Theme: Ethnoculture

  • 2) … tolerance within homogenous ethnocentric nations, who are willingly sacri

    2) … tolerance within homogenous ethnocentric nations, who are willingly sacrificial (kin selecting) and redistributive, and are betting on technology and the culling of population, while the west is still trying to preserve consumption when the future is one of SCARCITY.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 19:03:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322615172649943041

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322615171295174657


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    1) I don’t know if I can get @PeterZeihan to answer this (I might do a podcast or video) but I want to test an alternative hypothesis – that china perfectly well predicts the future and that they have chosen the Japanese/Russian strategy made possible by …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322615171295174657

  • 4) … europeans are fast and can leapfrog or replace, but the chinese are slow

    4) … europeans are fast and can leapfrog or replace, but the chinese are slow and steady because like the borg they conquer and assimilate. The balance is of course european truth and rule of law, and chinese ethnocentrism, determination, colonization, and forced integration.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 18:34:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322607812413923329

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322607811214348296


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    3) Because cooperation is only as valuable as it is EVOLUTIONARILY valuable. So the desire for cooperation (europeans), organization (chinese), stagnation (india), undermining (judaism), devolution (islam), means …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322607811214348296

  • 3) Because cooperation is only as valuable as it is EVOLUTIONARILY valuable. So

    3) Because cooperation is only as valuable as it is EVOLUTIONARILY valuable. So the desire for cooperation (europeans), organization (chinese), stagnation (india), undermining (judaism), devolution (islam), means …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 18:34:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322607811214348296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322607809792454657


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    2) So it appears we trade smaller brains with longer connections, and more iterations (recursions), producing agency (suppression of impulse, time for consideration), and use language for massively parallel computation for individual intelligence. This will end in a great filter.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322607809792454657

  • RACE DIFFERENCE IN EVOLUTION (YES) – OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING Europeans Are More

    RACE DIFFERENCE IN EVOLUTION (YES) – OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING

    Europeans Are More Evolved than Africans and South Eurasians and Differently Evolved from East Asians. The question of body size, brain size, energy, neoteny, and aggression that permits *distributed computation*.

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/31/race-difference-in-evolution-yes/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 16:52:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105130437231744758

  • Race Difference In Evolution (Yes)

    Race Difference In Evolution (Yes) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/31/race-difference-in-evolution-yes/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 16:51:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322581908409241608

  • Race Difference In Evolution (Yes)

    EUROPEANS ARE MORE EVOLVED THAN AFRICANS AND SOUTH EURASIANS AND DIFFERENTLY EVOLVED FROM EAST ASIANS


    The question of body size, brain size, energy, neoteny, and aggression that permits *distributed computation*.

    OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING

    Neanderthals had bigger brains than us. But not bigger than early homo sapiens. They were expanding until about 10 years ago, and have gone down by 150ccm. So we’ve decreased by two standard deviations. Our skulls are thinner, and less robust. The ratio of length to width has changed as well. (cranial index). Bigger-broader, smaller-longer). Our heads are getting smaller.

    Something like 30 animals have been domesticated, and in the process, every one of them has lost brain volume — typically a 10 to 15 percent reduction compared with their wild progenitors. Domesticated animals have more gracile builds, smaller teeth, flatter faces, a more striking range of coloration and hair types — and, in many breeds, floppy ears, and curly tails. Except for those last two traits, the domesticated breeds sound a lot like us.

    What’s caused this shrinkage is selection against aggression. (and I suggest energy availability). There have been many brain-related DNA mutations seen over the past 20 millennia.

    The more individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen. Even Darwin knew this. That’s why he recommended that animal breeders maintain large herds. You don’t have to wait so long for desirable traits to arise.

    Europeans are not as neotenically evolved as east Asians. Instead, Europeans developed middle neoteny, primarily through female selection, by selecting for light skin, light hair, gracile form – but not small body form. (although that changed in the south of Europe which did get smaller). So Europeans advertise greater neoteny without necessarily achieving east Asian levels of neotenic expression in morphology.

    Conversely, Europeans are far more neotenically evolved than Africans, more so than south Asians, and less than their East Asian equivalents the Han-Korean-Japanese.

    So yes, that’s actually the reason why we are incompatible:

    1 – Blacks, and South Asians are less evolved.
    2 – East Asians are more evolved, but paid a higher physical cost.
    3 – The open question is if we are in fact dumber than cro magnon or just less aggressive.
    4 – Or whether (as I would predict) we have sacrificed neural velocity under stress and the high energy consumption of large neural cells for lower energy consumption, smaller neural cells, and different brain chemistry.
    5 – Or whether we have traded individual intellectual capacity in small groups for distributed intellectual capacity in larger groups – which I hope isn’t the case.

    I don’t know the answer. I do know that the revolutions that came before seem to have required greater innovation than we are capable of now.

    So we should expect an increasing attack by the pseudoscientific cult of the left on neotenic evolution because it is the obvious genetic cause of human differences. And because it explains the differences in rates of gestation, maturation, and reproduction of the races, and it explains the difference in intelligence between the races, and different cultures of the races, and the different social and political demands of the races so that they can ‘mature together at the same rate’.

