    So AFAIK we require some means of creating a metaphysical set of value judgements but the means of doing so can be any to all of the methods of conveying information above from the most intuitionistic and imaginary to the most rational and concrete – as suitable for the needs of the distribution of abilities in the population.

    But there are blocking agents in our existing thought.

    THE METAPHYSICAL BLOCKING AGENTS IN THE WEST
    The principle problem is searching for the good instead of the true – and then from the true discovering a possible good. In all known cases all religions and ideologies (and most philosophies) seek the good first and the true Is irrelevant. As such they contain the seeds of their own suicide as well as causing harms by externalities to the population as a consequence.

    Example: Spiritual Truth vs “My Truth” vs > Darwinian Truth vs > Evidentiary Truth vs > Testimonial Truth vs > ideal truth vs analytic truth: Spiritual Truth is a ‘good’ not a true, but it is true in the sense that it provides a means of decidability that provides a positive feedback in the context of the suppression of neuroticism that is endemic in uncertainty.

    Given:
    1 – All language consist of measurements
    2 – All language follows the universal grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation.
    3 – All paradigms simple permit or deny dimensions of measurement.

    And:
    1 – All logic is falsificationary not justificationary
    2 – Good first rather than true first.
    3 – Mathiness (verbalism, idealism) vs operationalism (actions, realism)
    4 – Darwinian everything is true for the above reasons.
    5 – Babbage’s failure set us back a century
    6 – philosophy and even analytic philosophy ended because of the above and was dead by the mid 1960s.
    7 – My observation is that the brain is easily explainable by a few general rules, and as such the blocking agent in matters of coordinating people by whatever Grammar (means of conveyance) is a hangover from theology philosophy and pseudoscience.

    Therefore:
    1 – So as far as I can tell, we advance in precision but in doing so advances in the grammars of abstraction. But as we advance in abstraction we can back-propagate reforms to the grammars of intuition and experience.

    So as we progress toward the most parsimonious consistency and correspondence, it should be possible to reform ideology, philosophy, and theology such that they are non-false in any meaningful way, but still provide their function which is an obtainable and usable system of reasoning suitable for the neurological organization of their brains.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-20 22:14:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748831333214793728

  • Q: LET’S SCIENCE THE RACE AND ETHNICITY ISSUE –“Race is above iQ. You need a fo

    Q: LET’S SCIENCE THE RACE AND ETHNICITY ISSUE

    –“Race is above iQ. You need a folk bound by blood”– Theobald

    Well, you’re expressing it as a preference, so how about I science it for you:

    –“Devotion in time and loyalty over time to ethnicity in reproduction, society, economics, politics, and war is an advantage over all other alternatives. And the only advantage of alternatives is trade of goods services and information that improve the responsibility, agency, productivity, and capital of the ethnicity.”–

    Why? This is why…

    Except at the margins, (very top and very bottom) of any population (ethnicity race species) ingroup cooperation whether genetic, reproductive, social, economic, or political is an advantage over outgroup cooperation because of the material differences in neotenic evolution, related personality traits, related intelligence, and accumulated genetic load (defects).

    In addition the aggregate neoteny, personality, intelligence, and genetic load composition of population is more influential on the conditions opportunities and outcomes than the same property of any given individual in that population.

    Therefore the optimum polity is a small, homogenous, low power distance, high trust, redistributive (commons) polity that is larger than the minimum reproductive threshold possibility of improvement and error correction) and smaller than the minimum divergence threshold (difficulty of improvement and error correction). This number is between ten thousand and ten million.

    But the minimum survivable polity appears to be three hundred thousand, and even then only when in association and alliance with others who, in total, constitute five to ten million.

    But even at five to ten million the survivability of those polities requires alliance into the tens to hundreds of millions for defense and trade policy.

    And subsequent alliance into the totality of others similar evolution, culture, and development for defense alone.

    This only means ‘let a thousand nations bloom’ so that we may construct polities (human intergenerational farms).
    Trading and visiting are different from cohabitating. 😉

    Cheers
    -CD

    Reply addressees: @Theobaldtho @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 18:34:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748413642872070144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748402765615755523

  • “Novels were invented by Europeans in the 1700s — for they reflect the deeper,

    —“Novels were invented by Europeans in the 1700s — for they reflect the deeper, introspective, psychological depths of Europeans.”— https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1747672884523262174

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 Staying on message: 1

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 Staying on message: 1

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://openpsych.net/paper/72/

    Staying on message:
    1 – Not all peoples are equally disposed to speak truth before face.
    2 – The lower the group’s median IQ the less likely they are able to speak truth before face.
    3 – Some… https://t.co/MCbrOmcF3m


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748141274010366267

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 Staying on message: 1

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    Staying on message:
    1 – Not all peoples are equally disposed to speak truth before face.
    2 – The lower the group’s median IQ the less likely they are able to speak truth before face.
    3 – Some populations must rely on lying to advance their collectivist religious social and politcal systems (the abrahamic cults)
    4 – Truth before face is, aside from individual self determination (sovereignty), the single most important civilizational difference between the west (whites) and the rest.

