Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • INTELLIGENCE, FLYNN, CLASS, ETHNICITY, REGRESSION I don’t make mistakes. It’s my

    INTELLIGENCE, FLYNN, CLASS, ETHNICITY, REGRESSION

    I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job. I have to compensate for you folks. 😉

    Neural Plasticity refers to change – usually through generalization, and adaptation of a region to compensate for loss of another region – not to raw ability. If you sacrifice neurons in some area to gain them in another you gained at a cost.

    Intelligence scales ALL abilities up and down with limited differences in the ‘objects and abstractions’ that we specialize in – largely male or female, and the degree of agency we train for (daydreaming vs calculating). And “g” changes by only on point or so every three to six years if you work very hard at it constantly. The reason being that many many factors developmental, molecular, biological, and physical affect the outcome.

    The Flynn effect (an average) was caused by two factors: a) the culling of the bottom extremes (natal care), and b) general adoption of scientific knowledge. For example, eye response tests (another intelligence test) have DECLINED over the same period.

    We did not make people smarter biologically, we removed impediments to their demonstrated intelligence by removing ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, and falsehood.

    So, it is not ‘magical’ but statistical. In general, scientific knowledge improves learning and reasoning rapidly (just as supernatural nonsense makes you dumber). We can’t test unscientific learning (pattern matching) when the structure of unscientific information is not coherent or commensurable. Scientific knowledge (general rules) are coherent and commensurable – which is how we know they are ‘true’.

    It takes only 6-7 generations to domesticate an animal. Major transformations of a genome GOOD AND BAD can occur in just four to eight generations. Group selection (class rates of reproduction) can work in just two or three generations, and certainly in four.

    British IQ was in the 112-115 range by the industrial revolution (From Lynn). Since the industrial revolution reproductive asymmetry has reversed over a thousand years of systemic eugenics.

    The same is occurring in china. Within one generation or so the Chinese advantage of 105 (even among rurals) will reduce to 100 thru asymmetric reproduction.

    Islam has been asymmetrically reproductive for far longer than anywhere other than Africa and india. In india they compensated with castes so that they have a two tiered society (the two extremes of “Jews and Gypsies”). The islamic world has been affected deeply by african, slave, inbreeding, and destruction of the old upper classes, and the limited rates of reproduction of the upper. This is one of the reasons for Lebanese success in the region – it had sufficient population that was either christian or jewish both of whom produced the opposite behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:12:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424637058664968

  • (…continued) The debates that are open as far as I know, are: (a) whether anat

    (…continued)

    The debates that are open as far as I know, are:

    (a) whether anatolians came counter-clockwise around the black sea, or clockwise. I have assumed that it’s counter-clockwise until evidence otherwise – the reason being their arts.

    (b) And whether the Iranic people went south of the caspian sea, or north into central Asia and then down and back eastward into today’s Iranic lands.

    (c) I don’t think anyone disputes that the turkic people were far eastern edge, and moved southwest under pressure from the east asians. (I generally ignore the central asians because they have’t produced a ‘civilization’ per se.)

    (d) Whether the Mesopotamians, and whether they are indigenous “marsh arabs”, or a mixture of everyone in the region. It sure looks like they are north semites (marsh arabs). And it sure looks like the south west eurasians and northeast africans merged in what is today’s somalia-yemen-red sea -persian gulf basins, and split between river(north semitic) and sea (south semitic) groups.

    (d) whether anatolians or caucasians or arabs (afro-asiatics) occupied the eastern mediterranean but that over time we’ve seen admixture between groups.

    (e) whether the berber (north african) peoples emerged from the north of africa (top of the red sea, egypt, or the east (horn) of africa. I operate under the assumption that they migrated north and the were relatively insulated (they were on and off insulated).

    (f) the timing and mode of the competition between modern east asians, central eurasians, and the same for modern east asians (mongolids) and their fork from broader souther-route negroids (austronesians).

    There are others but they don’t affect my pursuit f the problem of truth and institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:10:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424630975094590

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy. In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism. I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology. So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting. Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.) The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india). Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

  • CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed cri

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS

    I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy.

    In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of
    (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism.

    I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology.

    So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting.

    Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.)

    The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india).

    Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract.

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:09:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

  • EXERPT FROM GUILLAUME FAY’S ETHNIC APOCALYPSE (Arkatos 2019) The whole book foll

    EXERPT FROM GUILLAUME FAY’S ETHNIC APOCALYPSE (Arkatos 2019)

    The whole book follows this ‘tone’….

    It is anti-Abrahamic (christian, jewish, islamist) all the way thru, and no mercy is shown to any….

    ——–

    Weakness, Cowardice, Denial and Gullibility —
    The Four Pillars of Our Disappearance

    In December 2016, the Berlin Christmas market — a
    strong Christian symbol in its own right — was targeted
    by a jihadist who, similarly to what we witnessed in Nice
    in July 2014, used a truck to ram into people. The death
    toll totalled twelve infidels ofiered to allah-the-most-
    merciful as a sacrifice. In his anti-racist desire to avoid
    potential ‘amalgamations’ and the ‘stigmatisation’ of
    Muslims, a certain Green MP (an Islamophilic leftist,
    which constitutes an almost pleonasmic combination of
    words) refused to allow the assassin’s wanted notice to
    be published. One is thus plunged into the very depths of
    collaboration and complicity with those criminal
    invaders.

