Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • MEME LINGO AS AN EXPRESSION OF ASPIRATIONS TO SPECIATE English has attained, in

    MEME LINGO AS AN EXPRESSION OF ASPIRATIONS TO SPECIATE

    English has attained, in the post WWII world, the status of a lingua Franca, or trade/diplomatic language.

    There are sound economic rationale to have such a language, and historical rationale for that language to be English. Simply put, there are a host of transaction costs that can be minimized or avoided if we adopt a common language, for common purposes.

    But to those of us who speak English as a first language, there are a whole host of NEW transaction costs entailed both in being intelligible to foreigners and in foreigners being intelligible to us… Our language’s status as global lingua franca vastly aids and speeds the invasion and colonization of our lands. Our private thoughts and communications are readily understood by alien elements, at home and abroad. Our ability to discern ingroup from out is greatly degraded. Our ears are assailed by constant tirades of malicious, dishonest, out-group critique.

    For all of these reasons, and more, we are rapidly evolving our own non-mutually intelligible idioms, in the form of meme lingos filled with euphemisms, jargon, and inside jokes.

    And it’s not just us. My parents, who are still very much plugged into university-educated SWPL culture, have been adopting a progressively more idiosyncratic lexicon and usage my entire life, to the point that the way they talk, though still intelligible to me, sounds increasingly jarring and foreign (though it is no doubt soothing and familiar within their circles…)

    This process is being accelerated by, for example, internet censorship, as we are forced to innovate especially our expressions of derision faster than that can be identified, understood, and suppressed by the implaccable racial enemy.

    So my prediction is English will continue to variagate, into a standard “global” variety, and a bunch of regional and subcultural dialects, which will eventually become wholly unintelligible, separate, languages.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 14:44:00 UTC

  • ” Anglo-America is really just the final form of Viking Civ in the end, as far a

    —” Anglo-America is really just the final form of Viking Civ in the end, as far as I can tell.”—Brendan Hegarty

    (this having been said many times by many thinkers)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 10:51:00 UTC

  • Mesopotamian (Semitic) literature is underclass the same way that greek literatu

    Mesopotamian (Semitic) literature is underclass the same way that greek literature is upper class and roman literature (and english for that matter) is middle class. River lands and Forests are wonderful. Deserts suck. People are ignorant, dirty, superstitious poor, and tribal. Disease is rampant. Violence endemic. Thieving heroic. There is a vast difference between the wealthy and the poor. This is not so true in western civilization for geographic and demographic reasons. Just as it was not true in east asia. Just as it was less true in india. So while western lit is heroic (early european, aryan european, greek, roman… all of these are heroic literatures. They are not the submissive literatures of the mesopotamians and the egyptians. Whatever happens along the euphrates and the nile, we can certainly see in Gobekli Tepe and in all of the cities in the near east. Submission. This is not the literature of the hittites (anatolians), old europeans (balkans),

    There is a relationship between the russian steppe people, the mongols, and the turkic raiders, in levels of development and harshness of nature, but also an influence and more genetic similarity with the other post-ice-age peoples of europe, which were more influential via the scandinavians, pole-germans, germans, and even french.

    The church came into slavic peoples without being able to create an extractive political order as they were in europe. The bad people were the boyars, not the church. Where europeans took out their anger on the church and the aristocracy, americans did it on the aristocracy, europe in general, but were fully protestant and lacking central church political power, so without need to rebel against.

    During the period where east slavic people would have rebelled they had ‘better enemies’ to rebel against than the church. SO they did.

    Not very difficult really once you understand it but it has been very hard for me to understand it for some reason.

    So, the literature of suffering seems to be a continental thing, where the scandinavians are just pagan in spirit still. Germans are nauseating sometimes because of it. Russians nihilistic. And americans (and brits) have no cognizance of it whatsoever. Because we believe the world is under our control if we want it to be.

    So I am hostile to the submissive narratives for our people. Tragedy is a better substitute (and a western invention by the way), and tragedy calls upon us to fight together, not just suffer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:55:00 UTC

  • THE COMING CIVIL WAR ISN’T JUST ABOUT RACE by Göran Dahl The purest and most bas

    THE COMING CIVIL WAR ISN’T JUST ABOUT RACE

    by Göran Dahl

    The purest and most basal of all conflicts are those between different genetic clusters – it doesn’t get more fundamental than that. You’re not really disagreeing with Curt’s proposition that it’s a war of reproductive strategies, you’re just left hanging without a proper explanation.

