(FB 1551979797 Timestamp) One you realize how much they are behind it all, you will become … extremely angry. It’s almost unimaginable that people can be that good at deceit that they can fool the vast majority of a civilization – until you realize they did it before with christianity and they almost did it with marxism, and now they’re doing it with genocide by postmodernism.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551988756 Timestamp) “THE GOYIM KNOW” Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. It’s not just usury. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard. Instead, it’s every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and crique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional. It ends now. De-financialization, De-politicization, De-distinformationalization, and restoration of our eugenic group evolutionary strategy in our own self interest. It’s easy. The law. The most intolerant law ever made. With the law we make the extirpation of parasites a for-profit business for every citizen of character Propertarianism.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551984149 Timestamp) LIES AND DEFEATING THEM – THE RED QUEEN OF EUROPEAN VS SEMITIC CIVS —“They are incredibly good at deceit. Very good. However, we’re very good at identifying it”—CD —“The Red Queen.”—Martin Å tÄpán
-
(FB 1552161245 Timestamp) THE IE GROUPS Altaic – ~Extinct in the east, outbred i
(FB 1552161245 Timestamp) THE IE GROUPS Altaic – ~Extinct in the east, outbred in Anatolia. Tocharian (Extinct) – By the Chinese Anatolian (Extinct) – By the Semitic Peoples Indo Aryan ~Extinct Through Outbreeding. Iranic – Converted to Islam by the Muslim Invasion. European – We will see if we survive or if we will do as the east asians and build a wall.
-
(FB 1552160830 Timestamp) Tocharian (Exterminated by Chinese Expansion) The Toch
(FB 1552160830 Timestamp) Tocharian (Exterminated by Chinese Expansion) The Tocharians or Tokharians (/tÉËkÉÉriÉnz/ or /tÉËkÉËriÉnz/) were Indo-European peoples who inhabited the medieval oasis city-states on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (modern Xinjiang, China) in ancient times. The Tocharian languages, a branch of the Indo-European family, are known from manuscripts from the 6th to 8th centuries AD. The name “Tocharian” was given to them by modern scholars, who identified their speakers with a people who inhabited Bactria from the 2nd century BC, and were known in ancient Greek sources as the Tókharoi (Latin Tochari). This identification is generally considered erroneous, but the name “Tocharian” remains the most common term for the languages and their speakers. Agricultural communities first appeared in the oases of the northern Tarim circa 2000 BC. (The earliest Tarim mummies, which may not be connected to the Tocharians, date from c. 1800 BC.) Some scholars have linked these communities to the Afanasievo culture found earlier (c. 3500â2500 BC) in Siberia, north of the Tarim or Central Asian BMAC culture. By the 2nd century BC, these settlements had developed into city states, overshadowed by nomadic peoples to the north and Chinese empires to the east. These cities, the largest of which was Kucha, also served as way stations on the branch of the Silk Road that ran along the northern edge of the Taklamakan desert. From the 8th century AD, the Uyghurs â speakers of a Turkic language from the Kingdom of Qocho â settled in the region. The peoples of the Tarim city states intermixed with the Uyghurs, whose Old Uyghur language spread through the region. The Tocharian languages are believed to have become extinct during the 9th century. Tocharian also spelled Tokharian (/tÉËkÉÉriÉn/ or /tÉËkÉËriÉn/), is an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family. It is known from manuscripts dating from the 6th to the 8th century AD, which were found in oasis cities on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (now part of Xinjiang in northwest China). The discovery of these languages in the early 20th century contradicted the formerly prevalent idea of an eastâwest division of the Indo-European language family on the centumâsatem isogloss, and prompted reinvigorated study of the family. Identifying the authors with the Tokharoi people of ancient Bactria (Tokharistan), early authors called these languages “Tocharian”. Although this identification is now generally considered mistaken, the name has remained. The documents record two closely related languages, called Tocharian A (“East Tocharian”, Agnean or Turfanian) and Tocharian B (“West Tocharian” or Kuchean). The subject matter of the texts suggests that Tocharian A was more archaic and used as a Buddhist liturgical language, while Tocharian B was more actively spoken in the entire area from Turfan in the east to Tumshuq in the west. A body of loanwords and names found in Prakrit documents have been dubbed Tocharian C (Kroränian).
