Instead, Should suppression of Scientific Research be Banned when that research will solve the great questions of the day: whether ethnocentrism and nationalism (markets and eugenics.) are superior strategies than universalism, and globalism (monopoly, dysgenics)
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Male are political superpredators (ie europeans) and Females are social superpredators (ie semites). Once you see it you can’t un-see it. (Indians (Hindusthani) and their caste identity are a model to learn from. The east asians are the most interesting for even greater neoteny.)
@StefanMolyneux Just as all indo-europeans are cognitively male and compete masculine means, all Semites are cognitively female, and compete by feminine means. The science is what it is. It’s just uncomfortable.There is nothing new under the sun other than the stories we tell to hide from truth.
@StefanMolyneux Just as all indo-europeans are cognitively male and compete masculine means, all Semites are cognitively female, and compete by feminine means. The science is what it is. It’s just uncomfortable.There is nothing new under the sun other than the stories we tell to hide from truth.
Just as all indo-europeans are cognitively male and compete masculine means, all Semites are cognitively female, and compete by feminine means. The science is what it is. It’s just uncomfortable.There is nothing new under the sun other than the stories we tell to hide from truth.
@StefanMolyneux What Abrahamists are doing is systematically destroying the information system by which a high trust polity operates, by industrialization of the instinctual Female strategy (social superpredator) of undermining alphas by rallying the bottom, via women and slaves (underclasses).
@StefanMolyneux What Abrahamists are doing is systematically destroying the information system by which a high trust polity operates, by industrialization of the instinctual Female strategy (social superpredator) of undermining alphas by rallying the bottom, via women and slaves (underclasses).
“Most people” is empirically false by every measure. They like full integration with preservation of food and festival – not religion, politics, language, dress and law that compete with or conflict with the american and western civilizational strategy. (No socialism / islamism).
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
You know the answer. It’s BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL HOMOGENOUS. The data is in. Small homogenous countries are redistributive, and large heterogeneous empires are conflict ridden. Democracy is limited to kin. (And yes, I know you can’t say that.)
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
(Technically speaking Roseanna, you aren’t white: meaning one of the ethnic european gene pools – and you don’t identify as white, and you never have, and so you’re just POSING, VIRTUE SIGNALING, and a RACIST that hates white people..)
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
We’re pretty disgusted by you and we have been for decades. Get your skin colored (it’s possible) and watch what happens. That’ll put warranty behind words that are observably just virtue signals at others’ expense.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Listen. Antifa. We aren’t equal. You’re pound puppies. ok? Low Market Value. No one oppressed your ancestors. They failed at self domestication, and they just weren’t worth domesticating.
ANGLOS HAVE LOST PARITY WITH ASHKENAZI SINCE THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION DUE TO DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION: 13.9 IQ POINTS. from 113/114->100, or 1.21 IQ PER DECADE
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012
HIGHLIGHTS •We respond to a quartet of critical commentaries on Woodley et al. (2013) • We show inspection time is not a Jensen effect, unlike simple reaction time • We reanalyse data and recover dysgenic trends in simple RT • The meta-regression involving just US and UK studies shows a 13.9 IQ point decline •Emphasis should be on testing new predictions not purely methodological criticism
Abstract Previously Woodley, te Nijenhuis and Murphy (2013) tested the hypothesis that Victorian era British and American samples exhibited higher g on average than relatively more modern populations sampled from the US, UK, Canada, Australia and Finland, using measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study.
Based on 13 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1884 and 2004 yielding 16 data points we estimated a decline of − 13.35 IQ points. Here we respond to a quartet of critical commentaries on our paper penned by five prominent intelligence researchers (James Flynn, Theodore Nettelbeck, Irwin Silverman, Julia Dodonova and Yuri Dodonov).
We show via various reanalyses of the data and also via careful consideration of the arguments presented that the original finding of a potential secular decline in simple reaction time performance is robust.
A recurrent criticism of our finding stems from earlier work showing no secular trends with respect to inspection time over a 20-year period in Australia despite the possibility of co-occurring dysgenic fertility.
We deal with this via the method of correlated vectors, which reveals the presence of a ‘genetic g’ common factor on which simple RTs, WAIS g loadings and subtest heritabilities load positively and significantly, but on which inspection time does not load.
This indicates that inspection times are associated with local information processing, unlike simple reaction times, which are associated with global processing (i.e. g).
The robustness of our original finding is best illustrated however by our final meta-regression, in which the use of six methods variance-controlled reaction time means taken from the US and the UK between 1889 and 1993, coupled with a newly-estimated age-matched reference standard deviation, reveal a seemingly robust secular trend towards slowing reaction time in these two countries, which translates into a potential dysgenics rate of − 1.21 IQ points per decade, or − 13.9 points in total between 1889 and 2004.
(… ) We thank our critics for helping us to arrive at a much more precise estimate of the decline in general intelligence.