Look. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to prosecute pseudoscience. Race denialism, is pseudoscience just, just as much as marxist economics is pseudoscience, as much as theology is pseudoscience, and just as much as postmodernism is a combination of sophism, pseudoscience, and outright denial . The importance of race may be relative but the existence of races is an observable fact which is fairly obvious from the vast differences in our skulls that equal to the differences in the identification of everything from beetles to mammals. Ergo if you say certain species and subspecies should be protected and do not say that the same applies to humans then you are simply engaging in fraud and deceit. Here is a link to the full extent of known peoples, which I update to reflect each major revision in the DNA research once or twice a year. I have not updated it for 2018 findings yet.
Below is the Primate taxonomy. Taxonomy is determined by morphology (gene expression) assisting in the identification of kin groups (kin selection). In other words, morphology assists in the identification of kin, and because of kin better ability to judge the fitness of those mates. (Conversely, crossing kingroup boundaries provides the genetically UNFIT with opportunity that is not available within group. As such superior groups should logically seek to exit non-conforming members, not retain them.) The difference between races are observable at the morphological, behavioral, aggregate behavioral, and genetic levels, but largely minor other than the fact that the size of the underclass genetic classes versus the middle genetic classes is asymmetric favoring survival under glaciation, as well as survival of winter farming, which led to greater neoteny (‘domestication’) in the far east and far west and less so in the more equatorial regions. When we notice differences between the races we are largely noticing (and reacting to) greater and lesser degrees of neotonic evolution, and when we stereotype races we are largely noticing and reacting to the sizes of the underclasses in relation tot he middle and upper. And when we measure the economic, political, social, and intellectual status of civilizations, races, and subraces, we are largely measuring the inability of groups to cull the size of the underclass sufficiently to produce a Pareto distribution capable of economic, political, social, and military competition with neighboring groups. This is the science. And any contrary argument is false, lie, and fraud. Sorry. Order:Primates Suborder:Haplorhini Infraorder:Simiiformes Family:Hominidae Subfamily:Homininae Tribe: Hominini … Genus: Pan … … Species … … … Pan Troglodytes ( Common Chimpanzee) … … … Subspecies: … … … … 1. Pan troglodytes verus … … … … 2. P. t. ellioti … … … … 3. P. t. troglodytes … … … … 4. P. t. schweinfurthii … … Species … … … Pan Paniscus (Bonobo) … Genus:Homo … … Species: … … … H. sapiens (anatomically modern humans) … … … Subspecies: … … … … H. S. Sapiens … … … … … Races: … … … … … … H. S. Africanus … … … … … … H. S. Mongoloid … … … … … … H. S. Caucasoid The question is only whether we are different races, subspecies, or species, since the definition of subspecies on down is determined by adaptation to geographic conditions and tendency for ingroup selection. Since humans are happy to attempt to ‘breed with’ (euphemistically) just about anything from dogs, to sheep to donkeys, the we have only marriage selection as an equivalent test of ingroup identification among human races. Cheers