Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • THE UNDERMINED OUR THIRD WAY ON PURPOSE —“We import millions of people, and as

    THE UNDERMINED OUR THIRD WAY ON PURPOSE

    —“We import millions of people, and as they start to commit crime because of the oppressive system, which wipes out the unlucky ones, Steven Pinker publishes a book about how we never had less crime. Or something like that.”—@ArturBooth

    But that’s the whole point of our system: The Third Way. Neither priesthood(poor) or aristocracy(strong) but the third way (meritocracy and the natural law of tort). The question is, why did we in ’65 under Johnson’s Great Society imitation of the Soviets, bring in underclasses?

    They did it on purpose to DESTROY OUR THIRD WAY through immigration. They failed with economic marxism. The failed with cultural marxism. They failed with postmodernism. But they succeeded in destroying the west only because of immigrating people who can’t exist under The Third Way.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 12:48:00 UTC

  • ART AS EXAMPLE. DOES “ANGLO” JUST MEAN ELITIST? YES. (useful for the analysis of

    ART AS EXAMPLE. DOES “ANGLO” JUST MEAN ELITIST? YES.

    (useful for the analysis of art)

    —“Pseudoprofound bullshit titles made abstract art pieces appear more profound. “On this basis, one may expect the presence of bullshit to be widespread in the abstract art world.”—Rolf Degen @DegenRolf

    —“Oh, shocking, words can generate meaning! And meaning increases value: Wow! Who ever would have guessed?”—Jason Powell@KillerkattArt

    Actually, it’s not ‘meaning’ it’s ‘sentiment’. Not only can we use words communicate meaning (reason), but we can load (sentiments), and usually by means of suggestion (deception). The ‘big lies’ are all constructed by this method, and postmodernism institutionalized it.

    —“I feel like your comment highlights why strictly anglophone philosophers are poorly equipped to analyze art.”—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    I studied at one of the best theoretical art schools in America, and art theory and criticism was my first (and still best) work. One can make truthful (technical) claims. And one can make experiential claims. And one can make political claims. Or one can conflate them (lie).

    The optimum analysis of any work, set of works, movement’s work, or civilization’s work, is to produce all three analyses and put them in competition with truth(meaning), beauty (aesthetics), excellence (craft), to discover what influenced the artist (context-puppet).

    …………………..Truth(meaning)…………..

    ………………………/…………..\……….

    ..Beauty(experience) — Excellence(craft)

    And compare the set of influences and context-puppets to one another, to understand the total meaning of the work whether technological, emotional (self), political (political), or context (universal). I can state any and all of those analyses of any work. As should any student.

    ………….Political………..

    …………/………..\…………

    Emotional — Technological

    Past->……Universal…..<-Present

    Now the next step is to explore the difference between creators who understand their CRAFT as a set of those techniques, for evoking human experience (actors, directors, and editors the best current examples). And those who merely fantasize that they’re not self-pleasuring.

    playing > student > laborer > craftsman > artist > innovator.

    And the next is not to pander to them, or the pretense that postwar art is critique (undermining) is any different from the idiot in the meeting who reminds us of some obvious pedantry for attention and contributes nothing except friction to development of innovations.

    Subtractive <—– Current Condition —–> Addative

    It’s not that I’m Anglo, it’s that I’m ELITIST. If Elitism is synonymous with Anglo, Which I think it is, then that’s fine with me. I haven’t seen anything out of the continent that is anything other than simpering Rousseauian want for return of the lies of the church.

    —“I don’t mean to knock your style or education. I just feel that if you need to construct a box with predesignated specific language that requires others to get in your box to talk about something then the result is insular and alienating.”—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    You mean, like every single other discipline in the world? Like, literature? Scriptwriting? The play? What do you think they teach you in art school?

    Truth is insular and alienating – that’s why we have it. If it wasn’t we wouldn’t need it. Truth provides the DECIDABLE, not PREFERABLE.

    Here is what I was after: is it art (additive) or is it defecating in public for attention (subtractive)? What is the demarcation between additive and subtractive in art?

    I know you’re a good person. This is my job, and you just provided me with an opportunity to educate others.

    —“Are you sure that your personal categories of “additive” and “subtractive” tells us anything?”—“—Jason Powell @KillerkattArt

    Do you think I’m so absolutely exasperatingly, frustratingly, and annoyingly, (and arrogantly) persistent in driving to first causes without knowing the first causes? 😉

    If it isn’t decidable I say so.

