RT @dr_duchesne: In 2012, I concluded the great replacement was real and that universities, including the one where I taught, were fosterin…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-13 00:10:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922081879877882314
I’m pretty libertarian and presume optimistically about everyone. So if I’m losing my empathy for other groups, what are the majority doing? https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1922066445787074768
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-13 00:03:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922080113954296051
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1922066445787074768
RT @EndWokeness: BREAKING: First group of white refugees fleeing persecution (South Africa) have arrived in the United States https://t.co/…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-12 20:06:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922020562198495726
(From Elsewhere)
RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face Before Truth” and Outright Lying.
The Chinese are nothing like Westerners. They do not seek win-win but authoritarianism. They use “Face before Truth”, they use “Delay and Deceive”, the do not seek partnership they seek rule in the interest of their ruling class regardless of the consequence to their people or to others. They never adhere to agreement or contract by using delay and deceive.
As a rational pragmatism, it is merely better to Talk vs War. However, we are all waiting to determine who will blink first – the chinese economy, the Chinese CCP, or Trump and the Trump administration. So basically, we will have until at least next spring before anyone ‘blinks.
Most of the outcome is predicated on how fast the Trump administration can push through both domestic and international agenda, so that the US Economy has a future independent of China, or whether the rate and severity of the decline in the Chinese economy causes a threat to the stability of the CCP necessitating their compromise.
IMO war is their best option but it only will accelerate the decline of the CCP. This leader, another chinese “Bad Emperor” problem (Look it up) could have kept on building their commercial dominance and the rest of the world would have been just as happy as we were before “Bad Emperor Xi”. But between the Taiwan issue, the India issue, the Russia Issue, the North Korea issue, the CCP is just another well funded state terrorist organization.
The USA makes plenty of mistakes but they want all people to have sovereignty within their borders, human rights for all, and free trade for all. And Americans have spent too much blood and treasure dragging mankind out of its historical warfare into the Pax Americana to have their investments seized and abused by yet another set of authoritarian terrorists trying to set the world backward by two centuries.
CD
#TradeWar
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 22:43:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921697658105962662
(From Elsewhere)
RE: US China Trade Negotiations as “Delay and Deceive”, “Face Before Truth” and Outright Lying.
The Chinese are nothing like Westerners. They do not seek win-win but authoritarianism. They use “Face before Truth”, they use “Delay and Deceive”, the do not seek partnership they seek rule in the interest of their ruling class regardless of the consequence to their people or to others. They never adhere to agreement or contract by using delay and deceive.
As a rational pragmatism, it is merely better to Talk vs War. However, we are all waiting to determine who will blink first – the chinese economy, the Chinese CCP, or Trump and the Trump administration. So basically, we will have until at least next spring before anyone ‘blinks.
Most of the outcome is predicated on how fast the Trump administration can push through both domestic and international agenda, so that the US Economy has a future independent of China, or whether the rate and severity of the decline in the Chinese economy causes a threat to the stability of the CCP necessitating their compromise.
IMO war is their best option but it only will accelerate the decline of the CCP. This leader, another chinese “Bad Emperor” problem (Look it up) could have kept on building their commercial dominance and the rest of the world would have been just as happy as we were before “Bad Emperor Xi”. But between the Taiwan issue, the India issue, the Russia Issue, the North Korea issue, the CCP is just another well funded state terrorist organization.
The USA makes plenty of mistakes but they want all people to have sovereignty within their borders, human rights for all, and free trade for all. And Americans have spent too much blood and treasure dragging mankind out of its historical warfare into the Pax Americana to have their investments seized and abused by yet another set of authoritarian terrorists trying to set the world backward by two centuries.
CD
#TradeWar
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-11 22:43:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921697657845899264
–Q:”How come in the early modern or medieval period the Muslims routinely outcompeted the Hindus in most fields whether militarily, conquering most of India, culturally or economically. When the British conquered India they preferred working with Muslims, seeing them as more advanced.”–@whatifalthist
Answer: (Despite I assume you know this) 😉
–“Post-1947, India’s stable democracy, economic reforms, and investment in education enabled it to outpace Pakistan, which faced political instability, limited industrialization, and security challenges.”–
This same argument applies to almost everything in the muslim world after the Turk’s conquest of Byzantium. Islamic civ started it’s decline in the 10th century with it’s switch to fundamentalism. Even though, Islamic civ was sufficiently organized for small organizations and their trade even over distances, and for agrarian production. And their use of gunpowder put the indians at a disadvantage. But, the absence of (rejection of) literacy, the low trust society, the inheritance laws, and the inability to form corporations – or any organization of scale – was out competed by the indians in no small part because as subject of british rule they inherited and applied much more advanced systems of government which made the opposite possible, and combined it with slow but successful expansion of education even despite the IQ distribution from northwest to southeast.
