Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “Curt, why was the beneficent WASP elite of the first 150 years of America repla

    –“Curt, why was the beneficent WASP elite of the first 150 years of America replaced by hostile ethnic Powers That Be? Fatigue? Malice?”–

    Great Question:
    1. The end of the emphasis on families demonstrating tradition and loyalty (cultural nobility), success at performance in military or industry, and the conversion of those ‘natural elites’ to those without demonstrated capacity or success in real world environments via credentialism in the academy – which is just, as is obvious at present, a secular clerisy. At least, outside of the subset of the STEM disciplines.
    2. While it does not seem to have been detrimental to expand the franchise to all white males in the early 19th century – it was so by the latter part of the century. This problem could ahve been avoided by opening the Franchise but only a new lower House, that had only veto and assent powers, not the capacity to introduce legislation. Worse, the introduction of women into the voting pool in 1920, without giving them a separate house of government, being the worst thing political decision we have made. Without that mistake there would be no left shift in politics after the war. Combined with direct election of the senators, by passing their appointment by the legislatures, thus further disempowering governors and states, and increasing the problem of mass democracy.
    So basically we took away all the loyalty and responsibility safeguards that were built into the traditional method of government.
    3. And as such these people set about undermining our common natural law and concurrent legislation trying constantly to impose policy that encourage and financed irresponsibility under the auspices of charity and care. The consequences have been, and are approaching the severity under which rome fell, and the dark ages followed.
    Cheers
    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-18 23:05:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791968394129952768

  • Hans’ argument here is nonsense, despite humorous, and succeeding in making his

    Hans’ argument here is nonsense, despite humorous, and succeeding in making his point, Hoppe is German, Mises, Friedman and Rothbard are Jewish, and Hayek is german cum english, and I”m anglo American – classical liberals.
    Each of us brought our cultures and our cultural means of argument to the counter-revolution against the marxist-sequence seditious invasion.
    If we start from the recognition that these Jewish authors were from the Jewish separatist diasporic culture, Hoppe influenced by the german city state culture, and Hayek(eventually) and myself from the classical liberal culture, then in this discussion Hoppe seeks to cast classical liberals (Hayek) as leftists rather than Jews then Germans, then anglos increasingly successful at developing institutions of social, economic, intellectual political, military, and geostrategic expertise at scale.
    Now, Mises and Rothbard are correct that libertarianism is superior for the upper middle and middle classes, just as communism and socialism for the lower middle, working and lower classes. Hoppe is correct in that his city state or even village-state anarchism is better for the middle and working classes. And hayek (and I) is correct for all classes in maximizing the size of the middle class.
    With unfortunately, Hoppe being correct that it is democracy, or at least the introduction of those without demonstrated capacity for both productivity, and responsibility for more than just themselves into the voting pool. With, the rather obvious rapid deceleration by the inclusion of women in the voting pool.
    So regardless of how it’s said, Hayek (and I) recommend expansion of rule of law of natural law – Hayek by recognition of informal capital (which Hoppe and Rothbard and Mises ignore, despite property being an informal capital), and myself expanding the law to equally suppress the female methods of antisocial, anti-intellectual, anti-economic, and anti-political warfare as much as the male – while recognizing that the abrahamic religions and marxist sequence are simply applications of the female means of seduction, influence, manipulation, undermining, baiting into hazard, sedition and treason against the natural aristocracy and the meritocracy that evolve from the application of western natural law of tort which we call equity – and non aggression against demonstrated interests.

    Affections all
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @HoppeQuotes


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-18 15:08:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791848452940316672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791128724999651416

  • Hispanic crime moderates within a generation or two, but approaches white, not b

    Hispanic crime moderates within a generation or two, but approaches white, not black, in per capita crimes.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-17 23:36:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791613892013019478

    Reply addressees: @PRESJFK1963 @UltraDane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791347530954903943

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Exploring the terms – “Whiteness” represents o

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Exploring the terms –

    “Whiteness” represents one of many human domestication strategies (the interface…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 06:05:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790986807003246939

  • I’d explain it here but I”m tired. So, if you have a wider distribution you will

    I’d explain it here but I”m tired. So, if you have a wider distribution you will produce more outliers. What’s odd is that ashkenazi outliers are NOT the same as european outliers, in that they still appear to rely on the feminine cognitive pictoral-verbal bias, and not the model-transformation bias of europeans. I would add one bit of insight, in that the empathic, verbal, bi-hemispheric female organization of the brain is capable of working longer at lower energy than the male hemispheric bias of spatio-temporal modeling. Which is the best description of how to get the difference across.