    If it’s decidable I say so.

    Irritating. I know… lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 10:28:00 UTC

  • Peter Frost (2008) Sexual selection and human geographic variation; (2010) The R

    Peter Frost (2008) Sexual selection and human geographic variation; (2010) The Roman State and genetic pacification;
    (2013). Evo and Proud: Making Europeans kinder, gentler.
    Frost, Peter and Harpending, Henry (2015) Western Europe, State Formation, and Genetic Pacification;

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-28 23:09:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200189973875564545

    Reply addressees: @UnknownLone @TTheft10 @AxelSavage4 @RickyBobby_USA @Staargaizer @EconCircus @rangermonk1 @TheAliceSmith @CONSMILITIA @WillyG_4Liberty @LibertarianJay @the_jon_a_thon @The3rdObserver @J_Edward65 @MonicaPerezShow @freedomactradio @stealthgoat1 @JohnMarkSays @LibertyHammy @anxcap @MrPseu @PaulTheMartian @de_werlang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200161007659868162

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200161007659868162

  • Is that true? USA and France and increasingly russia, are autarkic. We aren’t de

    Is that true? USA and France and increasingly russia, are autarkic. We aren’t dependent on anyone at all. if we ended international policing, eliminated our ‘minorities’, and took up the japanese model, we’d be be a debt-free country. If we automated we’d have 4 day weeks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-27 21:59:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199810092482387969

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199733186101678080

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1199733186101678080

  • THE GERMANIC METHOD OF CALCULATING DESCENT THROUGH BOTH MALE AND FEMALE LINES vi

    THE GERMANIC METHOD OF CALCULATING DESCENT THROUGH BOTH MALE AND FEMALE LINES

    via Lisa Outhwaite

    ‘Maitland was well aware that the current anthropological orthodoxy, for instance in the work of Sir Henry Maine, was that all societies, including the Teutonic peoples, had gone through a period of agnatic kinship, that is, descent flowing through the male gender, leading to the formation of powerful clans or, as anthropologists call them, unilineal descent groups. Yet detailed study of Tacitus and the codes of the Anglo-Saxons and other materials did not bear out this evolutionary sequence. Maitland first worked back to the thirteenth century text of Bracton, which showed a system of tracing descent through both males and females which is identical to that which is used in England today.5 He then took the analysis back to the Anglo-Saxon period. In a section on ‘Antiquities’ he showed that Anglo-Saxon kinship was bilateral or cognatic, tracing descent through both genders, and hence the formation of exclusive groups or clans which could have been the basis for political and legal action, was impossible.

    Thus ‘we ought not to talk of clans at all’ for ‘our English law’. Such groups could not act as the bedrock of the politico-legal system. Whatever the earliest unrecorded history, ‘What seems plain is that the exclusive domination of either “father-right” or “mother-right”…should be placed for our race beyond the extreme limit of history.’ The absence of the patriarchal or patrilineal family, he argued had nothing to do with Christianity – its emergence ‘we certainly cannot ascribe to the influence of Christianity.’ The Germanic method of calculating descent through both male and female lines, preserved in England, was very different from the method of calculating through the male line alone, characteristic of the later Roman Empire even after the spread of Christianity.’

    – F.W. MAITLAND AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD, by Macfarlane.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-26 12:54:00 UTC

  • HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO HAZARD? (Then, go thru the rest o

    HOW MANY OF THESE ARE OBTAINED BY BAITING INTO

    HAZARD?

    (Then, go thru the rest of the Forbes list, and discover how the white people made their money. )

