ONLY A PEOPLE OF SUFFICIENT BREEDING CAN UPHOLD THE RULE OF LAW
—“Just having rule of law that’s justly or even strictly applied is often sufficient for economic velocity. … Most nations fail simply because of the corruption undermining laws – only a people of sufficient breeding can uphold the rule of law.”—Gary Knight
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 08:49:00 UTC
—“Which is something you have to do when you’re managing with “the population you have, not the one you want””—Moritz Bierling
Its a fight between forces of hierarchy and kinship in correspondence with reality versus a fight for equality and
—“So it really is a fight between civicism and religion for supremacy”—Moritz Bierling
I didn’t make the connection clear, sorry.
1) BIOLOGICAL VS INFORMATIONAL
The people you have (biological, behavioral) and the people you have (knowledge, understanding, values) are not the same criteria. Governing with the people you have (incentives, constant) is a question of possibility, and governing with the people you have (education) is merely a question of costs and externalities. we can continue to kick the can down the road and NOT produce a ‘bible’ of western civilization, that would solve the problem or we can solve the problem despite its cost, in a period where there is high demand for the solution to the problem.
2) THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM IS THE SAME
Civicism, localism, nationalism, evolution, competition vs religion, universalism, globalism, devolution, corruption.
Al these problems are the same source: easy female dysgenic and boil the frog vs hard male eugenic and transcend. Our intuitions are to not pay the cost of adaptation. We have to pay that cost and train people to pay that cost without stress. Only Europeans did it. How can we evolve our concepts, norms, traditions, institutions, so that we continue to evolve man rather than regress? We know now. The problem is solvable. but it is only solvable if we win the war against the female dysgenic intuition by either conquest or separation and competitive evolution. Of those two separation is the most beneficial and the fastest since we get rid of our own.
3) THE ILLUSION WE HAVE TIME
It’s not like we have an infinite amount of time. The frequency of geological events capable of wiping out humans is higher than the frequency of climate variations. The frequency of astronomic events is lower, but it’s still continuous.
The future of mankind is decided right now. this year, next year.
A few more years and its over. there are no ‘undiscovered countries’ with reserves of ability remaining. We have exploited the pool of humans as thoroughly as exploiting the world’s resources.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 08:29:00 UTC
It’s a fight between forces of hierarchy and kinship in correspondence with reality (Social Adaptation) versus a fight for equality and universalism in denial of reality (Social Construction)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 17:24:00 UTC
PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.
PARALLEL BETWEEN GERMANY AND CHINA CHINA China was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had ethnically spread cross near countries and evolved them, China had a long educational history. China had a profound bureaucracy. China had a more than competent military China had a more than competent workforce China had an industrial advantage over the eastern continent. China had been wronged by the British empire, China had had a failed ‘new government’ with terrible consequences. GERMANY Germany was genetically, culturally, institutionally, and technologically superior and had spread across nearby countries and evolved them. Germany was the intellectual and academic core of europe. Germany had the best bureaucracy in the advanced world. Germany had a better more advanced industry and polity that was a quality advantage over the western continent. Germany had a martial aristocracy – the best in the world. Germany had been wronged by napoleon (destroying the core of Europe – the holy roman empire) Germany had been wronged in ww1 (attempting to restore herself and her people) Germany would be wronged in ww2 (attempting to restore her self and her people) THE MODEL FOR BOTH Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. An army of society. PERFECTION … BUT It was perfect for both countries. But … … AH overreached and practiced ideology over empiricism. … Just as Xi Jinping has overreached and is practicing ideology over empiricism. THIS IS THE BEST MODEL FOR MAN: Ethnonationalism, State Capitalism, State Secular Religion of Nationalism, State Intolerance for competition, State education and indoctrination, full employment, amazing benefits. The unparalleled devotion and unity not seen before. BUT THIS IS THE REASON FOR ALL FAILURE OF MAN: Ideology (or faith) over Evidence. Overreach.
GERMANIZATION OF EARLY MEDIEVAL CHRISTIANITY: 12 POINT SUMMARY
James C Russell’s ‘Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation’ (GOEMC) is an excellent study on the evolution of Christianity from a predominantly Mediterranean religion to a northern European one. [1] The book has recently gained popularity on the internet right, and it’s now regarded as a “must read” in some circles.
Russell is a conservative historian and theologian who authored another book condemning the role of organized Christianity in the facilitation of mass immigration into the United States and other Western countries. [2] Russell published GOEMC through the Oxford University Press in 1994.
SUMMARY
In GOEMC’s concluding chapter, Russell summarized his work’s twelve main points. [3]
(1) Early Christianity emerged from an urban, heterogeneous, and low social capital society. German society at the time of first contact with Christianity was rural, homogeneous, and high social capital.
(2) Early Christianity was “world rejecting” and “salvation” focused. In contrast, the pre-Christian German worldview was world accepting and socio-biological (ethnic and immediate).
(3) The first Christian missionaries to Germany accommodated Christianity to the religopolitical and magicoreligous elements of the German worldview. [4]
(4) Early efforts to convert Germans to Christ resulted in the reinterpretation of Christianity through the Germanic worldview.
(5) Catholic Christianity’s political reliance on Germanic nations, like the Franks, led to the increased influence of their interpretation of Christianity over the Western Church.
(6) Some Germanic nations attempted to preserve their unique ethnic identity and independence by adhering to Arianism rather than subjecting themselves to the outside power of Church hierarchy.
(7) The “Christianization” of the Germans was very shallow until at least the reign of Charlemagne (768 – 814) because there was no catechumanate system or qualified teachers to finish instruction. The Church prioritized baptism over teaching because they thought the apocalypse was near. The German worldview was too strong to allow full Christianization.
(8) Early missionaries to the Germans were as successful as they could have been. If they had not accommodated Christianity to the German worldview they probably would not have found any success.
(9) The initial accommodation of Christianity to the German worldview laid the foundation for later indoctrination of Christian worldview and ethics.
(10) Christian missionaries misrepresented the extent of disparity between the Germanic and Christian worldview when initially accommodating Christianity to a fresh German audience.
(11) Early Christian accommodation left Germans with the impression that Jesus was one among many magicoreligous gods to include in their pantheon. New German converts did not possess doctrinal or ethical concerns.
(12) Contributing factors to Christianity’s German spread included: the association of Christianity with Frankish political aims, an imagined causal association of Christianity with Roman grandeur, and a coincidental similarity between German myths and Christian beliefs, rituals, and symbols.
This book is in the P reading list.
Source: https://cocmillennial.blogspot.com/2016/11/germanization-of-early-medieval-christianity-review.html
(Apologies. I don’t know who sent me this link to me)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 13:45:00 UTC
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresolvable. European/East Asian advantage was eugenics, and the left’s program is a revolt against Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civ: discovering, adapting to, applying, laws of nature.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 00:16:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285730282042204160
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285728739456933890
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresolvable. European/East Asian advantage was eugenics, and the left’s program is a revolt against Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civ: discovering, adapting to, applying, laws of nature.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educatied but trust noone.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
These re just truths. How do they apply to your people? Well, that’ depends on the level of sophistication of your people. Russians are smart educatied but trust noone.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 19:53:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285664103076421634
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285660863874109441