RT @EPoe187: The notion that people would be advocating for slavery if we talked honestly about group differences is ludicrous. What is mor…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 23:12:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813713526814306607
–“The civilization you described ended up in this multi ethnic state.”–
It ended up as such in the USA because the postwar left was able to capture enough of the academy and media during the late fifties through early seventies, to convince enough, people, largely women, and largely those who had newly risen out of the proletariat, that a utopia could be brought into being. And they were only legally able to do so by lawfare and riots and taking over campuses and bombings in concert with the agony of the civil war. If not for women voters it wouldn’t have happened.
It ended up as such in europe as a postwar revolt against the nazis and most importantly advanced by the combination of the french desire to rule europe and the jewish postwar devotion to the cause.
both of these periods have demonstrated the failure of diversity just as the marxist class revolt failed in the past.
My(our) work seeks to plug holes in the US, then the Anglosphere, then the european constitutions, such that this process can be both reversed and prevented from reoccurrence.
Reply addressees: @3NaHalfBrownMen @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 21:57:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813694512839245824
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813690569828516176
–“The Genie is out of the bottle.”–
That’s an opinion, one that allows you the least effort, and presumes voting has any say in the matter. Assimilation does not happen except with near neighbors.
Two intentional groups intentionally seek NOT to assimilate. one heterogenous group is sufficiently large in certain regions that they have no incentive to. One group seeks assimilation but is not capable of equal economic productivity and is a mandatory lower class. The other group has given up on assimilation and has already formed a permanent underclass.
If, you live under the illusions that people are equal, or that groups are equal, or have the capacity to be, or that they can continue integration into the most psychologically and emotionally demanding civilization, and that developed civilizations and countries can tolerate heterogeneity and still maintain their quality of life, or that heterogeneous populations can preserve participatory government and rule of law, they you don’t know the science, only christian dogma and marxist sedition. 🙁
Reply addressees: @3NaHalfBrownMen @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 21:33:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813688445434204160
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813604185503592812
THIS IS WHY AN ETHNICALLY HOMOGENEOUS POLITY IS NECESSARY FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
If the people are to be sovereign it must be possible to govern by the production of consensus by concurrency between classes and regions. And the populations must be capable of comprehension… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1812996191556174113
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 23:49:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812997873421726058
RT @curtdoolittle: @jeffreyatucker Because libertarianism (as you mean it) is the group evolutionary strategy of the shtetl, ghetto, pale,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 17:02:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812895586959466921
BTW: women are just as bad as non-white men.
AFAIK, the only net contributors to the economy are white males over 35.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 01:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812654547086479817
Reply addressees: @Draconaissance @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812646440335970522
POSITIVE ETHNONATIONALISM NOT NEGATIVE RACISM
Assertion: -“Hence there is no future without everyone getting seriously racist.”– D
Well I wouldn’t recommend Rudyard touch this conversation or any like it. That’s not his job, and we need him to continue his good works within the limits of his job.
But that said, to address your point, instead of criticizing others, I would switch from the negativa to the positiva frame, by saying ethno-nationlism is necessary for the survival of a people who have cultural, civilizational, and geographic advantages, largely because of accumulated genetic and cultural advantages, and that we’ve ended the experiment with globalization by reversing the european construction of nationalism and federation as the solution to the end of empires.
All groups will benefit from ethnonationalism. All of them. It will take time for some peoples to evolve institutions suitable for their demographic distributions, but while we are incompatible within the same polity because of our different demands for norms and institutions, we are compatible by trade – eternally.
In other words, the optimum polities are always and everywhere, small, ethnically homogenous nation state organized into federations for defense, insurance against catastrophe, combined investment, and advantages in trade.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @Draconaissance @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 01:03:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812654145364471808
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812646440335970522
I used both to suggest a hierarchy of civic, then ethno, but in ethnically homogenous nation states the terms are synonymous.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-14 17:21:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812538039303864595
Reply addressees: @RicardoASan2000 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812536813330071841
Ethnonationalism and Civic Nationalism are the only alternatives to supernatural religions.
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-14 16:34:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812526069708198398
@whatifalthist and followers:
I follow you (RL) but not so much comments directed at you. I had a chance to browse through a wide range of comments here and YT and given we’re pretty close friends, I’m kind of set off by some of the criticisms – not of your work (which is pretty hard to criticize), but instead of you personally.
Why the heck to people think you’re autistic or a nerd? Is it just a vast difference in your maturity for your age, while you still maintain the humor of your youth? (I suspect it’s something like that) Intellectuals aren’t that nerdy. You certainly aren’t. You’re exceptionally graceful in social conditions. Well mannered. A great conversationalist and good leader even if you’d prefer to preserve your think time rather than take responsibility for herding cats. That doesn’t mean you’re going to find stimulation in ‘normie’ interests. I mean, the swords thing? How many of us went through that phase but didn’t have the money to buy them? I don’t know what else could stick out.
And what is this about being autistic? Well, you know, as someone very low on the aspergers spectrum myself, autism is just the extreme male systematizing brain. You’re very male brained in that sense. Are they confusing your fascination for accumulating wisdom with autism? You don’t demonstrate any of the autistic traits of lack of capacity for empathic understanding – just the opposite.
Is it because you’re so concerned for the men of your generation (because you know what happens when they reach critical mass) that they think you’re projecting?
And what is it with these people claiming your an incel? WTH? I guess you don’t talk about the women you’re dating or courting? And I can attest to the hotness of at least the one I met and the few others I know of. So where is this nonsense coming from?
Is it a class thing? You probably consider yourself middle or upper middle class but you are from a background of academic parenting.
I mean, exceptional people are often idiosyncratic or eccentric, (I’m certainly eccentric) and maybe you have a little of that, but otherwise you’re just normal from my perspective other than you’re extremely intelligent, studied, mature, wise, and thoughtful for your age.
Is it the dissonance between your age, your generation, your sense of humor, and what you study and talk about? (Again, I think that might be it).
I’m probably asking these questions rhetorically, because they’re really directed at your followers.
How can you produce that much content and do so with so much personal openness, and yet some people understand you so poorly? Is it something as foolish as self image protection by those who can’t understand your work?
Someone please explain this to me?
Because the guy I know is just a very smart normie who has some long tail playfulness of youth at one and and wisdom of scholars three (four?) times his age on the other.
Thanks
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 18:14:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811101681456926721