–“The infiltration of education is merely the shield. Lawfare is the sword.”– @ContraFabianist
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 18:07:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662158452230062088
–“The infiltration of education is merely the shield. Lawfare is the sword.”– @ContraFabianist
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 18:07:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662158452230062088
RT @JayMan471: It’s not just that. It’s about anything you can measure (except *maybe* educational attainment–MAYBE). All of it shows zero…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 15:20:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662116476906610688
RT @RobBaumgartner4: @datepsych It boils down to being a good decision maker & predictor, & spouses correlate about 0.60 for years of educa…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-25 14:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661737558760620040
😉 Not criticism. Education:
This kind of response is one of the reasons I often question working in public because it demonstrates people’s tendency for ‘fitting’ – to take any argument that is vaguely analogous to their priors and convert it from causality to analogy and claim it’s still causal. It’s a form of involuntary sophistry, and unfortunately, that sophistry is a product of human cognition’s ‘generalization’ at the expense of causation combined with both abrahamic religion and the platonic branch of european philosophy,
Capitalism(maximization of return on responsibility) and Socialism (maximum return on externalization of responsibility) do in fact correspond to male and female instincts for male status by responsibility for capital by competition and conflict vs female status by access to consumption without responsibiilty for it, to avoid competition and conflict.
I might understand what you intend to say but without the causality (responsibility, status) the meaning is obscured and your argument is easily dismissed (and causes others to dismiss our arguments) – which is why I’m ‘sensitive’ to such things.
What I desperately try to each is first principles. And hyper-capitalization vs hyper-consumption is only causal (not preference) when it originates in the sex differences in risk reward obtained by differences in responsibility: male for polity, and female for her and her offspring alone.
Hope this helps.
Cheers. 😉
Reply addressees: @thedualMan
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 13:08:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661358415212343296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661222785388011521
@PleaseDebunk
The church was a major proponent of education and literacy in science and technology, and many pre-modern Islamic centers of learning had taught science and technology, and pre-modern Judaism produced theoretical works of general scientific and technolgical literacy, and Europeans did not disproportionately innovate in science and technology in the classical, medieval, and modern eras.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 14:25:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661015574196162562
ABRAHAMIC RELIGION = “THEY CAN’T DO IT”
Why didn’t the Church teach literacy as the Romans had?
Why does Islam encorage illiteracy?
Why did Judaism concentrate literacy in internal mysticism?
Why did natural europeans evolve knowledge fastest (realism, naturalism, testmonial truth); christian europeans destroy greco roman knowledge then progress at a snail’s pace – but still develop commerce and trade (trust); jews contribute nothing despite their literacy (mysticism, separatism, parasitism); and islam collect then destroy knowledge ans descend into ignorance and decline(mysticism,aggressive conquest, predation)?
Yet we are constantly saturated by abrahamic superstitious or abrahamic marxist pseudoscientific lies, that originated in those semitic cults?
And why were those cults a revolt against greek reason and heroic excellence, and roman law and administration, and their collective wealth, tech, and trade?
Aristocracy sought an evolutionary leap at the cost of maximization of individual responsibility for the commons. But semitic civilization arose amid tribalism that mandated irresponsibility for commons – and peasants are pefectly happy with subsistence, relative status equality and irresponsibility whenever possible.
“We need to leave the left behind.”
We have failed at every attempt to domesticate non-european peoples. That reason is partly genetic, partly demographic, and partly cultural, and partly one of cost of transformation.
But we cannot domesticate the left, any more than we can deomesticate the parasitic clerisy and peasantry that revolts against it – becuase they simply CAN’T DO IT.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 17:18:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660696630226501638
—“a large and robust negative relationship between length of Muslim rule and literacy. We argue that, contrary to local arrangements set up by Christians, Islamic institutions discouraged the rise of the merchant class, blocking local forms of self-government and thereby…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 06:44:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660537195009114112
Why is Scott Galloway (@profgalloway) the most empirically driven intellectual with the most substantive commentary on the state of the family, despite being in marketing rather than one of the (failed) soft sciences?
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 22:28:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660412180091609088
Quick answer (middle of the night):
Increases pattern recognition. Limits contemplation. Harms attention.
Not clear YET this is bad IF information is true.
Probably is bad if informaiton is false or open to bias selection and interpretation.
Might require education about human differences to correcly interpret the patterns rather than moralize (reductive) them from instincts.
IOW I’m not sure that ‘scanning’ isn’t an evolutionary advancement for processing more information by reliance on less faulty pattern recognition than faulty reason.
I am sure that we are more fulnerable to propaganda suggestion and confusion this way.
So the problem is ‘truth ai’ to limit it.
Reply addressees: @thedualMan
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-15 08:37:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658028761680433153
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658002374177308672
Social media, especially tiktok and Instagram, dating sites, porn, only fans, state support of BLM and Antifa, and tolerance for educational activism against western civilization has gutted any remaining libertarian bias I’ve ever had. 🙁
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 21:02:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657851002664386564