    MERIT

    3 Lawrence Ellison 27,000 65 Redwood City Oracle (earned)

    13 Michael Dell 14,500 44 Austin Dell

    INGROUP MONEY RAISE ADVANTAGE W/MERIT

    11 Sergey Brin 15,300 36 Palo Alto Google

    11 Larry Page 15,300 36 San Francisco Google

    158 Mark Zuckerberg 2,000 25 Palo Alto Facebook

    WINDFALL VIA OTHERS’ EFFORTS – NO MERIT

    14 Steven Ballmer 13,300 53 Seattle Microsoft(Via Gates)

    326 Margaret Whitman 1,200 53 Atherton Ebay(Via Others)

    INGROUP MONEY RAISE – NO MERIT – RENT SEEKING

    123 Mitchell Rales 2,500 53 Washington Danaher Corp **

    123 Steven Rales 2,500 58 Washington Danaher Corp **

    296 Jeremy Jacobs Sr. 1,300 69 East Aurora sports concessions

    326 John E. Abele 1,200 72 Shelburne healthcare **

    8 Michael Bloomberg 17,500 67 New York Bloomberg

    15 George Soros 13,000 79 Westchester hedge funds

    16 Donald Bren 12,000 77 Newport Beach real estate

    22 Carl Icahn 10,500 73 New York leveraged buyouts

    23 Ronald Perelman 10,000 66 New York leveraged buyouts

    24 George B. Kaiser 9,500 67 Tulsa oil & gas, banking

    26 Sheldon Adelson 9,000 76 Las Vegas casinos, hotels

    29 James Simons 8,500 71 East Setauket hedge funds

    36 Steven Cohen 6,400 53 Greenwich hedge funds

    42 Eli Broad 5,400 76 Los Angeles investments

    44 Len Blavatnik 5,000 52 London Access Industries

    44 David Geffen 5,000 66 Malibu movies, music

    44 Ira Rennert 5,000 75 New York investments

    49 Charles Ergen 4,900 56 Denver EchoStar **

    50 Stephen Schwarzman 4,700 62 New York investments

    52 Samuel I. (Si) Newhouse Jr. 4,500 81 New York publishing

    56 Micky Arison 4,300 60 Bal Harbour Carnival Cruises

    61 Ralph Lauren 4,200 70 New York fashion

    65 Lester Crown & family 4,000 84 Wilmette investments

    65 Richard LeFrak & family 4,000 64 New York real estate

    65 Donald Newhouse 4,000 79 Somerset County publishing

    65 Daniel Ziff 4,000 37 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    65 Dirk Ziff 4,000 45 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    65 Robert Ziff 4,000 43 New York inheritance, hedge funds

    77 Henry Kravis 3,800 65 New York leveraged buyouts

    77 Paul Milstein & family 3,800 87 New York Emigrant, real estate

    77 Samuel Zell 3,800 68 Chicago real estate, private equity

    84 Leonard N. Stern 3,600 71 New York real estate

    85 Stanley Druckenmiller 3,500 56 Pittsburgh hedge funds

    85 Bruce Kovner 3,500 64 New York hedge funds

    85 George Roberts 3,500 66 San Francisco leveraged buyouts

    97 Riley P. Bechtel 3,000 57 San Francisco engineering, construction**

    97 Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. 3,000 84 San Francisco engineering, construction**