    Reply addressees: @Areez22 @grbradsk


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-15 20:55:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790848610143281152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790847711220035613

  • RT @whatifalthist: So, we all know the Great Replacement is real and happening r

    RT @whatifalthist: So, we all know the Great Replacement is real and happening right now right? I don’t know how you could conceivably not.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-15 14:36:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790753006243180615

  • EVEN MORE NEOTENY – THE ORIGIN OF RACE DIFFERENCES

    EVEN MORE NEOTENY – THE ORIGIN OF RACE DIFFERENCES https://twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1790417804832678118

  • “Q: How Can Half Of The Population Be Worse Than The Other Half?”– How can wome

    –“Q: How Can Half Of The Population Be Worse Than The Other Half?”–

    How can women have less agency on average than men? How can less neotenous races have less agency than those of greater neoteny? How can low trust societies have less agency than those with high trust? How can upper classes have less agency than lower? How can teens have less agency on average that adults? How can children have less agency on average than teens? How can infants have less agency than children?

    The scale, quality, isolation, duration of maturity(growth) of the regions of the brain, and in particular the degree of maturation of the prefrontal cortex.

    That’s how.

    CD

    Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator @RomanEagle6 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 20:17:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790476646807392256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790472263763976227

  • MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION |VERSU

    MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION

    |VERSUS|: Europeans: Aristocracy, History and Natural Law
    vs
    Semites: Priesthood, Mythicism and Authoritarian Law.

    Context (Origins)
    Much of the mythicism in the Abrahamic tradition is relatively recent (between the 2nd century BCE and the 1st century AD) aligns with the period of Hellenistic influence and the formation of key texts and ideas in Judaism and early Christianity.
    During this time, Jewish thought was influenced by Greek philosophy, and significant religious literature, including the Dead Sea Scrolls and the apocryphal and pseudepigraphal writings, was produced.
    This period also saw the development of the Pharisaic and early Rabbinic traditions, which further shaped Jewish and Christian religious thought.

    Mythicism (Covey Meaning Produced by Others)
    Mythicism refers the production of fictional history by incorporating events, people, myths, legends, loading, framing, and propaganda. The audience is left with the responsibility of interpreting these figures or stories as symbolic, allegorical, or fictional, rather than as real, historical events or individuals. Mythicism was, historically the interpretation of ‘wisdom literatures’ produced by mythicism especially among south eurasians from the west coast of north africa to the east coast of India. The Chinese chose a philosophy of harmony (social), and somewhat mythologized the past. The europeans chose rational (legal, political) philosophy and sought to produce history (legal evidence).

    Properties of Mythicism:
    – Symbolic Interpretation: Mythicism interprets religious or historical narratives as symbolic or allegorical, often conveying deeper truths or cultural values.
    – Skeptical of Historicity: Mythicists often question or deny the historical existence of certain figures (e.g., Jesus Christ in some versions of Jesus myth theory).
    – Cultural and Religious Context: Myths are seen as products of their cultural and religious contexts, reflecting the beliefs, values, and practices of the people who created them.
    – Narrative Structure: Mythic narratives often involve supernatural elements, deities, or heroes, and serve to explain natural phenomena, human behavior, or cultural traditions.

    History (Derive Meaning Yourself From Evidence)
    History consists of the study of past events, particularly those involving human activities, societies, and civilizations. It is based on the critical analysis of evidence such as documents, artifacts, and other records, aiming to reconstruct and understand past realities.

    Properties of History:
    – Empirical Evidence: Historical study relies on empirical evidence, including written records, archaeological findings, and other material artifacts.
    – Methodological Rigor: Historians use critical methods to evaluate sources, verify facts, and construct coherent narratives about the past.
    – Focus on Actual Events: History seeks to document and explain real events and developments, distinguishing between factual occurrences and fictional or mythological accounts.
    – Contextual Analysis: Historical analysis involves understanding events within their broader social, economic, political, and cultural contexts.

    Comparison of Mythicism vs History
    – Basis: Mythicism often interprets narratives as symbolic or fictional, while history focuses on factual, evidence-based accounts of past events.
    – Purpose: Myths typically serve to convey moral, philosophical, or cultural lessons, whereas history aims to provide an accurate and coherent account of what actually happened.
    – Methodology: Mythic interpretation relies on literary and cultural analysis, while historical study employs empirical research, source criticism, and contextual examination.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 20:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790474555003166720

  • I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between n

    I”m English (anglo american) though genetically there is no difference between northern France (normandy) and southern England, and little difference between them and Belgium, the Low Countries, and Denmark.

    While raised by a Breton French Catholic mother, and an english protestant father, given the family traditions, I am pretty much a Church of England protestant new England American descendent of puritans and the English middle and upper middle classes.

    I’m also an arrogant elitist snob, but at least I seek to help the little people and save them from the enemy. 😉

    Reply addressees: @finishedyet34


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 19:06:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790458730598805504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790446723883749534