(FB 1546102000 Timestamp) Humor: when the neanderthal data first came out, I received quite a few insults in pseudo-argumentative form from east asians about western man’s neanderthal content – only to lately discover it’s east asians with the greater presence of neanderthal genes. Ergo. Be careful what you say when the data first comes out.
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546102000 Timestamp) Humor: when the neanderthal data first came out, I received quite a few insults in pseudo-argumentative form from east asians about western man’s neanderthal content – only to lately discover it’s east asians with the greater presence of neanderthal genes. Ergo. Be careful what you say when the data first comes out.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546118155 Timestamp) I might err, but as I understand it, at about six generations all individuality is lost, and we are identifiable as members of an ancestral pool only. And that ancestral pool is determined by the present location of ancestral pools.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546118155 Timestamp) I might err, but as I understand it, at about six generations all individuality is lost, and we are identifiable as members of an ancestral pool only. And that ancestral pool is determined by the present location of ancestral pools.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546103947 Timestamp) On suspicion, I’ve been watching videos of people surprised by their DNA results. And it’s really obvious they’re trying to spread multiculturalism rather than the history of defeat conquest and extermination evident in peoples genetics. If you understand the basic races and how they evolved and that all the data says is who you share genes with today, then you can grasp that if you’re south american you will have some north african, some iberian, and some european. And if you have slavery you will have either a touch of northeastern or a touch of central african. You will also learn that ONE DROP is a curse that stays with you and your line for freaking ever. If you are northern european you will be some mixture of atlantic-celtic, nordic, germanic, slavic. If you have mediterranean your origins are anatolian and greek, with old levantine and north african. If you are north african (berber etc) you are related to west eurasians. if you are arab you come from the border of somalia/ethiopia and the arab peninsula, and the later ‘marsh arabs’ of the north. If you are persian you are from central branch of west eurasians. if you are turkic you are from the eastern branch of the west eurasians. If you are from old europe (balkans) your admixture can be either very very old european (extinct), greek, slavic, turkic, and some middle eastern. Just because you share a few genes with the Ashkenazi does not mean you have any jewish ancestors, only that jews had common ancestors with yours. Just because you have italian markers does not mean you are italian because the north of italy is german, the south greek, and the Itals and Etru that preceded them are extinct other than fragments, and only germanic and greek remaining any dominance. The UK is a celtic and nordic country with a history of german rulers, and french language. The UK was the most thoroughly decimated (replaced, genocided) early european population by the IE expansion. France is a genetically split country between southern europeans (S/SW), celts(nw) and germans (E/SE), which is why it shows up as ‘general european’. If your genome says you have thai-southeast asian that just means that your native american ancestry with genes shared by people in east and southeast asia. Think about where people lived during the glacial period and that is where today’s races come from. The movement of people has not been that significant. aside from the genocides against the americans the north africans, and the levantines, and the balkans, we tend to retain our neolithic identities. What has happened is that large empires have exterminated subraces. In other words, genocide is the most influential action in history. And that’s not a very nice thing to understand.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546103947 Timestamp) On suspicion, I’ve been watching videos of people surprised by their DNA results. And it’s really obvious they’re trying to spread multiculturalism rather than the history of defeat conquest and extermination evident in peoples genetics. If you understand the basic races and how they evolved and that all the data says is who you share genes with today, then you can grasp that if you’re south american you will have some north african, some iberian, and some european. And if you have slavery you will have either a touch of northeastern or a touch of central african. You will also learn that ONE DROP is a curse that stays with you and your line for freaking ever. If you are northern european you will be some mixture of atlantic-celtic, nordic, germanic, slavic. If you have mediterranean your origins are anatolian and greek, with old levantine and north african. If you are north african (berber etc) you are related to west eurasians. if you are arab you come from the border of somalia/ethiopia and the arab peninsula, and the later ‘marsh arabs’ of the north. If you are persian you are from central branch of west eurasians. if you are turkic you are from the eastern branch of the west eurasians. If you are from old europe (balkans) your admixture can be either very very old european (extinct), greek, slavic, turkic, and some middle eastern. Just because you share a few genes with the Ashkenazi does not mean you have any jewish ancestors, only that jews had common ancestors with yours. Just because you have italian markers does not mean you are italian because the north of italy is german, the south greek, and the Itals