-
(FB 1552160069 Timestamp) Iranic The Iranian or Iranic languages[2][3] are a bra
(FB 1552160069 Timestamp) Iranic The Iranian or Iranic languages[2][3] are a branch of the Indo-Iranian languages in the Indo-European language family that are spoken natively by the Iranian peoples. The Iranian languages are grouped in three stages: Old Iranian (until 400 BC), Middle Iranian (400 BC â 900 AD), and New Iranian (since 900 AD). The two directly attested Old Iranian languages are Old Persian (from the Achaemenid Empire) and Old Avestan (the language of the Avesta). Of the Middle Iranian languages, the better understood and recorded ones are Middle Persian (from the Sasanian Empire), Parthian (from the Parthian Empire), and Bactrian (from the Kushan and Hephthalite empires). As of 2008, there were an estimated 150â200 million native speakers of the Iranian languages.[4] Ethnologue estimates that there are 86 Iranian languages,[5][6] the largest among them being Persian, Pashto, and the Kurdish dialect continuum.[7] The term Iranian is applied to any language which descends from the ancestral Proto-Iranian language.[8] This use of the term for the Iranian language family was introduced in 1836 by Christian Lassen.[9] Robert Needham Cust used the term Irano-Aryan in 1878,[10] and Orientalists such as George Abraham Grierson and Max Müller contrasted Irano-Aryan (Iranian) and Indo-Aryan (Indic). Some recent scholarship, primarily in German, has revived this convention.[11][12][13][14] The Iranian languages are divided into the following branches: The Western Iranian languages subdivided into: Southwestern, of which Persian is the dominant member; Northwestern, of which the Kurdish languages are the dominant members. The Eastern Iranian languages subdivided into: Southeastern, of which Pashto is the dominant member; Northeastern, by far the smallest branch, of which Ossetian is the dominant member. Proto-Iranian Historical distribution in 100 BC: shown are Sarmatia, Scythia, Bactria (Eastern Iranian, in orange); and the Parthian Empire (Western Iranian, in red) The Iranian languages all descend from a common ancestor: the so-called Proto-Iranian which itself evolved from Proto-Indo-Iranian. This ancestor language is speculated to have origins in Central Asia, and the Andronovo Culture is suggested as a candidate for the common Indo-Iranian culture around 2000 BC. It was situated precisely in the western part of Central Asia that borders present-day Russia (and present-day Kazakhstan). It was in relative proximity to the other satem ethno-linguistic groups of the Indo-European family, like Thracian, Balto-Slavic and others, and to common Indo-European’s original homeland (more precisely, the steppes of southern Russia to the north of the Caucasus), according to the reconstructed linguistic relationships of common Indo-European. Proto-Iranian thus dates to some time after Proto-Indo-Iranian break-up, or the early second millennium BCE, as the Old Iranian languages began to break off and evolve separately as the various Iranian tribes migrated and settled in vast areas of southeastern Europe, the Iranian plateau, and Central Asia. Proto-Iranian innovations compared to Proto-Indo-Iranian include:[15] the turning of sibilant fricative *s into non-sibilant fricative glottal *h; the voiced aspirated plosives *bʰ, *dʰ, *gʰ yielding to the voiced unaspirated plosives *b, *d, *g resp.; the voiceless unaspirated stops *p, *t, *k before another consonant changing into fricatives *f, *θ, *x resp.; voiceless aspirated stops *pʰ, *tʰ, *kʰ turning into fricatives *f, *θ, *x, resp.
-
(FB 1552159139 Timestamp) Altaic languages Altaic is a hypothetical language fam
(FB 1552159139 Timestamp) Altaic languages Altaic is a hypothetical language family of central Eurasia and Siberia first proposed in the 18th century, but whose existence is widely discredited among comparative linguists. The Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic groups are invariably included in the family; some authors added Koreanic and the Japonic languages. The latter expanded grouping came to be known as “Macro-Altaic”, leading to the designation of the smaller former grouping as “Micro-Altaic” by retronymy. Most proponents of Altaic continue to support the inclusion of Korean. These languages are spoken in a wide arc stretching from Eastern Europe through Anatolia and eastern Caucasus through North Asia and Central Asia to the Korean Peninsula and Japanese archipelago in East Asia. The group is named after the Altai mountain range in the center of Asia.
-
(FB 1552158788 Timestamp) ANOTHER TAKE ON THE IE EXPANSION Stage 1: “ORIGINATION
(FB 1552158788 Timestamp) ANOTHER TAKE ON THE IE EXPANSION Stage 1: “ORIGINATION” Some pre-IE languages are also indicated:
- Vasconic is tentatively associated here with Neolithic languages of Thessalian origin (my main working hypothesis). It would at the time be the largest European language family therefore.
- Uralic should be right north of the early Indoeuropeans, what explains their ancestral Sprachbund.
Pelasgian indicates the language of Vinca-Dimini (Grey Ware), which was a limited intrusion c. 5000 BCE with origins related to Tell Halaf most likely.
Stage 2: “EXPANSION” The main outline of the Indo-european expansion. Some other cultures and languages are indicated in gray colors for context. At this point we should have the seeds of: – Anatolian (Maykop) – Tocharian (Afanasevo, in Altai) – Indo-Iranian (Yamna) – Western Indo-european (Baalberge): a large subfamily that would give birth to Balto-Slavic, Germanic, Celtic and Italic. – Possible seeds of Tracian, Greek, etc. in the Balcanic Kurgans, an ill-defined group that would nevertheless plunder and radically alter the ethnic geography of the Eastern Balcans (see next map). Stage 3: “CONSOLIDATION” Some notes:
- The Anatolian branch goes into Asia with the Kura-Araxes culture.