    Why? Because every single institution we value and that provides us with such a competitive advantage, and provides such a higher standard of living and quality of life, depends on it – the origin of our law, or our empiricism of our science, arts, technoligy and medicine, especially our liberty and jurty and common concurrent law – all depend on this one foundation: truth before face regardless of cost.

    And what is the left advancing? Collectivism and Lying instead. In other words cultural suicide.

    And why are women so eager to advance collectivism face before truth and ly ing to cover it?

    Because it absolves them of responsibility for defense of the behavioral commons. And women evade responsibility as much as they pursue attention and consumption. Training women to not rely on antisocial behavior is just as important if not more important than training men not to. and that’s what we have failed to do.

    Now back to the paper:

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usual zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748141273679073280

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 As if we needed more e

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usually zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748139224820301824

  • Honesty, Intelligence, and Race OpenPsych , July 17, 2023 As if we needed more e

    Honesty, Intelligence, and Race
    OpenPsych , July 17, 2023
    https://t.co/BgLLPZ2cFs

    As if we needed more evidence. The only people on earth who speak truth before face. And the entire left’s program is meant to undermine it – as is nearly every woman in the west :(. ) It’s a paper by Kirkegaard with his usually zeal.

    –“Research shows that honesty correlates positively with intelligence. Similarly, there are racial differences in honesty, with Europeans being more honest than various other ethnic groups. It is currently unknown to what degree race differences in intelligence can explain the differences in honesty. …

    We replicate prior findings that honesty correlated with measures of intelligence (r = .38, 95% CI [.34, .41]) and that Blacks (d = -0.67, 95% CI [-.76, -.59]) and Hispanics (d = -0.4, 95% CI [-.50, -.31]) are less honest than Whites, and this holds whether honesty is measured by self-reports, interviewer-reports or by parent-reports.

    In addition, race differences in honesty remained between Blacks and Whites but not between Whites and Hispanics after controlling for intelligence. Differences between Blacks and Whites but not Whites and Hispanics were noticeably lower in self-reports (Blacks: d = -0.18 [-0.24, -0.11], Hispanics: d = -0.24 [-0.31, -0.17]) than parent-reports (Blacks: d = -0.43 [-0.52, -0.35], Hispanics: -0.24 [-0.33, -0.15]) and interviewer-reports (Blacks: d = -0.7 [-0.75, -0.64], Hispanics: -0.3 [-0.36, -0.25]).

    Cross-national comparisons were made using national IQ data and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Bayesian model averaging suggests that Hofstede’s individualism dimension (β = .64, PIP = 100%), national IQs (β = .25, PIP = 73.6%), and masculinity (β = -.35, PIP = 100%) predict differences in honesty between countries.

    (CD: Meaning? Collectivism breeds dishonesty.)

    Parking violations per diplomat were only predicted by national IQs (r = -0.28, p < .001), given that no other variable reached a posterior inclusion probability above 0% besides national IQs. Implications and theories concerning these findings are discussed.”–

    (CD: I’m going to fetch that data on parking violations per diplomat and add it to my Countries table of data.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 00:23:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748139069211549697

  • “Why did France begin its fertility transition decades before the rest of the co

    –“Why did France begin its fertility transition decades before the rest of the continent?”–François Valentin

    The answer is relatively obvious and isn’t really much of an enigma.
    a) French society, particularly after the French Revolution, embraced more individualistic and secular values compared to other parts of Europe. This cultural shift contributed to a greater acceptance of birth control and smaller family sizes.
    b) The ideas of Thomas Malthus, who argued that unchecked population growth would outpace food production, were widely discussed in France. This influenced early adoption of family planning practices.
    c) France urbanized earlier than many other European countries, which contributed to the decline in birth rates.
    d) France had relatively high literacy rates and educational standards for women, which influenced family planning decisions.
    e) The weakening of the church’s influence on daily life, including its stance on birth control.
    f) Perhaps most importantly Relative decline: the catholics had outbred the protestants, and french agricultural productivity (geography) and population were the source of her relative wealth. So the french had a faster rate of adjustment than protestant or poorer regions of europe. Compare with the Irish and the consequences of the potato famine.

    Reply addressees: @Valen10Francois


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 18:01:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748042883196723200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747610484705046750

  • The Privilege of Proximity in exchange for the Cost of Conformity. Why do people

    The Privilege of Proximity in exchange for the Cost of Conformity.
    Why do people who will not fully integrate have the privilege of access to european people their culture their economy their institutions and their civilization?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 22:59:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747755459522560471