    It will be a race war, but there will also be race *traitors* as you may imagine; those who aid and abet outgroups through intimate relationships and deliberate actions that are deemed detrimental to our fitness. So a lot of in-group members will be butchered because of their crimes, and at the same time, there is evidence that suggests that their propensity to commit treason is genetic.

    So saying that it’s going to be a race war is not enough; it’s also going to be an intra-racial conflict where those with weaker selection for ethnocentrism get weeded out, because they’re more likely to do something considered anti-white. We usually refer to these people as leftists. Since we and leftists pursue (on average) different evolutionary strategies, we can also state that there is going to be a conflict revolving around speciation.

    Of course, speciation is unlikely to occur because it takes hundreds of thousands of years on average (and that’s for small, isolated groups prone to genetic drift). Likewise, I think people will find it more prudent to extirpate leftists altogether to prevent them from posing a threat ever again, so instead of a speciating divergence, only a single portion of the species will survive to evolve further.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 10:50:00 UTC

  • THE CIVIL WAR OVER SPECIATION: THE ARGUMENT: Ethnocentrism is the optimum group

    THE CIVIL WAR OVER SPECIATION: THE ARGUMENT:

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, nationalism the optimum means of protecting it, nomocracy and markets in everything, the optimum means of political order to achieving it, and soft eugenics (regulating underclass rates of reproduction) a necessity of defeating regression to the mean, such that demographics correspond to states of development rather than regress the standards of living, because together they produce rates of adaptation faster than all possible alternatives.

    The mediocre seek safety in the herd and speech and defense from the pack. The exceptional seek achievement and action – and to leave its dead weight behind.

    We can afford to speciate by reproductive strategy. You and yours are welcome to speciate by your preferred means, if me and mine are by our preferred means. That is reciprocity. If we cannot agree to reciprocity, then defeat, conquest, enserfment, enslavement, and extermination are preferable to loss.

    The Herd seeks equality, proportionality, and the Pack hierarchy and reciprocity. These are genetic and therefore intuitionistic and pre-cognitive expressions of fitness for social orders.

    So we can Revolt, Separate, Prosper (or not), and Speciate or we can war. The coming civil war is not over race – it is over our new found wealth sufficient to speciate. Or in historical terms, we continue the conflict between masculine indo-european-asian and feminine anatolian-semitic-afro-asiatic.

    This means that we have the opportunity to exit the unfit from our order, and the undesirable from yours.

    Or we have the opportunity to have the bloodiest conflict in human history – and one that it is very hard to imagine the ‘right’ will not win.

    The people who talk, teach, and preach, vs the people who act, produce, and invent.

    If this isn’t acceptable to your and yours, then enemies you choose to be.

    -Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 08:25:00 UTC

  • THE JEWISH CENTURY: MARXISM-SOCIALISM, LIBERTARIANISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM,

    THE JEWISH CENTURY: MARXISM-SOCIALISM, LIBERTARIANISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM, NEO-CONSERVATISM,

    The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses)

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes)

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle)

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists)

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper)

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    COMPARE TO JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > ISLAM.

    Same Technique, Same False Promise, Same Catastrophic Consequences

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 07:54:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_867052205

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_8670522051217326080_n_10156774325692264.jpg (humor)Jon JonathanThe cucks can move south to England. They will fit in.Nov 12, 2018, 9:57 PMBill JoslinReverse and reinstate Hadrian’s wallNov 12, 2018, 10:15 PMIgor Surkanov”Sea or the middle east” is a great chant for the reconquistaNov 12, 2018, 10:56 PMJohn EdwardSea or sandNov 12, 2018, 11:27 PMIgor SurkanovJohn Edward much betterNov 12, 2018, 11:29 PMWilliam Black(humor)Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 AMVince Yoderall joking aside, there does need to be a separation of r-selected and K-selected peopleNov 13, 2018, 3:05 AMAlex MacleodI think they are water-adapted; they often have fishy names.Nov 13, 2018, 5:40 AMAlex MacleodI haven’t met all 70 million people, but I estimate that there are far more patriots in provincial England and far more cucks in rump Britannia, where most of the populace huddle in the firezone of Edinburgh and Glasgow, and are insensible to the Marxist hijack of party politics. If we see 1997 as Peak Cuck for the UK, and Scotland characteristically time-lagging, it’s tide may turn in a decade. Plus -Come on, -the whole UK is more neutered than even France.Nov 13, 2018, 6:11 AMAlex MacleodMillicent WillowsNov 13, 2018, 7:00 AM(humor)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 21:54:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_867052205

