Theme: Ethnoculture

DEBATE ME IF YOU DARE

(a) “I was there and involved” in the 70’s when intellectual conservatives adopted the strategy of ‘letting the state suicide’ like the Soviets were. By the late 50’s marxism was dead. But state socialism took longer. So by the 70’s the soviets were showing indications of economic and political failure. This is how we knew the star wars program and economic sanctions would bring about the fall. It did.

(b) The strategy of ‘let the state fail’ is in fact a european ‘market’ strategy of ‘pay your own way and bear your own consequences’. And it absolutely positively would have worked without vast immigration. The ratio of WHITE underclass is small enough to be carried by the middle-class productive majority. But the left succeeded in convincing the ‘moral’ population to end eugenic immigration while promising the people it would not lead to unregulated underclass expansion. It was, like all false promises of the left, a lie. The immigration act allowed third world people who have failed to demonstrate that they are not UNFIT for participation in northern european civilization: full integration into delayed marriage, household before reproduction, self-sufficiency, market meritocracy, suppression of expression in the commons, rule of law of self-determination by individual sovereignty and reciprocity. “Whiteness” means “Self-determination so that the proceeds of the state are devoted to the production of capitalizing commons, not the preservation of underclass reproduction”. This is why east Asia and Europe succeeded and all other civilizations failed -in particular, Islam which not only is the most dysgenic, but also the most closed to adaptation by forced ignorance.

(c) You see, because european success over the rest is largely due to self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity limiting all of our society to ‘markets in everything’ (including market government we call democracy. The result: EUGENIC REPRODUCTION. This is the reason for east Asian and northern european success over the civilizations that stagnated or declined. Truth before face, commons before self, reproduction by merit, suppression of reproduction and punishment by poverty if not. (d) People from religiously dominant cultures are so because they’re tribal and low trust not homogenous – they stagnate and decline.  People from state cultures like the Chinese are homogeneous and medium trust and they progress very slowly.  And people from market cultures are ethnocentric and tolerant for commercial purposes and they progress very quickly. So you might see the states as the Marxist ‘revisionist history’ as like religion a universal. But it isn’t. It’s just the continuation of 1000 years of the holy roman empire of Germany, 1000 years of Mediterranean empirical history, and 1000 years of european steppe heder conquest of agrarian europe. and 1000 years of the development of steppe herder civilization in Poland and Ukraine. (e) Temperament increases in non-aggression in the north, probably peaking in ancestral North Eurasians, then further domesticated under european cultural eugenics, accelerating in 700ad by Manorialism and in 1200 by aggressive hanging, and aggression works in the opposite direction to aggression at the equator, for well-understood reasons that are evident in morphology. But most importantly in the “evil 80s’ where people are aggressive and sufficient intelligence to scheme, but not to invent. Hence european knights teaching Muslims the new plow. Subsaharan Africans are more aggressive and impulsive but they are ‘below the evil 80’s’ that constitute much of south Asia (and the Muslim world). So, of course, we see deterministic behavior in the Muslim world. The Indians had interestingly solved the problem with castes, where the Islamists had solved it by making everyone underclass equals.  The Chinese created intellectual castes by peasants, soldiery, bureaucracy, and aristocracy. The Europeans solved it by the slave, serf, freeman, citizen, sovereignty hierarchy, and competency markets. but only some of these strategies worked. (e) So, while the Chinese live in 105+ IQ and don’t seem to pay the ‘rural iq tax so to speak’, and they’re dropping right now because all advanced countries lose IQ with ‘redistribution’. As recently as 1860 English lived in 112 IQ populations, Northern European in 100+ populations, and have expanded underclass reproduction and immigration taking us to 100 and now American to 97, which is close to the 95 that causes second world country status; southwest Asian (Muslim) are in sub-85 IQ populations, and South Asia (India) closer to 80. and Africa in the 70’s,  now these are meaningful numbers because they determine RATES OF COGNITIVE ADAPTABILITY that we, unfortunately, call ‘intelligence’.  What they mean is that as an economic division of labor increases,  technology increases, and prosperity increases, the demand for adaptability in time increases.  As such the dividends of the anglo-germanic legal, financial, commercial, industrial, scientific, and technological revolutions are almost exhausted by the distribution of those skills around the globe.  And so Europeans advantage in quality of life is determined entirely by genetic composition and preservation of our high trust, markets-in-everything civilization so that we produce just enough surplus to maintain our ‘lower classes’ (10%). 

