Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 03:30:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635845831222784000
Reply addressees: @GaelicReaction
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635844069069934592
Theme: Ethnoculture
-
There are only two groups that produce systemic thought leadership in the world,
There are only two groups that produce systemic thought leadership in the world, and it.s easy to argue that it’s only European and european jews. The entire marxist corpus comes from jewish authors except for I think two, one Brazilian catholic and one Italan catholic hunchback.… https://t.co/mbT6QVtCgq
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635776208683008001
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635719064193490944
-
Correct. There are two cognitive elites producing systematic thought projects: E
Correct. There are two cognitive elites producing systematic thought projects: Europeans for the masculine and Jewish for the feminine. It’s rather fascinating how accurately these two groups of people reflect the genetic and biological biases of the different sexes, rather than…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:32:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635771020047970306
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635737307209760787
-
Of course. See the reply I just posted. Interesting. I’m from the eenglish equiv
Of course. See the reply I just posted.
Interesting.
I’m from the eenglish equivalent.
We have 1 point higher IQ in our class than ashkenazi
But ashkenazi have 1.5 points in wider distribution.
And that distribution results in verbal acuity rather than systemizing.
There are also more askenazi than my class of anglos (Anglicans)
So what we see is what you’d expect: ashkenazi replacement of anglos in credentialism (adademy) and consistent preservation of anglos in military and industry.
Fascinating.Reply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:06:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635704082370265091
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703072839041040
-
Of course. See the reply I just posted. Interesting. I’m from the eenglish equiv
Of course. See the reply I just posted.
Interesting.
I’m from the eenglish equivalent.
We have 1 point higher IQ in our class than ashkenazi
But ashkenazi have 1.5 points in wider distribution.
And that distribution results in verbal acuity rather than systemizing.
There are also more askenazi than my class of anglos (Anglicans)
So what we see is what you’d expect: ashkenazi replacement of anglos in credentialism (adademy) and consistent preservation of anglos in military and industry.
Fascinating.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:06:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635704082525454351
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703072839041040
-
WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex
WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.
Cheers
Curt DoolittleReply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438385266722
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448
-
WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS? Jewish culture originated early and we’re not ex
WHY ASHKENAZI CULTURE AND BIAS?
Jewish culture originated early and we’re not exactly sure why but they were outcasts from the better coastal land. The egyptians do what all empires do and select a group of outcasts who have no loyalties to the locals, to administer them, and so taught the jews literacy, etc. The rewards were instant and profound. Instead of a pirestly cast that was entirely dependent on taxations, the jwes formed a clerical class that was dependen on TRANSACTIONS. The nepotistic value of this process was so profound that it was continually reinforced by every possible condition. Over time this combination caused heavy selection pressure for cognitively female behavior (empathizing (predicting minds), words, seduction (baiting into hazard), special pleading and pretense of innocence, that has only become self reinforcing over time, especially by redistribution of reproduction to rabbis. Given that Ashkenazim are an admixture of jewish males and european (largely italian) females, and that european IQ is a lot higher than MENA, it would be logical that it would only amplify the reproductive strategy. We are within perhaps 20 years or less of fully explaining it genetically. But in the aggregate of behavior even in outbread ashkenazim it’s universal. Just as the ‘autistic’ tendence of male europeans for the opposite reason: upward redistribution to the middle and upper classes under aristocracy and later manorialism. personaly I find this whole subject fascinating. But at least it’s fixable with minor tweaks to our law to prohibit the spectrum of irresponsibiilty, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 18:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635703438729261057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635700120720232448
-
FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN (science, testimony,
FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN
(science, testimony, sovereignty, and reciprocity are male concepts.)
Women are just as aggressive and warlike as men, they just express aggression and war differently from men: by parasitism, special pleading, relativism, undermining, social construction, seduction (baiting into hazard), sedition, treason.
So if we study male and female differences we observe that the Jews conduct warfare as do women. Why? Weakness, empathizing, verbal acuity: devotion, nepotism, seduction (baiting into hazard), double standards, pilpul(sophistry) and critique(undermining), social construction, sedition, and treason.
Why? I wont’ get into this in detail but there are pretty large differences between the races in subtle expression. And ingroup traditions accelerate group selection.
So to some degree (and once you see it you can’t unsee it) the semitic peoples as a trend, jews in general somewhat, and the ashkenazi in particular have either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism.
We can see this in race differences in expression of mental illness and antisocial behavior, as well as means of expression (langauge) means of argument (aggression), occupational selection (talking, ‘shopping’, ‘hazarding’), family organization, political affiliation, and religious or cultural literature (critique).
So, personally I find it fascinating. And professionaly I find it allowed me to solve most of our problems by minor reform to the law, that prohibit female antisocial to warfare behavire, as thoroughly as male antisocial to warfare behavior.
And you know what? That let me understand what’s wrong with the world regardless of sex. Lots of baiting into hazard – everywhere.
Cheers
Curt DoolittleReply addressees: @superkanga @KiwiBreeder
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:30:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635694879543111680
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635691424258699281
-
FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN (science, testimony,
FEMALE AND JEWISH METHODS OF THINKING VS MALE AND EUROPEAN
(science, testimony, sovereignty, and reciprocity are male concepts.)
Women are just as aggressive and warlike as men, they just express aggression and war differently from men: by parasitism, special pleading, relativism, undermining, social construction, seduction (baiting into hazard), sedition, treason.
So if we study male and female differences we observe that the Jews conduct warfare as do women. Why? Weakness, empathizing, verbal acuity: devotion, nepotism, seduction (baiting into hazard), double standards, pilpul(sophistry) and critique(undermining), social construction, sedition, and treason.
Why? I wont’ get into this in detail but there are pretty large differences between the races in subtle expression. And ingroup traditions accelerate group selection.
So to some degree (and once you see it you can’t unsee it) the semitic peoples as a trend, jews in general somewhat, and the ashkenazi in particular have either narrowed or reversed cognitive sexual dimorphism.
We can see this in race differences in expression of mental illness and antisocial behavior, as well as means of expression (langauge) means of argument (aggression), occupational selection (talking, ‘shopping’, ‘hazarding’), family organization, political affiliation, and religious or cultural literature (critique).
So, personally I find it fascinating. And professionaly I find it allowed me to solve most of our problems by minor reform to the law, that prohibit female antisocial to warfare behavire, as thoroughly as male antisocial to warfare behavior.
And you know what? That let me understand what’s wrong with the world regardless of sex. Lots of baiting into hazard – everywhere.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 17:30:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635694879706689548
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635691424258699281
-
Doesn’t appear so. Appears it’s all across the european distribution
Doesn’t appear so. Appears it’s all across the european distribution.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 02:09:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635463094729076739
Reply addressees: @BlakeAn77455669
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635462275556429824