Theme: Ethnoculture

  • IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYI

    IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS.

    THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE:

    They:

    1) increased the voting pool, then

    2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then

    3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then

    4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote.

    5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants.

    6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries.

    7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation.

    VOTING

    1 – *white single women are the only defectors from any group*

    2 – *if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president*

    3 – *women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor)*

    4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces.

    WHY IT MATTERS

    Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive.

    THE LEFT’S SCRIPT

    They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society.

    UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS

    The 14th (Federal Dominion over States)

    The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation)

    The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power)

    The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote )

    The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements)

    The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.)

    UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’

    https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court…

    AND IN PARTICULAR

    Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal”

    Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts.

    Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment.

    Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity.

    New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice.

    Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional.

    UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION:

    Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law?

    NO ONE.

    AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 16:48:00 UTC

  • EASTERN VS WESTERN MISTRUST ILLUSTRATED by Emil Prelic with comments by Curt Doo

    EASTERN VS WESTERN MISTRUST ILLUSTRATED

    by Emil Prelic with comments by Curt Doolittle

    —“The rank and file right wing person is almost as much of an NPC. They simply benefit from being raised with greater moral influence (typically through church) and not being functionally retarded and/or opportunistically evil when it comes to economics (99.9% of the left).

    From the NRA to the AARP, aging right wingers share more in common with soybois and faghags than they’d like to admit vis-á-vis their support for monolithic quasi-governmental agencies.

    Go read Soros’ last speech from Davos. If you replaced the word “Trump” with “Obama” and put a bag over the old potato, it could’ve been any “right wing” leader that read it.

    The left is that loud fat ass cunt at the diner screaming about her triple-fried cheese doodles being too fattening and the right is her pencil dick tele-hubby with his nose in his plate mumbling, “yesss deaaar”.”—

    CD: I don’t share this opinion because, I think he’s missing the point about silos(packs) and monopoly(herds) And I think he’s referring to the online community and not the people-in-fact. But the element of truth is still there.

    What I *DO* see is that he’s placing greater value in the church where we place greater value in the law, because in our experience, the church was a corrupt government of lies, and in the east’s experience, much like the latin experience, it’s the government that was corrupt and the church a local community organization. Eastern Church/Morality, Western Militia/Court.

    In other words: all institutions suck if you give them power.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 12:55:00 UTC

  • Democracy becomes just a racial headcount.

    October 19th, 2018 12:15 PM

    —“Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial headcount.”—Eric Grose

  • Democracy becomes just a racial headcount.

    October 19th, 2018 12:15 PM

    —“Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial headcount.”—Eric Grose

  • “Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial

    —“Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial headcount.”—Eric Grose


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 16:16:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053318887855525889

  • “Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial

    —“Lee Kwan Yu said that in multi-ethnic societies democracy becomes just a racial headcount.”—Eric Grose


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 12:15:00 UTC

  • no they just don’t need to say it because they know it. han are the largest ethi

    no they just don’t need to say it because they know it. han are the largest ethic group and they assimilte others intentionally and slowly


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 23:21:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053063586984148994

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053029262209572867


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053029262209572867

  • SOUTH AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT by Michael Churchill Latin

    SOUTH AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT

    by Michael Churchill

    Latin America is a checkerboard with three types of squares:

    1) Western civilization (Chile, parts of Argentina, parts of Brazil, nearly all of Costa Rica, parts of Colombia, Panama, half of downtown Lima, parts of Mexico;

    2) Primitive civilizations that WORK (rural Peru and Ecuador for instance, Actually the rural parts of much of Latin America);

    3) Chaos (Much of Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, Rio favelas, Buenos Aires slums, Venezuela).

    There are all sorts of interesting possibilities for political advancement in Latin America. The mere fact that Bolsonaro EXISTS tells you it’s not just going to be a repeat of idiocy ad infinitum.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:37:00 UTC

  • A HARD QUESTION OF IDENTITY THAT BOILS DOWN TO GENETIC LOAD —“Curt, I want to

    A HARD QUESTION OF IDENTITY THAT BOILS DOWN TO GENETIC LOAD

    —“Curt, I want to ask you, as an Iberoamerican, Hispanic, or Latino American, (whatever you want to call us), What is the propertarian viewpoint of the Spanish-Portuguese conquest of Americas? Taking into cosideratión the massive and fast mixing of the “races” (Amerindians, Europeans, and Black Africans). Our countries are among the most Unequal in the world, competing with the south of Africa for IQ disparity. Are we part of the western civilization, or just some weird bastardization of it?”— A Facebook Friend (I’ll leave this one anonymous)

    (WARNING: This is an unpleasant assessment of human capital – measurements of this kind are not ‘kind’ to our emotions. But measurements can be made.)

    DEMOGRAPHICALLY, IT’S NOT COMPLICATED

    The iberian conquest of south american by european people was a near genocide, and certainly a civilization-cide, but the result was in fact, an unequal distribution of net improved human capital.

    You (South Americans) are still (presently) a ruling IE Population (Caste) like the IE’s in India vs the Dravidians. You are following the same course of development as they did in India. Like India, the native population is too large for you to genetically carry. Either you will politically interfere with their breeding rates, or continue to form a caste system as you do now, or separate as southern brazilians want to, or you will disappear as did the IE’s of india. There are no IE’s left in India. Only variations of the 70-30 to 30-70 mixture. in that sense, indians evolved into a separate civilization and a separate sub-race.

    You (South Americans) are still Western (Christian, Aristotelian, Rule of Law, European) due to genetic traits, institutions, and traditions, but Western Civilization includes the spectrum of peoples: south american (hispanic-amerindian-african), vs north american (european, african, hispanic, and now Asian), vs southern european (old european/balkan), vs northern european (newer european/germanic/scandinavian) , vs slavic (newest european), vs Russian/Slavic (pure european), vs FInnic (Northeastern European). And the three major christian religions, plus the secular christian religions we call variations of social democracy.

    At present, yes, south america is part of western civilization although we are seeing quite a bit of literature stating it is it’s own civilization. A trend which will continue once the current experiment with democracy has completed (ended).

    In 1000 years, will that be the case? In as little as 100? The genetic load of the native population is far too high. Just as the genetic load of the USA is now too high. and if you follow me you will recall that decline in economic and political potential is non-linear and accelerates rapidly below 97( which is 1/2 std deviation from those who can learn by reading instructions and fixing machines).

    The future of South America is that of India and its challenges, not China and its advantages.

    The choice of what happens to the european minority in the higher distributions is something you must come to terms with.

    As you know, genetic load determines nearly everything.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:09:00 UTC

  • The Only Solution Is Separation

    October 18th, 2018 9:54 AM THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION [L]eft and Right is simply the problem of reproductively desirable for the purpose of intergenerational families, businesses and polities, versus the desire for satisfaction of sexual impulses, independent of family, industry, and polity. IN other words: “The competition between european paternal, familial, commercial, and political families, and semitic maternal, individual, subsistence, anarchy. Those with agency (orderly masculine) vs those lacking it (anarchic feminine). We cannot fix this problem because under prosperity people pursue their interests. It’s in the intersets of those with lower sexual, social, economic, political, military market value – they are less domesticated OR less desirable: “politics is the entertainment business for ugly people, and media is the occupation for those who cannot produce, and the academy the occupation for those who cannot materially compete.” THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION“Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.”