(f) So when you say progress you mean “DECLINE” by redistribution of both investment in capitalizing commons and in eugenic reproduction from people who CAN create and compete in an advanced, high trust, evolutionary (meritocratic) economy, to the vast majority of the world that cannnot. Because IQ isn’t meaningless, and culture isn’t meaningless, and norms, traditions, habits, mythologues and even methods of argument aren’t meaningless.

(g) So whites have two choices. Civil war and aggression, or letting what happened to china and the soviet union happen here, and let ethnocentrism follow its historical bloody course. What we have chosen so far is to ‘let you fail’ isolate you in cities, and then return to our traditional group strategy while you turn them into “Shitholes” like you have everywhere else. Because your understanding of good, right, and moral is in fact ‘wrong’ – it’s false, unscientific, and it’s obviously so.  In fact, the purpose of most religions is to escape that fact. There are formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws in this universe and Europeans and Europeans alone have almost exclusively discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and benefitted from each of them.  And we pay only one cost to do so:  Market meritocracy that suppresses the reproduction of those who are not self-sufficient.

It’s just physics. WHITENESS = A CIVILIZATION ORDER THAT EVOLVES FASTEST AND MOST PROFITABLY BY DISCOVERY, ADAPTATION TO, AND APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE. And if you can’t do that you’re unfit for that civilization. And the truth is, you’re unfit for the planet. Because you’re unfit for the universe. Period. How is that for uncomfortable truth?

DEBATE ME IF YOU DARE

(a) “I was there and involved” in the 70’s when intellectual conservatives adopted the strategy of ‘letting the state suicide’ like the Soviets were. By the late 50’s marxism was dead. But state socialism took longer. So by the 70’s the soviets were showing indications of economic and political failure. This is how we knew the star wars program and economic sanctions would bring about the fall. It did.

(b) The strategy of ‘let the state fail’ is in fact a european ‘market’ strategy of ‘pay your own way and bear your own consequences’. And it absolutely positively would have worked without vast immigration. The ratio of WHITE underclass is small enough to be carried by the middle-class productive majority. But the left succeeded in convincing the ‘moral’ population to end eugenic immigration while promising the people it would not lead to unregulated underclass expansion. It was, like all false promises of the left, a lie. The immigration act allowed third world people who have failed to demonstrate that they are not UNFIT for participation in northern european civilization: full integration into delayed marriage, household before reproduction, self-sufficiency, market meritocracy, suppression of expression in the commons, rule of law of self-determination by individual sovereignty and reciprocity. “Whiteness” means “Self-determination so that the proceeds of the state are devoted to the production of capitalizing commons, not the preservation of underclass reproduction”. This is why east Asia and Europe succeeded and all other civilizations failed -in particular, Islam which not only is the most dysgenic, but also the most closed to adaptation by forced ignorance.