    97 Leonard Lauder 3,000 76 New York Estee Lauder

    97 Theodore Lerner 3,000 84 Washington real estate

    97 Steven Spielberg 3,000 62 Pacific Palisades movies

    97 Warren Stephens 3,000 52 Little Rock Stephens Inc. **

    97 David Tepper 3,000 52 Milburn hedge funds

    110 Stephen Ross 2,900 69 New York real estate

    113 Daniel Och 2,800 48 New York hedge funds

    113 Haim Saban 2,800 65 Beverly Hills television

    118 Joan Tisch 2,600 83 New York Loews

    123 Edgar M. Bronfman 2,500 80 New York liquor

    123 Ronald Lauder 2,500 65 New York Estee Lauder

    123 David Rubenstein 2,500 60 Bethesda leveraged buyouts

    139 Mark Cuban 2,400 51 Dallas Broadcast.com http://Broadcast.com

    139 Malcolm Glazer & family 2,400 81 Palm Beach sports teams, real estate

    141 Steve Wynn 2,300 67 Las Vegas casinos, hotels **

    147 Tom Gores 2,200 45 Beverly Hills leveraged buyouts

    147 Bruce Wasserstein 2,200 61 New York Wasserstein Perella, Lazard

    158 Nicolas Berggruen 2,000 48 New York Investments

    158 Leon Black 2,000 58 New York leveraged buyouts

    158 William Gross 2,000 65 Laguna Beach bonds **

    158 Michael Milken 2,000 63 Los Angeles investments

    158 Sumner Redstone 2,000 86 Beverly Hills Viacom

    158 Leslie Wexner 2,000 72 New Albany Limited Brands

    183 Stewart Rahr 1,950 63 New York Kinray

    193 Alan Casden 1,850 63 Beverly Hills real estate

    196 Thomas Pritzker 1,800 59 Chicago hotels, investments

    196 Jerry Speyer 1,800 69 New York real estate

    204 Israel Englander 1,700 61 New York hedge funds

    204 Penny Pritzker 1,700 50 Chicago hotels, investments

    204 Sheldon Solow 1,700 81 New York real estate

    212 Robert Friedland 1,650 59 Singapore mining

    212 Henry Samueli 1,650 55 Newport Beach Broadcom

    220 Thomas Friedkin 1,600 74 Houston Gulf States Toyota

    220 Alec Gores 1,600 56 Beverly Hills leveraged buyouts

    220 Irwin Jacobs 1,600 76 La Jolla Qualcomm

    220 Anthony Pritzker 1,600 48 Los Angeles hotels, investments

    220 Jay Robert Pritzker 1,600 44 Evanston hotels, investments

    230 John Morgridge 1,550 76 Portola Valley Cisco ** (NETA with Jewish Agency)

    230 Isaac Perlmutter 1,550 67 Palm Beach Marvel

    230 Wilma Tisch 1,550 82 New York Loews

    236 Neil Bluhm 1,500 71 Chicago real estate

    236 Robert Kraft 1,500 68 Brookline New England Patriots

    236 Stephen Mandel 1,500 53 Greenwich hedge funds

    236 Daniel Pritzker 1,500 50 Marin County hotels, investments

    236 James Pritzker 1,500 58 Chicago hotels, investments

    236 Jean (Gigi) Pritzker 1,500 47 Chicago hotels, investments

    236 John Pritzker 1,500 56 San Francisco hotels, investments

    236 Karen Pritzker 1,500 51 New Haven hotels, investments

    236 Linda Pritzker 1,500 55 St. Ignatius hotels, investments

    236 Marc Rich 1,500 74 Meggen commodities

    236 Lynn Schusterman 1,500 70 Tulsa oil & gas, investments

    236 John Sperling 1,500 88 Phoenix Apollo Group

    236 Mortimer Zuckerman 1,500 72 New York real estate, media

    272 George Lindemann & family 1,450 73 Palm Beach investments

    272 Bernard Marcus 1,450 80 Atlanta Home Depot

    277 S. Daniel Abraham 1,400 85 Palm Beach Slim-Fast

    277 John Arrillaga 1,400 72 Palo Alto real estate

    277 Alfred Mann 1,400 83 Los Angeles medical devices

    277 Michael Moritz 1,400 55 Mountain View venture capital

    277 Michael Price 1,400 57 Far Hills investments

    277 Tamir Sapir 1,400 62 New York real estate

    277 Alfred Taubman 1,400 85 Bloomfield Hills real estate

    289 Ken Fisher 1,350 58 Woodside Money management **

    289 David Gottesman 1,350 83 Rye investments

    289 Marc Lasry 1,350 49 New York hedge funds (92nd Street Y)

    296 Edmund Ansin 1,300 73 Miami Sunbeam Broadcasting

    296 Ron Baron 1,300 66 New York money management

    296 Leon Charney 1,300 68 New York Real estate

    296 Glenn Dubin 1,300 52 New York hedge funds

    296 Donald Fisher 1,300 81 San Francisco Gap

    296 Doris Fisher 1,300 78 San Francisco Gap

    296 Gary Michelson 1,300 60 Los Angeles medical patents

    317 Arthur Blank 1,250 67 Atlanta Home Depot

    317 Jeffrey Greene 1,250 54 Miami Beach real estate, investments

    317 Thomas H. Lee 1,250 65 New York leveraged buyouts

    317 Herbert Simon 1,250 74 Indianapolis real estate

    317 Peter Sperling 1,250 49 Phoenix Apollo Group