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46133182_10156774325697264_8670522051217326080_n_10156774325692264.jpg (humor)Jon JonathanThe cucks can move south to England. They will fit in.Nov 12, 2018, 9:57 PMBill JoslinReverse and reinstate Hadrian’s wallNov 12, 2018, 10:15 PMIgor Surkanov”Sea or the middle east” is a great chant for the reconquistaNov 12, 2018, 10:56 PMJohn EdwardSea or sandNov 12, 2018, 11:27 PMIgor SurkanovJohn Edward much betterNov 12, 2018, 11:29 PMWilliam Black(humor)Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 AMVince Yoderall joking aside, there does need to be a separation of r-selected and K-selected peopleNov 13, 2018, 3:05 AMGreg StrangAs a Scot I have to disagree however we have what I would call a unique and challenging opportunity here.

    Much of our underclasses are already heavily entrenched in “council estate” or similar ghetto areas, mostly across the central belt between & including Fife and Glasgow. Essentially the culture in these places is ready for a commune style r-selective society.

    The hardest part of the speciation question IMO is not what a potential “we” do with a potential “them” after achieving whatever theoretical objectives prior, I actually think the herd should more or less be left to self organize as it will be ever changing in organization.

    The question for me and the opportunity I see is in HOW we must organize and execute plans alongside others to create an independent frame or set of institutions / power structures / commons within the state of Scotland(UK) to allow a new class-like speciation based on the let us say lifestyle differences desired. The Highlands have many close knit communities and odd rural infrastructure with large amounts of undeveloped land particularly in mountainous zones. I also think there is a polarization within rural Scottish areas that one might find surprisingly open to a preceding ideological conversion campaign.

    A combination of feudal rural politics and production combined with a propertarianism based central market economy run from a large mega-city could form the basis of the new infrastructure and the architectural form would be as important as the functional, this new Home serving as a beacon for the perrenniallists seeking a new order. Of course, building such a wonder seems insane, but is it not a fitting Home for the k-selected superhuman of the future?

    Call me a dreamer but I felt like posting this stream of thought here this morning in case I hit on anything pertinent ;)Nov 13, 2018, 4:02 AMAlex MacleodI think they are water-adapted; they often have fishy names.Nov 13, 2018, 5:40 AMAlex MacleodI haven’t met all 70 million people, but I estimate that there are far more patriots in provincial England and far more cucks in rump Britannia, where most of the populace huddle in the firezone of Edinburgh and Glasgow, and are insensible to the Marxist hijack of party politics. If we see 1997 as Peak Cuck for the UK, and Scotland characteristically time-lagging, it’s tide may turn in a decade. Plus -Come on, -the whole UK is more neutered than even France.Nov 13, 2018, 6:11 AMAlex MacleodMillicent WillowsNov 13, 2018, 7:00 AM(humor)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 21:54:00 UTC

  • Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is t

    Ergo the issue is not empire nor monarchy, but ETHNICITY. ie: ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, and trading ethnocentricity for rents at the cost of multicultural conflict is a short term win at long term cost.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 16:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061655670561431552

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061650366213701632

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061650366213701632

  • WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME? by Eli Harman If “negligent homicide” is a

    WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME?

    by Eli Harman

    If “negligent homicide” is a thing? Why not “negligent genocide?”

    It’s possible that some misguided fools genuinely believe that a world teeming with “crossbreeds” with no identity and no culture is a good and beautiful thing. I never thought of it that way.

    I always appreciate the historical accomplishments of Western, meaning white, civilization and mourned their possibly inevitable future loss. I say “possibly inevitable” because when I gave my loyalty to individualist principles, similar to Jordan Peterson’s, I didn’t see any way to prevent it. Nothing to do but make that leap and hope for the best.

    But we have all the evidence we need now to banish hope. Not one great, city, nation, or civilization has been improved by the inclusion of dependent, third world, hordes. And everywhere the process has gotten suitably advanced is a total disaster.

    London used to be capital of a great empire. Now it’s the capital of acid attacks. Detroit used to be an unmatched industrial center. Now it’s rotting back into the weeds.

    Multiculturalism doesn’t lead to “Star Trek.” It leads to Brazil or South Africa. But it turns out that preventing that is a simple matter of abandoning unworkable and undesirable individualist principles. If any fools still don’t understand, it’s because they are willfully ignorant. That is not a valid excuse any longer. All the evidence one needs is readily available.

    But some of our would-be genociders are not ignorant, misguided, nor foolish.

    They are deadly serious.

    For them, “Star Trek” was never the point.

    Only the destruction of Western Civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 12:55:00 UTC