The Eastern Balcans are divided between two cultures:
- Cotofeni, more purely Kurgan and a candidate for Greek origins
-
- Ezero, rather Dniepr-Don (â Sredny-Stog II) cultural inheritance. Surely proto-Thracians and hence a candidate for the origin of Armenian (via Phrygians).
Expansion of Yamna (proto-Indo-Iranians) and therefore liquidation of Dniepr-Don Neolithic
Consolidation and first expansion of the Western IE branch (Globular Amphorae). It may be important to note that in the BaalbergeâââGlobular Amphorae period, this Kurgan culture experimented various influences that may be considered Vasconic: the Danubian substrate, the powerful southern Danubian culture of Baden and the Northernly Funnelbeaker influence, associated to Atlantic Megalithism.
Stage 4: “COMPLETION” Setting the proto-historical scenario with some further expansions. Most notably:
- Corded Ware: a major expansion of the Western IE group to the West, East and North.
Vucedol: probably associated with the previous, eradicates the Danubian culture in their homeland (only Foltesti in Moldavia would survive for some more time within this important Neolithic macro-culture). Vucedol would be another candidate for Greek origins for their use of the architectural concept of megaron.
Catacombs culture’s origins are debated but it’s clearly Kurgan in any case.
Poltavka represents continuity with the seed of the Kurgan/Indoeuropean phenomenon and its later evolution leads directly to Indo-Iranians.
It should be noted that, synchronously with the Corded Ware expansion, the Megalithic bowmen of Artenac culture expanded from Dordogne, subsuming the last Western Danubian groups all the way to Belgium. This culture was probably proto-Aquitanian. A whole millennium of stability followed at the new Rhine border, crossed only by the likely traders of the Bell Beaker phenomenon. Source: http://forwhattheywereweare.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
- Vasconic is tentatively associated here with Neolithic languages of Thessalian origin (my main working hypothesis). It would at the time be the largest European language family therefore.
-
(FB 1552161245 Timestamp) THE IE GROUPS Altaic – ~Extinct in the east, outbred i
(FB 1552161245 Timestamp) THE IE GROUPS Altaic – ~Extinct in the east, outbred in Anatolia. Tocharian (Extinct) – By the Chinese Anatolian (Extinct) – By the Semitic Peoples Indo Aryan ~Extinct Through Outbreeding. Iranic – Converted to Islam by the Muslim Invasion. European – We will see if we survive or if we will do as the east asians and build a wall.
-
(FB 1552160830 Timestamp) Tocharian (Exterminated by Chinese Expansion) The Toch
(FB 1552160830 Timestamp) Tocharian (Exterminated by Chinese Expansion) The Tocharians or Tokharians (/tÉËkÉÉriÉnz/ or /tÉËkÉËriÉnz/) were Indo-European peoples who inhabited the medieval oasis city-states on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (modern Xinjiang, China) in ancient times. The Tocharian languages, a branch of the Indo-European family, are known from manuscripts from the 6th to 8th centuries AD. The name “Tocharian” was given to them by modern scholars, who identified their speakers with a people who inhabited Bactria from the 2nd century BC, and were known in ancient Greek sources as the Tókharoi (Latin Tochari). This identification is generally considered erroneous, but the name “Tocharian” remains the most common term for the languages and their speakers. Agricultural communities first appeared in the oases of the northern Tarim circa 2000 BC. (The earliest Tarim mummies, which may not be connected to the Tocharians, date from c. 1800 BC.) Some scholars have linked these communities to the Afanasievo culture found earlier (c. 3500â2500 BC) in Siberia, north of the Tarim or Central Asian BMAC culture. By the 2nd century BC, these settlements had developed into city states, overshadowed by nomadic peoples to the north and Chinese empires to the east. These cities, the largest of which was Kucha, also served as way stations on the branch of the Silk Road that ran along the northern edge of the Taklamakan desert. From the 8th century AD, the Uyghurs â speakers of a Turkic language from the Kingdom of Qocho â settled in the region. The peoples of the Tarim city states intermixed with the Uyghurs, whose Old Uyghur language spread through the region. The Tocharian languages are believed to have become extinct during the 9th century. Tocharian also spelled Tokharian (/tÉËkÉÉriÉn/ or /tÉËkÉËriÉn/), is an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family. It is known from manuscripts dating from the 6th to the 8th century AD, which were found in oasis cities on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (now part of Xinjiang in northwest China). The discovery of these languages in the early 20th century contradicted the formerly prevalent idea of an eastâwest division of the Indo-European language family on the centumâsatem isogloss, and prompted reinvigorated study of the family. Identifying the authors with the Tokharoi people of ancient Bactria (Tokharistan), early authors called these languages “Tocharian”. Although this identification is now generally considered mistaken, the name has remained. The documents record two closely related languages, called Tocharian A (“East Tocharian”, Agnean or Turfanian) and Tocharian B (“West Tocharian” or Kuchean). The subject matter of the texts suggests that Tocharian A was more archaic and used as a Buddhist liturgical language, while Tocharian B was more actively spoken in the entire area from Turfan in the east to Tumshuq in the west. A body of loanwords and names found in Prakrit documents have been dubbed Tocharian C (Kroränian).