    326 Norman Braman 1,200 77 Miami art, car dealerships

    326 John Fisher 1,200 48 San Francisco Gap

    326 Nicholas Pritzker 1,200 65 Chicago hotels, investments

    326 Alexander Rovt 1,200 57 Brooklyn fertilizer

    341 Leon Cooperman 1,150 66 Short Hills hedge funds

    341 Barry Diller 1,150 67 New York IAC/InterActiveCorp

    341 Joseph Mansueto 1,150 53 Chicago Morningstar **

    347 Marc Benioff 1,100 45 San Francisco Salesforce.com http://Salesforce.com

    347 A. James Clark 1,100 81 Easton Construction **

    347 Robert Fisher 1,100 56 San Francisco Gap

    347 Alan Gerry 1,100 80 Liberty cable television**

    347 James Irsay 1,100 50 Carmel Indianapolis Colts (Father, Bob was Jewish)

    347 Michael Krasny 1,100 56 Highland Park CDW Corp 3

    347 Daniel Snyder 1,100 44 Potomac Washington Redskins

    347 Henry Swieca 1,100 52 New York hedge funds

    366 Peter Lewis 1,050 75 Coconut Grove Progressive Corp

    366 Nelson Peltz 1,050 67 Bedford Investments

    371 William Fisher 1,000 52 San Francisco Gap

    371 Pincus Green 1,000 74 Jerusalem commodities

    371 Jeffry Picower 1,000 67 Palm Beach investments

    371 Steven Schonfeld 1,000 50 Westbury Proprietary Trading

    371 Walter Shorenstein & family 1,000 94 San Francisco real estate

    371 Evgeny (Eugene) Shvidler 1,000 45 London Millhouse LLC

    371 Charles Zegar 1,000 61 New York Bloomberg LP

    394 Jeffrey Lurie 980 58 Haverford Philadelphia Eagles

    396 Nancy Lerner 960 49 Cleveland inheritance

    396 Norma Lerner 960 73 Cleveland inheritance

    396 Randolph Lerner 960 47 Cleveland inheritance

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 13:56:00 UTC

  • VAN CREVELD ON THE JUSTIFIABLY ANGRY WHITE WORKING AND UNDERCLASSES Nov 25, 2019

    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/white-trash/MARTIN VAN CREVELD ON THE JUSTIFIABLY ANGRY WHITE WORKING AND UNDERCLASSES

    http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/white-trash/Updated Nov 25, 2019, 9:23 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-25 09:23:00 UTC

  • OUR PEOPLE DON’T DO. Nov 23, 2019, 9:25 PM

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/with-schools-out-early-mayhem-breaks-out-at-mall-in-queensTHINGS OUR PEOPLE DON’T DO.

    https://www.fox5ny.com/news/with-schools-out-early-mayhem-breaks-out-at-mall-in-queensUpdated Nov 23, 2019, 9:25 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-23 21:25:00 UTC

  • “It’s Just Neoteny, Stupid.” The principle difference between the macro, major,

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acOZT240bTAOr, “It’s Just Neoteny, Stupid.” The principle difference between the macro, major, and minor races, is the degree of neoteny due to the rate and depth of maturity. Otherwise it is the developmental difference in the female (herd) or male (pack) brain structure. Videos

    1 – Domestication and Human Evolution: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acOZT240bTA

    2 – Domestication and Neural Crest Cells: https://youtu.be/LIoIu1f7qdE

    3 – Neotenous Cells in the Developing Human Brain: https://youtu.be/0dHbfgMlfGg

    4 – The Domesticated Brain: https://youtu.be/jGghoLXet9k

    5 – Cranio-Facial Feminization in Evolution: https://youtu.be/awilQhCSyaA

    6 – Cranio Facial Feminization Wolf, Fox, Dog: https://youtu.be/VaS-teo33Zo

    7 – Fox Domestication: https://youtu.be/ftjN2BQL_HQ

    8 – Wolf to Dog Domestication: https://youtu.be/YCnT2pEMBbM

    9 – Did Homo Sapiens Self Domesticate? : https://youtu.be/u1fNCTg0f4E

    10 – Domesticated Brain – Gene Expression in the Brain: https://youtu.be/vQdjZGaKc4oUpdated Nov 22, 2019, 3:43 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-22 15:43:00 UTC

  • well, you know, there is some utility in exiting from the gene pool, those who w

    well, you know, there is some utility in exiting from the gene pool, those who would make bad choices. I’ve made it possible for parents with mixed children who were misled by the ‘liars’ to sue to those liars, and those institutions, for their crimes (frauds).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-21 15:33:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197538410430418953

    Reply addressees: @natrolleon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197522973537660928

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1197522973537660928