[T]he Church was never in our people’s interest. Ever. It was invented like marxism to revolt against and end the rule by the aristocracy, and suppress western empiricism, philosophy and stoicism. It was imposed upon the west by the byzantines (Greeks, Anatolians, Syrians, and Jews) as a means of reversing the Roman conquest. Once rome fell the church prevented the aristocracy from recovering. During the Abrahamic Dark Age, the church merely preserved the monopoly on literacy and manufactured supernatural public ignorance as a means of creating high paying administrative jobs, from which every possible cent was extracted from the people. Once trade was restored by the Vikings (Slavid Trade), Holy Roman Empire of the Germans (north south), and the Saxons and their Hanseatic League (continental), the people were able to overcome their submission. Once literacy expanded we resisted the church and created protestantism – if for no other reason than to keep our wealth near our homes. Once commerce expanded, we revolted against the church and put the 50% of dead capital in europe back to work, generating our great leap forward, and conquest of the world. Once scientific knowledge expanded we revolted against her deceits – superstitions and lies which made possible her accumulation of capital, administrative jobs, predation upon the people. But before we could restore our religion and culture under the German’s Second Scientific Revolution, the Russians and the British allied against the Germans to prevent their expansion and caused the long European Civil War (ww1 and 2), destroying the Germanic foundations of western civilization. And this left open the window for the Socialists (french and german), the Marxists ( jewish, and russian), and the then finally the Postmodernists (french) and the feminists (Americans). Only now to we save ourselves from these barbarians and their false promises of utopia after death, or utopia after revolution and replacement of white males. No man is a hero to his debtors. We must rule. If only out of self defense. There is but one natural religion for those of us who have ancestors to whom we owe debts: Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (religion), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
The Final Word on Political Orders. Period.
[E]thnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it. Period. Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately. Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE. …fin…
-
THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutiona
THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS
Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it.
Period.
Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately.
Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE.
…fin…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 12:29:00 UTC
-
WILL YOU ACT? Europeans built the only high trust labor, working, middle, and up
WILL YOU ACT?
Europeans built the only high trust labor, working, middle, and upper middle classes in the world. The american experiment was an attempt to give the high trust classes their own government without the church or state parasites of all of history. The left’s objective has been to hollow out that high trust middle class and produce another small upper class and vast governable underclass. And it’s been working.
The only question is whether you will join with others to do something in order to change it, and reverse the conquest of the THIRD WAY.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 08:57:00 UTC
-
^ And so, what they will do, is push youth back and the old into simple jobs at
^ And so, what they will do, is push youth back and the old into simple jobs at the bottom and top, rather than bring in immigrants and destroy their social cohesion as we have here in the west. And as the labor pool continues to expand but the work Contract, they will win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 22:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058117956704653313
Reply addressees: @zimlor1 @jeffhauser
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058115003671293952
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058115003671293952
-
Western Heroism and Semitic Submission – the Masculine versus The Feminine Across 3500 Years of History
WESTERN HEROISM and SEMITIC SUBMISSION – THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS OF HISTORY (thanks to whomever asked me to comment) [I]t’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/
-
“Much of the difference between Germans and British is that the former saw the l
—“Much of the difference between Germans and British is that the former saw the latter as ‘us, over there’ whilst the later saw the former as ‘them, over here.’”—Aaron Kahland
(smart)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 15:42:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058021454640570368
-
“Much of the difference between Germans and British is that the former saw the l
—“Much of the difference between Germans and British is that the former saw the latter as ‘us, over there’ whilst the later saw the former as ‘them, over here.’”—Aaron Kahland
(smart)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 11:42:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 21:03:00 UTC
-
“Were the Sumerians White?” (no)
RACIAL CATEGORIES OF WEST EURASIANS I’ve covered this elsewhere in detail, but here, I’ll repeat: While even Aristotle used Racial Categories, (and was clearly a supremacist by every measure, and identified the same behaviors we do today due to geographic causes). It wasn’t until the western use of sail to cover the globe that we were able to observe and understand that all groups on the globe evolved on different continents and under different conditions and that all people could be categorized into three or four groups with common features and customs. (African, west asian, east asian, and the early people along the coastal route from africa to india, through the pacific into australia.) WHITE DIFFERENTIATION FROM OTHER GROUPS White (European, Western, Christendom) practices a unique combination of cultural traits, as well as two genetic traits. Cultural: (i) speaking the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, regardless of the impact on the status, dominance, and competence hierarchies that we inherited from the Yamna/Corded Ware, and Indo European Expansion (Paganism). This is in direct opposition to ‘Face’ practiced by all other cultures, and direct opposition to ‘postmodern political correctness’ and their attempt to restore the primitivism of ‘face’. (ii) the development of the corporation or commonsthat broke family barriers under bipartite manorialism, (high trust), (iii) the four principles of christianity also invented to break kinship bonds: iii.1 The eradication of hatred from the human heart. iii.2 The extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii.3 The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. iii.4 The demand for personal charity until personally certain it didnât work. Genetic: (i) greater neoteny than all but east asians but different dimorphic distribution of traits. (ii) a balance between both linguistic and spatial intelligence (iii) the additional successful reduction of the lower and underclasses and a downward expansion of the genetic middle classes, under (most recently) bipartite manorialism, but (apparently) back into prehistory as well. (iv) the additional successful reduction of the lower classes by aggressive hanging of scolds, malcontents, indolent, and criminals for over a thousand years (maybe as much as one half percent per year), (v) further culling of the impulsive during long winters, starvation, warfare, disease – despite better living standards under manorialism than the rest of the world – such that by 1200 europeans were already ahead in caloric consumption and military development than the middle east. THE MEANING OF WHITE We use white Today simply because âchristendomâ and âeuropeanâ, and âwesternâ have been intentionally undermined by the pseudoscientific postwar movement using marx(economics), boas(sociology), freud(psychology), the frankfurt school (culture), and the (literary sophism) of the french postmodernists (outright denialism), in order to prevent the continuation of the scientific revolution into the social sciences, which was started by Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Poincare, Spencer, Nietzsche, and the Romanticists . So, white refers to the set of european ethnicities (Genetic Groups) consisting of Old Europe (Greeco-Byzantine Civilization, the boot of italy, sicily, and sardinia), The Southern Europeans, The Atlantics, Germanics/scandinavians, Slavs, Finnics. They consists of those people of the western indo european expansion of the Yamna ( Pit Grave, Militaristic, Technological, Paternalistic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, that gave us the uniqueness of western civilization, in combination with horse, bronze, and wheel.). WHITE is the identity of atlantic, germanic, scandinavian, finnic, slavic peoples, and for historical reasons we include Old Europeans even though they are of anatolian extraction, not european – hence the complexion, build, and hair. These are the people of the westward expansion of the indo europeans (Yamna, corded ware cultures). (and yes, they largely replaced (exterminated) those that they conquered. However, Whites are just the westernmost branches of west eurasians that resulted from the indo european expansion. We broadly group these people into the category caucasian, which might be better said either âpeoples of the black seaâ, or âpeople of the black sea that evolved during the ice age.