Islam is as cognitively and political deleterious as the pseudoscientific religion of the marxist socialist sequence is economically deleterious.
In fact, while Iran, Russia, and china continue to try to preserve the prewar centralization of power and government as a profit center for leading families, the only remaining threat to the world is Islam. The fact that we don’t admit it and only seek to outlast it under the presumption that it will reform is merely a convenience not a conviction.
CD
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-10 02:54:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921036057610776576
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920847026629058878
IN REPLY TO:
@whatifalthist
How come in the early modern or medieval period the Muslims routinely outcompeted the Hindus in most fields whether militarily, conquering most of India, culturally or economically. When the British conquered India they preferred working with Muslims, seeing them as more advanced. It was widely assumed at the time of independence that Pakistan would outpace India but the exact opposite has happened. Now since 1947 the Hindus have outpaced the Muslims of the subcontinent in nearly everything. Why did this happen?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920847026629058878
WHO IS THE SUPERSTITIOUS POPULATION?
To: Carl Benjamin (@Sargon_of_Akkad)
RE: Excellent piece: “How do you de-tribalize people”
https://t.co/MIF03Dz9Od
Carl;
I haven’t been on your show yet, and I have no idea if anyone’s proposed it. I might have in the past.
But science is science whether we like it or not, and humans are ‘trainable’ into high trust norms to very different degrees. So, we can’t circumvent the problem of race, civilization, culture, class, and sex differences because norms, traditions, values institutions, whether civil, legal, political, religious evolved to suit the demographic distribution of the populations.
The Left’s attempt to claim that differences between populations are marginally indifferent is false by all the evidence collected. We ended class differences in the 80s. We ended the sex differences argument by 2012, we ended the race argument by 2017, and like the postwar order, the liberal and neoliberal order, and the marxist-leninist sequence (class to relativism to sex to race) ending in Woke, we are slowly observing the collapse of the ideologies and sophistries, lies and frauds that constitute the majority of political and economic discourse of the late 19th, entirety of the 20th and first quarter of the 21st century.
Population differences appear significant in neotenic development (domestication syndrome), significant in the resulting median IQ, and somewhat significant in the resulting impulse regulation, and significant enough when in numbers in our personality variations, and as a result radically different in criminality and capacity for self sufficiency and self regulation and conformity in an advanced, high trust society.
We Westerners are ‘W.E.I.R.D’ – and as such we assume the rest of the world is equally adaptable to a high trust AND high responsibility society capable of manufacturing both discount-producing commons, and extraordinary innovation. It doesn’t mean everyone else did.
While 100 or so today, according to Lynn, the English probably had a 115 average IQ in the late 1700s. Meaning only 1/4 of the population was below 105, and only .04% was below 90. Meaning only something in single digit percentages of the population was at middle eastern levels of median IQ.
Likewise, middle eastern populations live with an average IQ of 84. And most of the world is in the low 80s or lower. Though race-hybridization produced a spectrum in the 90s. Under 10% of the middle east is over 105, and only 2% have an IQ high enough for college admissions.
So why do we assume that the norms traditions values institutions (religions, governments, laws) necessary for a 100IQ median population that’s highly neotenous, low on impulsivity, highly self regulatory, with the most advanced institutions would be even POSSIBLE for people with an average of 84IQ, much lower neoteny, higher impulsivity, who demand external regulation whether superstitious, ritualistic, familial, social, or environmental can integrate?
I mean, who is the superstitious population? The one with a tyrannical ignorance-producing deity, or the one with magical thinking about the nature and possibilities for the different populations of man?
You’re going to have a civil war over there, or a number of them, if you don’t at least produce a revolt sufficient to change the policy and reverse immigration.
Either that or the country that gave us the modern rule of law state, empiricism, legalism, and constitutionalism and perhas the most dutiful and moral aristocracy in history, is to be erased forever from this earth.
All my love.
CD
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-10 02:25:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921028699992059904
RT @LukeWeinhagen: I want you to have a group.
I want to have a group as well.
I want your group to be different than mine.
I want my gr…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-09 17:16:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920890566406979605
RT @WGthink: I’m uncomfortable with 6.5% of the population responsible for:
90%+ of terror deaths since 2000
75% of terror threats
84% of c…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-09 10:06:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920782357772091614
RT @dr_duchesne: The argument that race is not real is aimed primarily at whites so they are conditioned to dismiss talk of replacement as…
Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 15:22:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920499440802017405