Its bad enough that the Indians try to concoct this nonsense. Now east asians are trying the same?
There was gene flow both directions. There is no other ‘implication’.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-30 16:43:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2006043573771460616
RK: High trust polities that are geographically and demographically insulated from cross-cultural (norms, traditions, institutions, myths) and cross demographic (ability) populations tend to extrapolate their behavior onto others. It’s the borderland countries that have the realistic understanding of the differences between groups. Add christian universalist virtue signaling, and compound it with wealth advantage virtue signaling and you have a population vulnerable to the falsification of those false premises – at dramatic and often devastating expense.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-30 04:40:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2005861403635421312
We’ll it’s not accurate for you. For the same reason racism isn’t interpersonally rational – only politically. Because while we can judge a group by the properties of it’s individuals – hence the enduring truth of stereotypes – we cannot judge an individual by the properties of the group because we all exist in a complex set of distributions within each group.
Thus all interpersonal behavior should be on the evidence of the individual, and all political behavior on the evidence of the group.
-hugs 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 18:05:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004614509265387524
True. Look at the origins of the lawfare in the USA.
If you can stomach the volume of detail in the impact of Jewish intellectuals read Kevin Macdonald’s series including the People Who Shall Dwell Alone, and the heavily suppressed Culture of Critique.
If you want an unbiased view read Stephen Hicks’ Explaining Postmodernism.
If you want to higher level view read Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization.
If you want world context, read Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations and our present return to it’s dominance.
My work on group evolutionary strategies and their cognitive and biological origins is almost ready for publication, but much of my thinking is publicly available.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-26 01:10:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2004359186377748725
NOTE FOR ALL: There is a relationship between culture and genome that is self-reinforcing, but mostly in the direction of neotenic evolution (domestication syndrome). So the [R1b > R1a > I] cline have been co-evolving for millennia – at least since the end of the ice age.
We might argue that genome is just a proxy for civilization because civilizations reflect the demands of their genetic distributions, and the primary axis of genetic distribution in both sexual rate and depth of maturity, sexual dimorphism, temperament (personality) and intelligence.
But all that would mean is that it’s the distribution of the population under that culture evolved under that genome evolved under that degree of neotenic evolution, made possible by isolation and sub-speciation.
This is the correct explanation of the correlation of integration possibility rather than purely attributing it to genetics.
When we account for the entire sequence we see causal clarity and ends the criticism of reliance on genetic determinism.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 22:20:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003953988144930884
(Worth The Watch)
BARRY DOING HER BEST JOB OF EXPLAINING THE RUSSIAN MIND.
It’s sad. I love them. But they are still serfs. Feudal. And as a low trust polity that never obtained middle class majority and the resulting rule of law, they cannot imagine they can be self organizing and a market economy that would be the envy of the continent if they would just work at it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-24 01:50:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003644492898017395
Not sure where you’re getting that from. Semitic ethics are low trust ethics. (European: truth before face, East Asian: Face before truth, Semitic: facelessness – it’s still admirable to ‘get away with’ something. ‘The ethics of the bazaar.’) Africa never progressed until christianity beyond the ethics of the four family types so it’s not easy to discuss their ethics. Christianity was a reform using theology (semitic mythicism) as a means of making semitic peoples capable of cooperation sufficient to resist the european-persian (indo european) superiors. Talmudic Judaism was a revolt that attempted to adopt western rule of law in semitic terms. Islam was a revolt against the corruption of their tribal elders during the period where europe and persia had exhausted themselves. Fundamentalist islam was a revolt against the introduction of european thought into semitic civilization. The reasons for these revolts are largely understood as natural conflicts between populations with vastly different intelligence, institutions, and trust for ancestral reasons. Unfortunately, when the middle east converted to christianity it made progress, but the barbarism of islam – the most backward people in the region – resulted in the most digressive group strategy on earth – which is why islamic cultures is the last to adapt to modernity.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 21:30:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001766966202359952
Approximate IQ Ranges by Sub-Population (Race and Hybrids)
Old African (55-65)> New African (68-72) > Afro-Asiatic (78) > India (76-82) > Pacific Islands (78) > Central Asian (82-88) > European (98-99) > East Asian (104-106)
a) norms and institutions must suit the abilities of the populations, which is largely reflected in competency and trust.
b) any variation by more than 1/2 standard deviation (7 pts) generates conflict in norms and institutions, but more so in economic capacity as technologies increase.
c) Those people with IQ under 92 in today’s world are effectively dead weight to harmful in modern european and east asian economies.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 21:20:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001764457236828183
You have beliefs and motivated reasoning. I have science and empirical reasoning.
Stereotypes are accurate predictors of behavior. This means groups insure against those negative behaviors.
There is no value in bearing costs of opportunity in cooperation vs the risk of conflict or loss in cooperation. Your insinuation is that people are too dumb or ignorant to make that assessment when the first principle of all sentient action is the greatest return in the shortest time, at the last cost, and lowest risk, with the greatest certainty, in competition with all other opportunities at the moment.
People make rational judgements – always – given the information available to them.
Why risk any interaction with a population whose behavior and criminality is six times worse than your own people?
IT’s a bad investment. WE have only so many investments to make.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 20:59:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001759334452334987
Stereotypes are endemic throughout all recorded history, and are a necessary property of predictive discrimination. And it’s empirical since it must survive daily observation at population scale. This is why stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science. The problem becomes when, not predicting probability of group or individual behavior, but when attempting to cooperate with an individual under the presumption. In other words, stereotypes are an accurate description of a class of people, but a class of people consists of a distribution, and as such we can judge a class by the properties of its individuals but cannot judge an individual by the properties of their class.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-18 20:44:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001755441987232166