THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUPERIORITY VS SUPREMACY
Apologies in advance but it needs to be said:
White superiority is an empirically demonstrated fact in every dimension of measurement we have discovered. But white supremacy is either a suggestion of either (a) an ambition to rule others, (b) a suggestion of responsibility for governing those less able, or (c) a false accusation against superiority – or all three.
But whites have learned by (a) repeated attempts to rule the south eurasians, (b) centuries of colonialism world wide, (c) postwar attempts at ending the warfare of empires by domestication into human rights, reciprocal trade, and sovereign borders, (d) and post 1960 experiments with immigration, that non-whites cannot be ruled into equality, governed into equality, incentivized into equality, or assimilated into equality.
Instead all attempts at domesticating non whites in large numbers have found they are destroyers of genetic, institutional, cultural capital, and the high trust norms, manners, ethics, and morals, in both display, word, and deed – that through self-domestication and genetic pacification, whites have produced, while at the same time maintaining the maximum Individual responsibility for reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means that we call freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, and the innovation adaptation evolution and progress in prosperity that results.
And outside of small numbers of the middle and upper classes who fully integrate because they are unable to form subcultures, no other people demonstrates the will or capacity to achieve that equality that whites achieve with one another. This is not an opinion it is the evidence of twenty five hundred years of experiments at equality that have always failed.
And so whites are giving up on the false promise of the Christian sedition of universalism an like the Chinese and Japanese and Koreans who are our only near peers, deciding that separation by great walls and oceans is the only means of both self defense and incentive for others to self domesticate as well.
Good intentions are irrelevant in matters of domestication.
WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN? (NOT CAUCASIAN)
What means that (a) your genetics consist of early European hunter gatherer genetics from Spain to the Urals and north to the ob river. Your traditions include our traditional pagan mythos, their evolution into greek philosophy, and their combination with and germanization of christianity, and our reformation of our philosophy and christianity into the natural sciences and natural law.
In other words, you must be Genetically, Behaviorally, and Culturally European.
RACES: GENETICS OF RACE (SUBSPECIES)
Unfortunately prior to genetics we did not understand the evolutionary adaptation of the human subspecies into what we call races. Now that we know those genetics the answer is relatively obvious. (Note: by any other criteria human races are subspecies. However, a species practices in-group selection. Humans do practice in-group selection but, humans are also the most adaptive life form, so human (or at least male) reproductive plasticity is beyond adaptive into the absurd as human males at least will attempt to mate with anything from animals to trees and everything else.)
HUMAN EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCE
1) African and the African coastal diaspora through to Australia: speciation event in the east African rift valley.
2) South Eurasian from the north west coast of Africa, to the northeast coast of India: speciation event in the then dry Persian Gulf.
… 3) Afro Asiatics (Arabs, Jews, Levantines). The semitic language is an afro asiatic langauge that evolved either in east Africa or along the red sea.
… 3) India consists of at least three migrations of which only two are commonly visible. The out of africa coastal dispersal (ASI), the early ‘iranics’ farmers, and the later ‘steppe iranics’. The Harappans were (IVC) were largely early iranic farmers. There is a small european and caucasian yamnaya contribution that accompanied the steppe herders.
… 4) Caucasians are one of the western dispersals of south eurasians. Persian Gulf -> Iran -> caucuses -> Anatolia. They fan out along the regions of water, counter-clockwise from the dry Persian gulf to Mesopotamia and clockwise from Iran to India to the Caucuses to Anatolia and into Europe. And then northward as technology allowed them to handle the cold producing the Ancestral North Eurasians.
4) East Asian from the Tibetan plateau, to the pacific isles, to the northeast tip of Siberia. Speciation event is the Tibetan Plateau (we think): Persian gulf -> Iran -> India -> Tibet -> East Asia.
… 5) Pacific islanders through to australia followed the coastal route – possibly because east africa developed the ‘modern human with modern full kit’ so to speak which included fishing, and fishing is a highly stable source of food.
… 6) Amerindians are a hybridization of ancestral north eurasians (now extinct but early west eurasians). Speciation event in beringia before moving into the americas.
7) European from the ob river, to the Urals, to the black sea, to the Spanish coast. Speciation event is along the ice. But europeans are an admixture of the spectrum of Early European Hunter Gatherers (Western, Scandinavian, Eastern), some introgression of Anatolian farmers, and strong introgression of steppe herders (eastern European can caucasian hunter gatherers.)
Dry Persian Gulf -> Anatolia -> Europe AND caucuses-> Europe. Europeans are a ‘young’ race. A product of the ice ages.
WHY? RACE, GROUP STRATEGY, CIVILIZATION, RELIGION, CULTURE
The reason these differences matter.
1) BEHAVIOR
The spread of mankind into east Africa and out of Africa followed the continuation of the single most important direction of human evolution: “neoteny”, or what we call in our livestock, “domestication syndrome”, meaning the prolongation of childhood neuralotical adaptation resulting in prolongation of cooperatively, by slowing of maturity and limiting the depth of maturity producing longer development times producing higher self regulation and agency – a trade off between aggression and domestication.
However, the result of this domestication syndrome is not only visible in rates of gestation, development, and maturity, but also in morphology and lifespan. And even more so, this domestication syndrome is visible in the rather large differences between Africa, South Eurasian, European, and east asian intelligence and rates of cultural invention, adaptation, evolution.
2) INSTITUTIONS
So it should not surprise us that Race (subspecies), Civilization, Religion, Institutions, Culture, Norms, are dramatically different between races, civilizations, and ethnicities, because institutions traditions and norms must serve the median of the distribution of the population. Because that is the majority of the population that must adhere to those institutions.
As such, east asian and European mandate for self regulation of impulsivity. And given there is a full standard deviation between europeans (100), east asians (105+) and south eurasians (low 80s), and Africans (mid 70’s), there is a demand for different degrees of normalcy despite the extremely high costs of lower capacity for self regulation and lower capacity for intellectual adaptation.
TEMPERAMENT
Temperament Traits by Region
East Asians:
Self-Regulation: Very High
Aggression: Low
Compliance with Social Norms: High
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on discipline, group harmony, and respect for authority
Europeans:
Self-Regulation: High
Aggression: Moderate
Compliance with Social Norms: Variable
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on individualism, self-expression, and personal freedom
Caucasus Populations:
Self-Regulation: Moderate
Aggression: Variable
Compliance with Social Norms: Moderate to High
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on family, community ties, and respect for tradition
South Asians (India):
Self-Regulation: Moderate
Aggression: Variable
Compliance with Social Norms: High
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on family, hierarchical social structures, and respect for tradition
South Eurasians:
North Africans:Self-Regulation: Moderate
Aggression: Variable
Compliance with Social Norms: High
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on family, community, and respect for authority
Middle Eastern Populations:
Self-Regulation: Moderate
Aggression: Variable
Compliance with Social Norms: High
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on family, honor, and social cohesion
Sub-Saharan Africans:
Self-Regulation: Low
Aggression: Variable
Compliance with Social Norms: High in some regions, Variable in others
Cultural Factors: Emphasis on community, extended family networks, and oral traditions
EQUALITY
Equality is only possible within a polity of similar genetic, institutional, and cultural composition and therefore by internal regulation while trading across borders with others for goods, services, and information.
Proximity is conflict.
Don’t Shoot The Messenger
Sorry
CD