Theme: Ethnoculture

  • The British dragged you animals out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvat

    The British dragged you animals out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature – and you kicked and screamed all the way – and still do. We could have, instead of Christian ethics, emptied the world of all of you – easily.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 14:59:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183759184048865281

    Reply addressees: @Bipin_karki @CGTNOfficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183694111297064961


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Bipin_karki

    @CGTNOfficial British have always suffocated this world in past as well as at present…..its time now to bear consequences of their own deeds and Britian should also dis-integrate….Let British people enjoy Rebublic dreams…..

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183694111297064961

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic) https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/13/no-the-problem-isnt-race-its-demographics-class-in-arabic/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-13 15:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183409368575946754

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • No The Problem Isn’t Race. It’s Demographics (Class) (In Arabic)

    1. هل يمكن لذوي الذكاء المنخفض مثل العرب أن يتفوقوا على الأوروبيين معنويا وعسكريا ودبلوماسيا وقانونيا واقتصاديا؟ من الخطأ دائمًا قول هذا. الذكاء البشري يختلف عن القوة. بعض قوي بعض أضعف ، وبعض ذكي ، وبعض غير ذكي. بغض النظر عن عدد الرجال ، رجل واحد سيكون دائما أكثر ذكاء ، وذكاء رجل واحد أكثر ميزة من قوة رجل واحد. إن المشكلة بالنسبة للعرب ، مثل إفريقيا ، مثل الهند ، مثل أمريكا الجنوبية ، هي أكبر من عدد الأشخاص الموجودين في القاع ، وهي أكبر بكثير من أعداد الأشخاص الموجودين في القمة. هذا هو كل شيء يعني الذكاء. يجب أن يكون الرقم أعلى حتى تكون الحقيقة وسيادة القانون ممكنة بدون فساد. ويجب أن يكون أعلى بالنسبة للناس لإنتاج السلع التي يمكن بيعها في الأسواق العالمية. ويجب أن يكون أعلى لتنظيم الناس عن طريق الحوافز التجارية بدلا من القواعد والأوامر. أي شخص يستخدم قانون P لدينا ، ويبطئ تكاثر الأشخاص السفليين ، سيصبح مثل الأوروبيين في 100 – 150 عامًا. هذا هو وقت قصير جدا لتغيير الحضارة. الديمقراطية لا تستطيع أن تفعل هذا. يمكن للملوك أو الجنرالات فقط القيام بذلك. لأن الفقراء يريدون الترفيه عن طريق الجسم (بسيط) والأثرياء يريدون الترفيه للعقل (معقد). هذه هي المشكلة. المساواة ، على امتداد فترات زمنية طويلة ، مدمرة. هذا هو الدرس المؤلم للمسيحية والإسلام ، والهندوستان ، والصين. ما نريده ليس جيدًا بالنسبة لنا. نريد المخدرات والكحول والدعارة والقتل والسرقة والغش والكذب ، لذلك نعتقد أننا متوسطون وليس القاع. بدلاً من ذلك ، يجب أن نختار الطريق الوسط بين ما نريد ، وما هو جيد بالنسبة لنا ، والسماح لنا بالوقت للقيام بذلك. آمل أن يكون هذا مفيدا.

    ENGLISH QUESTION: Can low-IQ people like Arabs be able to outperform Europeans morally, militarily, diplomatically, legally and economically?ANSWER: It is always a mistake to say this. Human intelligence is more different than strength. Some strong some weaker, Some smart, Some not smart. No matter how many men, one man will always be smarter, and one man’s intelligence more an advantage than one man’s strength. The problem for Arabs, like Africa, like India, like South America, is than the number of people in the bottom, are too many for the number of the people at the top. This is all IQ means. The number must be higher for truth and rule of law to be possible without corruption. And it must be higher for people to produce goods that can be sold on world markets. And it must be higher to organize the people by commercial incentives instead of rules and commands. Any people that uses our P-law, and slows the reproduction of the bottom people, will become like europeans in 100 – 150 years. This is a very short time to change a civilization. Democracy cannot do this. Only kings or generals can do this. Because the poor want entertainment by the body (simple) and the wealthy want entertainment of the mind (complicated). This is the problem. Equality, over long time spans, is destructive. This is the painful lesson of christianity and islam, and Hindustan, and China. What we want is not good for us. We want drugs, alcohol, prostitution, to murder, to steal, to cheat, to lie, so believe we are average rather than the bottom. Instead, we must choose the middle road between what we want, and what is good for us, and let time do it’s work on us. I hope this is helpful.

