1) Pathological altruism is incorrect. It’s a high trust polity. We are the only people on earth to have developed it. Technically speaking or geography and mixed agrarian pastoralism prevented power centralization and required professional warriors and a miltia.
Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
1) Pathological altruism is incorrect. It’s a high trust polity. We are the only
-
9 So like I said. Your group strategy has killed over a billion and cost us five
9 So like I said. Your group strategy has killed over a billion and cost us five great civilizations, reducing them to ignorance and ashes, and is just about to cost us this one. The few million europeans killed by conquest or smallpox don’t move the needle in comparison to you.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 14:35:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276524537992151041
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276524128607055872
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll 8 So like I said. We are all ‘bots’ running ancient cultural software that we either created to respond to our genetic strategy, or we developed cultural software to compete and adapted to it – or both. The end result is, everywhere you go civlization, thought, and genetics die.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276524128607055872
-
9 So like I said. Your group strategy has killed over a billion and cost us five
9 So like I said. Your group strategy has killed over a billion and cost us five great civilizations, reducing them to ignorance and ashes, and is just about to cost us this one. The few million europeans killed by conquest or smallpox don’t move the needle in comparison to you.
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll -
8 So like I said. We are all ‘bots’ running ancient cultural software that we ei
8 So like I said. We are all ‘bots’ running ancient cultural software that we either created to respond to our genetic strategy, or we developed cultural software to compete and adapted to it – or both. The end result is, everywhere you go civlization, thought, and genetics die.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 14:34:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276524128607055872
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276523580268961793
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll 7 So you require hosts to produce commons you cannot produce yourselves (female strategy). You resist selection pressure “leaving any behind” (female strategy). You resist dominant male hierarchies by undermining (female strategy). You undermine by GSRRM, and Critique. (Female..)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276523580268961793
-
8 So like I said. We are all ‘bots’ running ancient cultural software that we ei
8 So like I said. We are all ‘bots’ running ancient cultural software that we either created to respond to our genetic strategy, or we developed cultural software to compete and adapted to it – or both. The end result is, everywhere you go civlization, thought, and genetics die.
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll -
5 The jewish intellectual program of freud-boaz,marx-all, adorno-fromm, derrida,
5 The jewish intellectual program of freud-boaz,marx-all, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan, and you – is just another in the long history of hating europeans for following physical natural and evolutionary laws resulting in eugenics, so surplus can be devoted to commons not births.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 14:27:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276522394287513600
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276521616885854208
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll 4 So in reaction to the industrial revolution, the europeans were working (correctly) on eugenics, so that (as has occurred) we would not reverse our evolution by shifting the distribution. Because a rule of law civ requires about 105 – 110 median, (now 98).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276521616885854208
-
5 The jewish intellectual program of freud-boaz,marx-all, adorno-fromm, derrida,
5 The jewish intellectual program of freud-boaz,marx-all, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan, and you – is just another in the long history of hating europeans for following physical natural and evolutionary laws resulting in eugenics, so surplus can be devoted to commons not births.
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll -
3 Darwin exposed the fact that european civlization (like east asian) has been,
3 Darwin exposed the fact that european civlization (like east asian) has been, for 3500 years, eugenic at large scale the way jewish is eugenic at tiny scale, and profiting from the incremental domestication (genetic pacification) of generations.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 14:19:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276520356006842371
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276519743718129665
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll 2 The jewish strategy repeated the successful strategy of the abrahamic dark ages (judaism, christianity, islam), by rallying women, underclasses, and immigrants, with the false promise of freedom from European civilizations’ continuation of selection pressure via markets in all.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276519743718129665
-
3 Darwin exposed the fact that european civlization (like east asian) has been,
3 Darwin exposed the fact that european civlization (like east asian) has been, for 3500 years, eugenic at large scale the way jewish is eugenic at tiny scale, and profiting from the incremental domestication (genetic pacification) of generations.
Reply addressees: @pinkhippos10 @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll -
I didn’t even think it would be controversial. It’s rather obvious that its not
I didn’t even think it would be controversial. It’s rather obvious that its not religion but genetics and adaptation. Why is that even… vaguely controversial.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 04:03:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276365500864499713
Reply addressees: @NaOHBartfield
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276363875265503233