and Etru that preceded them are extinct other than fragments, and only germanic and greek remaining any dominance. The UK is a celtic and nordic country with a history of german rulers, and french language. The UK was the most thoroughly decimated (replaced, genocided) early european population by the IE expansion. France is a genetically split country between southern europeans (S/SW), celts(nw) and germans (E/SE), which is why it shows up as ‘general european’. If your genome says you have thai-southeast asian that just means that your native american ancestry with genes shared by people in east and southeast asia. Think about where people lived during the glacial period and that is where today’s races come from. The movement of people has not been that significant. aside from the genocides against the americans the north africans, and the levantines, and the balkans, we tend to retain our neolithic identities. What has happened is that large empires have exterminated subraces. In other words, genocide is the most influential action in history. And that’s not a very nice thing to understand.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546648447 Timestamp) REGARDING TALEB’S IDENTITY CRISIS Druz, Jew, Syrian, Jordanian, Palestinian, … they’re ALMOST as close to each other as northern europeans are to each other. Look: … NORTH … South Caucasus, Anatolian, Iranian (North West Asians) … <-overlap with-> … CENTER … Mesopotamians, Levantines (South west eurasians) … <-overlap with-> … SOUTH … North Semites, South Semites ( middle easterns: … horn of africa, yemen, red sea, arabian peninsula) Ashkenazi went thru a bottleneck after selecting for literacy, and they seem to have saved their rabbis first, every time they were punished for usury and conspiracy with the state against the people, and they consistently pushed reproduction up thru the rabbis – and that’s all it took. Adaptation may be slow but expression of bottlenecks (eugenics) is not. Six generations and miracles can happen.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546648447 Timestamp) REGARDING TALEB’S IDENTITY CRISIS Druz, Jew, Syrian, Jordanian, Palestinian, … they’re ALMOST as close to each other as northern europeans are to each other. Look: … NORTH … South Caucasus, Anatolian, Iranian (North West Asians) … <-overlap with-> … CENTER … Mesopotamians, Levantines (South west eurasians) … <-overlap with-> … SOUTH … North Semites, South Semites ( middle easterns: … horn of africa, yemen, red sea, arabian peninsula) Ashkenazi went thru a bottleneck after selecting for literacy, and they seem to have saved their rabbis first, every time they were punished for usury and conspiracy with the state against the people, and they consistently pushed reproduction up thru the rabbis – and that’s all it took. Adaptation may be slow but expression of bottlenecks (eugenics) is not. Six generations and miracles can happen.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1546803700 Timestamp) STEREOTYPES ARE THE MOST ACCURATE MEASURE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE via Brandon Hayes, via Rosenborg Predmetsky
(worth repeating) (just like IQ the most accurate measure in psychology). from: http://www.spsp.org/news-center/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response/ THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE This blog is not the place to review the overwhelming evidence of stereotype accuracy, though interested readers are directed to SPSR and our updated reviews that have appeared in Current Directions in Psychological Science (Jussim et al, 2015) and Todd Nelsonâs Handbook of Stereotypes, Prejudice and Discrimination (Jussim et al, 2016). Summarizing those reviews: Over 50 studies have now been performed assessing the accuracy of demographic, national, political, and other stereotypes. Stereotype accuracy is one of the largest and most replicable effects in all of social psychology. Richard et al (2003) found that fewer than 5% of all effects in social psychology exceeded râs of .50. In contrast, nearly all consensual stereotype accuracy correlations and about half of all personal stereotype accuracy correlations exceed .50.[1] The evidence from both experimental and naturalistic studies indicates that people apply their stereotypes when judging others approximately rationally. When individuating information is absent or ambiguous, stereotypes often influence person perception. When individuating information is clear and relevant, its effects are âmassiveâ (Kunda & Thagard, 1996, yes, that is a direct quote, p. 292), and stereotype effects tend to be weak or nonexistent. This puts the lie to longstanding claims that âstereotypes lead people to ignore individual differences.â There are only a handful of studies that have examined whether the situations in which people rely on stereotypes when judging individuals increases or reduces person perception accuracy. Although those studies typically show that doing so increases person perception accuracy, there are too few to reach any general conclusion. Nonetheless, that body of research provides no support whatsoever for the common presumption that the ways and conditions under which people rely on stereotypes routinely reduces person perception accuracy. -
(FB 1546790065 Timestamp) DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN ITALIAN IQ —
(FB 1546790065 Timestamp) DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN ITALIAN IQ —“30% southern admixture in Piemonte lowered the IQ by 2.2 points. Thus the genotypic difference between Northern and Southern Italy is 2.2/0.3= 7.33 IQ points.”— A lot of this was literacy. This is the reason for china vs india. Literacy = programming. ITALY VS INDIA (SIMILAR STORIES) Truthful testimony, literacy, hard science, and hard social science (tort law) eliminate error.