(c) You see, because european success over the rest is largely due to self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity limiting all of our society to ‘markets in everything’ (including market government we call democracy. The result: EUGENIC REPRODUCTION. This is the reason for east Asian and northern european success over the civilizations that stagnated or declined. Truth before face, commons before self, reproduction by merit, suppression of reproduction and punishment by poverty if not. (d) People from religiously dominant cultures are so because they’re tribal and low trust not homogenous – they stagnate and decline.  People from state cultures like the Chinese are homogeneous and medium trust and they progress very slowly.  And people from market cultures are ethnocentric and tolerant for commercial purposes and they progress very quickly. So you might see the states as the Marxist ‘revisionist history’ as like religion a universal. But it isn’t. It’s just the continuation of 1000 years of the holy roman empire of Germany, 1000 years of Mediterranean empirical history, and 1000 years of european steppe heder conquest of agrarian europe. and 1000 years of the development of steppe herder civilization in Poland and Ukraine. (e) Temperament increases in non-aggression in the north, probably peaking in ancestral North Eurasians, then further domesticated under european cultural eugenics, accelerating in 700ad by Manorialism and in 1200 by aggressive hanging, and aggression works in the opposite direction to aggression at the equator, for well-understood reasons that are evident in morphology. But most importantly in the “evil 80s’ where people are aggressive and sufficient intelligence to scheme, but not to invent. Hence european knights teaching Muslims the new plow. Subsaharan Africans are more aggressive and impulsive but they are ‘below the evil 80’s’ that constitute much of south Asia (and the Muslim world). So, of course, we see deterministic behavior in the Muslim world. The Indians had interestingly solved the problem with castes, where the Islamists had solved it by making everyone underclass equals.  The Chinese created intellectual castes by peasants, soldiery, bureaucracy, and aristocracy. The Europeans solved it by the slave, serf, freeman, citizen, sovereignty hierarchy, and competency markets. but only some of these strategies worked. (e) So, while the Chinese live in 105+ IQ and don’t seem to pay the ‘rural iq tax so to speak’, and they’re dropping right now because all advanced countries lose IQ with ‘redistribution’. As recently as 1860 English lived in 112 IQ populations, Northern European in 100+ populations, and have expanded underclass reproduction and immigration taking us to 100 and now American to 97, which is close to the 95 that causes second world country status; southwest Asian (Muslim) are in sub-85 IQ populations, and South Asia (India) closer to 80. and Africa in the 70’s,  now these are meaningful numbers because they determine RATES OF COGNITIVE ADAPTABILITY that we, unfortunately, call ‘intelligence’.  What they mean is that as an economic division of labor increases,  technology increases, and prosperity increases, the demand for adaptability in time increases.  As such the dividends of the anglo-germanic legal, financial, commercial, industrial, scientific, and technological revolutions are almost exhausted by the distribution of those skills around the globe.  And so Europeans advantage in quality of life is determined entirely by genetic composition and preservation of our high trust, markets-in-everything civilization so that we produce just enough surplus to maintain our ‘lower classes’ (10%). 

(f) So when you say progress you mean “DECLINE” by redistribution of both investment in capitalizing commons and in eugenic reproduction from people who CAN create and compete in an advanced, high trust, evolutionary (meritocratic) economy, to the vast majority of the world that cannnot. Because IQ isn’t meaningless, and culture isn’t meaningless, and norms, traditions, habits, mythologues and even methods of argument aren’t meaningless.

(g) So whites have two choices. Civil war and aggression, or letting what happened to china and the soviet union happen here, and let ethnocentrism follow its historical bloody course. What we have chosen so far is to ‘let you fail’ isolate you in cities, and then return to our traditional group strategy while you turn them into “Shitholes” like you have everywhere else. Because your understanding of good, right, and moral is in fact ‘wrong’ – it’s false, unscientific, and it’s obviously so.  In fact, the purpose of most religions is to escape that fact. There are formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws in this universe and Europeans and Europeans alone have almost exclusively discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and benefitted from each of them.  And we pay only one cost to do so:  Market meritocracy that suppresses the reproduction of those who are not self-sufficient.

It’s just physics. WHITENESS = A CIVILIZATION ORDER THAT EVOLVES FASTEST AND MOST PROFITABLY BY DISCOVERY, ADAPTATION TO, AND APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE. And if you can’t do that you’re unfit for that civilization. And the truth is, you’re unfit for the planet. Because you’re unfit for the universe. Period. How is that for uncomfortable truth?