    Angela Merkel, who, as part of a theatrical and fake
    sort of humanitarianism, has organised the Syrian
    migrant invasion, is also objectively co-responsible for
    the situation. Although the migrants are mostly
    Muslims, their exclusively Syrian origin has yet to be
    proven.

    As for Ivan Rioufol, he believes that, through its elites,
    Europe is digging its own grave. Here is what he wrote in
    Le Figaro: ‘German society is devastated by its own self-
    blame. Thus do emasculated civilisations perish’. The
    greatest fear of Western European leaders, of those…

    (Etc…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:01:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424593455170557

  • THE CONDITIONS FOR A POSSIBLE VICTORY from Guillaume Faye’s Ethnic Apocalypse. E

    THE CONDITIONS FOR A POSSIBLE VICTORY
    from Guillaume Faye’s Ethnic Apocalypse.

    Everything will depend on the shock caused by ethnic
    uprising and on the destruction and disorganisation that
    it will generate. If the shock is strong and traumatic
    enough and can reverse mentalities, a victory is possible;
    but obviously only at the price of a choice between the
    logic of war and the dogmatism of human rights, which
    are completely incompatible with one another. The
    essential criterion for a mental change on the part of the
    French people, be it our authorities or ordinary citizens,
    would be their readiness to shed blood. As for our police
    forces, they would have to acknowledge the fact that it is no longer a question of ‘policing’, as was the case in May
    1968, but of a civil war, which is not quite the same
    thing.

    To paraphrase Clausewitz, I would say that ‘what
    characterises war is one’s acceptance to receive death
    but also give it, without being confused with a murderer’.
    Who knows if, following our potential victory in this
    racial civil war, any and all immigrational invasions will
    not be rendered impossible (and even unthinkable in the
    eyes of those who would launch them), with de-
    migration a self-evident fact one shamelessly and
    assertively demands? For nowhere is the future written.
    There are many who lament, saying that ‘the damage is
    done, it is too late’. When one considers the horrid
    migrational invasion; the (mostly African) demographic
    explosion, which has gone hand in hand with rampant
    Islamisation; the emasculation of our ageing French
    population; the brain drain of our young people (as the
    ‘bac -6’ replaces the ‘bac +6’);sre and the hateful
    aggressiveness of millions of non-integrable and
    unassimilable immigrants, there is indeed a great deal
    for us to deal with and to make us dizzy.

    Pessimists predict that we are destined to vanish off
    the face of history, in favour of an inferior civilisation.
    And it is precisely in order to prove these predictions
    wrong that we must enter the arena and give battle.

    THE DE-MIGRATION OF THE AFTERWAR

    As it unleashes its fury and grows, the coming racial
    civil war shall, through its unique violence, turn into an
    unprecedented collective trauma whose memory will
    echo across the centuries. By means of its uncontrolled
    and uncontrollable aspects, this wave of violence shall
    make possible many human reactions and solutions
    which, today, seem unimaginable.

    Moreover, the question is not whether de-migration,
    i.e. the massive repatriation of African and oriental
    populations to their countries of origin, is possible or
    not. It must be made possible, and must take place
    and commence very soon, because it is both
    necessary and vital.

    It is humanly, politically and historically necessary for
    us, the white men and women of Europe, to have these
    people return home. Let me state things clearly: whether
    willingly or by force, they shall indeed leave. This is not
    only my promise, but also my prognosis.

    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:00:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424591209781876

  • GENETIC SPREAD BY TRADE ROUTES

    GENETIC SPREAD BY TRADE ROUTES

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 17:22:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148643682410729473

  • subhumans , humans, transhumans. what’s the difference between then and now? non

    subhumans , humans, transhumans. what’s the difference between then and now?

    none. we just demarcate by civilizational and genetic development.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 15:44:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148618847873896449

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953

  • EUPEDIA ONE WORLD PROJECT This is is very close to my mental map of the world. I

    EUPEDIA ONE WORLD PROJECT
    This is is very close to my mental map of the world. It is currently missing Germany and the British Isles.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-08 16:15:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148264395681779712

  • Italiens à concevoir. Allemands à construire. Britannique à financer. Français p

    Italiens à concevoir. Allemands à construire. Britannique à financer. Français pour protester pour plus de temps de vacances.

    😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-06 18:50:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147578514532704256

  • It is not a question of natural law. It is however a question of aryan aesthetic

    It is not a question of natural law. It is however a question of aryan aesthetics. it means if you are eating bugs other than when lost in the wilderness you have failed your charter for excellence, heroism, and entry into the afterlife. 😉 lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-06 17:36:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147560026875281413

    Reply addressees: @VolkischWeeb @masterninja @SonaNylExile

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147476379631439873

    IN REPLY TO:

    @gothickagura

    @masterninja @SonaNylExile @curtdoolittle what is the official propertarian stance on eating bugs

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147476379631439873