  • ANSWER TO ARABIC DEMOGRAPHICS POSTED ON OUR SITE FB censored the post where an A

    http://propertarianism.com/blogCENSORED ANSWER TO ARABIC DEMOGRAPHICS POSTED ON OUR SITE

    FB censored the post where an Arabic Speaker asked me to explain how a group with a lower average IQ could achieve european standards of living.

    I explained that it is not an IQ problem but a population demographic problem. And in fact, with very rare exceptions, this is in general, the rule for all human groups. The difference between groups is almost entirely the product of the possibility of reproduction by the lower classes. If it’s possible the problem will be worse, if it’s harder it will be better. This is just the boring science of why climate and farming together put so much pressure on developing intelligence and Conscientiousness. It didn’t make people smarter, it lowered the number of people that could survive farming and winters. In other words, different groups are not better or worse, but the sizes of the classes in different groups create economic and political difficulties for some, and eliminate difficulties for others. This is why middle and upper classes the world over get along just fine, but the lower middle, working, and underclasses cause conflicts with each other.

    Despite my attempt to provide a rebuttal to counter hate speech, someone reported the post, and facebook censored it. I agreed with the decision in order to prevent conflict.

    This is why I am careful about who I allow in my friends list – it’s not the people that friend me that are the problem, it’s the people in YOUR friends list.

    If you want the answer to the question in Arabic see our web site: propertarianism.com/blog http://propertarianism.com/blog “The Problem Isn’t Race It’s Demographics”.Updated Oct 13, 2019, 12:00 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-13 12:00:00 UTC

  • WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE Let me put it in perspective

    WESTERN MAN’S UNIQUENESS IN PURPOSE: RAISED TO RULE

    Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not.

    I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel.

    The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation.

    And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 21:02:00 UTC

  • Yes it is really like that over there. And that’s nothing compared to what they

    Yes it is really like that over there. And that’s nothing compared to what they do to homosexuals. And it’s shocking when a non-white tries to get into a club and the ‘face control’ at the door won’t let you in.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 14:42:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183030299397185538

    Reply addressees: @broom327 @edolinsky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182762963142352898


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182762963142352898

  • GROUP DIFFERENCES IN BODY AND COGNITION 1. degree of neoteny (limited maturity)

    GROUP DIFFERENCES IN BODY AND COGNITION

    1. degree of neoteny (limited maturity) Paedomorphic vs Peramorphic traits,

    2. rate and duration of maturity (time in maturity) slow = plasticity

    3. degree of dimorphism and bias dimorphic bias

    Asian: fast maturity, shallow maturity, low dimorphism, -?

    West: slow maturity, deep maturity, high dimorphism, F-bias

    African: fast maturity, deep maturity, low dimorphism. M-Bias

    The San People (africa) have neotenous traits relative to Caucasoids: large brain, light skin pigment, less hairy, round-headed, bulging forehead, small cranial sinuses, flat roof of the nose, small face, small mastoid processes, wide eye separation, median eye fold, short stature and horizontal penis

    We need narrow the causes down but the data is pretty consistent and it’s interesting.

    paedomorphosis and peramorphosis.

    These terms refer to deceleration and acceleration of development, respectively.

    Neoteny refers to retention of juvenile features into adulthood, Neoteny falls under paedomorphosis, as physical development of features is slowed. Peramorphic is the opposite such as Large noses and long legs


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 21:32:00 UTC

  • FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROU

    FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROUP STATUS.
    by Bill Joslin (via Justin Allred)
    (canon)

    Better stated as in-group members pay for membership via… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=481655902431305&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 10:59:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182249374912520193

  • FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROU

    FALLACY OF WHITE PRIVILEGE: DEMANDING INGROUP BENEFITS WHILE MAINTAINING OUTGROUP STATUS.

    by Bill Joslin (via Justin Allred)

    (canon)

    Better stated as in-group members pay for membership via opportunity cost to not betray in-group trust.

    The incentive is clear.

    The benefits of maintaining membership outweighs the opportunity costs of not betraying trust of the in-group.

    This framing now includes class. Lower classes are on the cusp of this equation where betraying ingroup trust outweighs membership (i.e. crime and fraud).

    And outgroup members have no benefit of membership so have no incentive to take on the opportunity cost.

    “White privilege” distills down to outgroup con-artistry for why they should have ingroup benefits without paying the cost of membership….

    And now we have the crux of the liberal philosophy and the common interests between lower class, migrants, academics and unassimilated sub-groups… All demanding ingroup benefits while maintaining outgroup status.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 06:59:00 UTC