    Instead, we have the highest trust people in the world (Europeans) trying to host African, part African, and part Amerindian peoples which means our standard of crime and theirs are incompatible, because our standard of behavior, our standard of truthfulness, our standard of norm, tradition, law, and commons is impossible for all but a tiny fraction of them.

    This does not mean that a 120+ IQ / high conscientiousness member of a given race, that shows neotenic development (which we can easily observe in facial features and form, speech pattern, and behavior) can’t equally adapt to a european civilization. It means that only a tiny percentage of non-Europeans can do so.

    So yes ethnocentrism is necessary for ethnic Europeans – at least those of us who desire it – because devolution is the norm in post agrarian civilization.

     

     

     

     

  • Race Difference In Evolution (Yes)

    EUROPEANS ARE MORE EVOLVED THAN AFRICANS AND SOUTH EURASIANS AND DIFFERENTLY EVOLVED FROM EAST ASIANS


    The question of body size, brain size, energy, neoteny, and aggression that permits *distributed computation*.

    OUR BRAINS ARE SHRINKING

    Neanderthals had bigger brains than us. But not bigger than early homo sapiens. They were expanding until about 10 years ago, and have gone down by 150ccm. So we’ve decreased by two standard deviations. Our skulls are thinner, and less robust. The ratio of length to width has changed as well. (cranial index). Bigger-broader, smaller-longer). Our heads are getting smaller.

    Something like 30 animals have been domesticated, and in the process, every one of them has lost brain volume — typically a 10 to 15 percent reduction compared with their wild progenitors. Domesticated animals have more gracile builds, smaller teeth, flatter faces, a more striking range of coloration and hair types — and, in many breeds, floppy ears, and curly tails. Except for those last two traits, the domesticated breeds sound a lot like us.

    What’s caused this shrinkage is selection against aggression. (and I suggest energy availability). There have been many brain-related DNA mutations seen over the past 20 millennia.

    The more individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen. Even Darwin knew this. That’s why he recommended that animal breeders maintain large herds. You don’t have to wait so long for desirable traits to arise.

    Europeans are not as neotenically evolved as east Asians. Instead, Europeans developed middle neoteny, primarily through female selection, by selecting for light skin, light hair, gracile form – but not small body form. (although that changed in the south of Europe which did get smaller). So Europeans advertise greater neoteny without necessarily achieving east Asian levels of neotenic expression in morphology.

    Conversely, Europeans are far more neotenically evolved than Africans, more so than south Asians, and less than their East Asian equivalents the Han-Korean-Japanese.

    So yes, that’s actually the reason why we are incompatible:

    1 – Blacks, and South Asians are less evolved.
    2 – East Asians are more evolved, but paid a higher physical cost.
    3 – The open question is if we are in fact dumber than cro magnon or just less aggressive.
    4 – Or whether (as I would predict) we have sacrificed neural velocity under stress and the high energy consumption of large neural cells for lower energy consumption, smaller neural cells, and different brain chemistry.
    5 – Or whether we have traded individual intellectual capacity in small groups for distributed intellectual capacity in larger groups – which I hope isn’t the case.

    I don’t know the answer. I do know that the revolutions that came before seem to have required greater innovation than we are capable of now.

    So we should expect an increasing attack by the pseudoscientific cult of the left on neotenic evolution because it is the obvious genetic cause of human differences. And because it explains the differences in rates of gestation, maturation, and reproduction of the races, and it explains the difference in intelligence between the races, and different cultures of the races, and the different social and political demands of the races so that they can ‘mature together at the same rate’.

    Instead, we have the highest trust people in the world (Europeans) trying to host African, part African, and part Amerindian peoples which means our standard of crime and theirs are incompatible, because our standard of behavior, our standard of truthfulness, our standard of norm, tradition, law, and commons is impossible for all but a tiny fraction of them.

    This does not mean that a 120+ IQ / high conscientiousness member of a given race, that shows neotenic development (which we can easily observe in facial features and form, speech pattern, and behavior) can’t equally adapt to a european civilization. It means that only a tiny percentage of non-Europeans can do so.

    So yes ethnocentrism is necessary for ethnic Europeans – at least those of us who desire it – because devolution is the norm in post agrarian civilization.

     

     

     

     

  • I advocate ethnostates, and many of those states by variation in social bias, b/

    I advocate ethnostates, and many of those states by variation in social bias, b/c its the optimum solution for EVERYONE – not just b/c it forces each polity to pay the cost of self-domestication, and prevents non-domestication, but b/c of low power distance and faster adaptation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 16:17:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322573315177959424

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: 2020 has a Berlin 1932 feel: Establishment insiders are tellin

    RT @Steve_Sailer: 2020 has a Berlin 1932 feel: Establishment insiders are telling themselves that they can encourage ethnic hatred and stre…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 09:27:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322470149925097472

  • Third wave migration Amerindians forgetting they exterminated the first and seco

    Third wave migration Amerindians forgetting they exterminated the first and second waves of predecessors, caused an extinction event of megafauna, created the most bloodthirsty civ by far in history, being replaced by whites, only to lean in 2018 that they’re half white. (ANE)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 01:16:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322346668914855936

    Reply addressees: @OppressGovt @simaleerbg @Anarchohoodism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321865982474858496