Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • Yes I am generous with my time. But yes you should check Wikipedia before consum

    Yes I am generous with my time. But yes you should check Wikipedia before consuming it. Ok?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-07 13:17:00 UTC

  • The only use of Twitter is announcements. And then banning most responses. You c

    The only use of Twitter is announcements. And then banning most responses. You can’t really engage or learn. Only promote.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 11:45:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/773124924881965056

  • It’s OK. IQ and educational deficiency effects more than half the population.Man

    It’s OK. IQ and educational deficiency effects more than half the population.Manners are a choice tho. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-03 11:55:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772040329402998784

    Reply addressees: @izzvrk @CruisingGallows @Alt_Left

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772039385697005568

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/772039385697005568

  • ONE HOUR LECTURES ON BASIC PROPERTARIAN CONCEPTS I’m trying to make one every da

    ONE HOUR LECTURES ON BASIC PROPERTARIAN CONCEPTS

    I’m trying to make one every day or two. There are not that many basic concepts.

    I can think of the easy one: property in toto. That logically follows from my last one on Morality.

    We have videos on:

    1 – division of perception,

    2 – morality: objective (decidable across differences), group (evolutionary strategy), individual (reproductive strategy)

    3 – cooperation as consolidation of knowledge across perception. division of classes into methods of discourse,

    4 – civilizational strategies based upon geography and demographics.

    5 – and division of civilizations from America to Russia into a distribution of perception – specialization by civilization.

    (I might add that america and russia must now parent europa)

    If I add property, and cover from the origins, then I think those six videos will constitute the equivalent of propertarian ‘social science’.

    Then I can do institutions

    1 – incremental suppression and law

    2 – market government

    3 – the family

    4 – the defensive ‘walls’ (religion(conversion), parasitism (economic), invasion(demographic), and war(violence).

    Between humans and institutions I should create a series on truth.

    I know I need to do one on truth and particularly focus on scope and limits. This fascinates me and it’s one of the most important concepts.

    – honesty and truthfulness.

    – truth as warranties of due diligence

    – the defensive ‘walls’ against deception and error

    – adding the informational commons to protections

    – strict construction of law

    Then lastly I should create

    – demands

    – method of transition

    – instructions for insurrection

    (and I will do that last since I’m gonna get killed for it)

    Thanks for letting me think out loud.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-02 06:14:00 UTC

  • THE TEST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EDUCATION, MONEY, VIOLENCE If you control education, mo

    THE TEST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EDUCATION, MONEY, VIOLENCE

    If you control education, money/credit, and violence, you de-facto rule your tribe. If you do not control education, money/credit, and violence, you are de-facto ruled by others.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-02 04:37:00 UTC

  • I have taught a few classes in my life (or a lot of classes) mostly informally,

    I have taught a few classes in my life (or a lot of classes) mostly informally, and mostly under business (seminar) conditions, but I am far more entertaining than I am in the videos. lol

    I need a white board. ;0

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-01 10:54:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Lex Corvus ♔ (@LexCorvus): Harvard was founded to train Puritan minist

    Retweeted Lex Corvus ♔ (@LexCorvus):

    Harvard was founded to train Puritan ministers, and it never stopped.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-31 12:32:00 UTC

  • SERIOUS QUESTION If I started teaching in 3D-Real-Life, would I find better and

    SERIOUS QUESTION

    If I started teaching in 3D-Real-Life, would I find better and larger real life audiences outside of London or outside of New York?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-30 06:24:00 UTC

  • THE CLASS DIVISIONS OF ACADEMIC LABOR —“Stanford and Chicago GSB have more aca

    THE CLASS DIVISIONS OF ACADEMIC LABOR

    —“Stanford and Chicago GSB have more academic publications that these universities’ economics departments. Two things i don’t like in this trend. 1) Academia persuaded university authorities that to business PhD and MBA math-economics is indispensable. Applied programs people hate this “rigorous” nonsense 2) Too many graduates from mainstream go to teach in business schools.”— Arteom Korotchenya

    Procedural Application (private business and public govt) vs Application(repeatability) vs Basic Research(discovery).

    Three different things. Very few basic research papers of merit in any given year. Many, many applications tested each year, each expanding or reducing empirical content and thereby increasing or decreasing candidacy in law.

    All organizations, intellectual included, operate by class structures, roughly segmented by every ten points of IQ +/- 1/2 St.Dev. And it is the cooperation between these classes that produces the difference between imagination, hypothesis, theory, and law. Those at the bottom test theories tested by application to data and hypothesized by basic research.

    Together we take a restructuring of human understanding, through various tests, until habituated by use, and assumed metaphysically as a natural property of existence.

    So think of the hierarchy as a production cycle, and work within your class, and don’t worry about what other classes do. They CAN only work with the conceptual tools that we give them. And very few of us struggle amidst ridiculous odds to find some innovation that can work its way through that production cycle and end up in our unconscious assumptions about the nature of reality and how we can act to benefit from it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev,

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-29 05:11:00 UTC

  • WHY ARE GOOD PHILOSOPHY GROUPS RARE? ( Everyone, it seems, would like to create

    WHY ARE GOOD PHILOSOPHY GROUPS RARE?

    ( Everyone, it seems, would like to create a quality philosophy group. But the problems faced are these:

    1 – We all have an all-too-high opinion of whatever method of categorization, understanding, and decidability we discover. The Dunning-Kruger effect is more exaggerated in ethics, morality, politics and philosophy than any other discipline – for evolutionary reasons. We advocate for our reproductive strategy (gender, reproductive desirability, social class, and personality traits). We negotiate for and make excuses for our value to others in cooperation in reproduction, production, and commons.

    2 – It takes about six to ten years of studying philosophy, science, economics, and politics, and history to say much of anything at all that isn’t ridiculously uninformed. It takes the study of law to know why philosophy is in general ridiculous. Religion, philosophy and literature are carriers for inspirational ideation: reported preference. economics, law, and history are carriers for demonstrated preference. And social science if it has done anything, has confirmed for us the vast difference between reported preference and demonstrated preference.

    3 – Most philosophical argument seeks to outwit through various means of deception, other attempts to outwit previous forms of deception.

    4 – The difference between cunning (outwitting – immoral), negotiating (trading – ethical ), and deciding (truth – moral ) is a substantial difference in informational content, and symmetry of information used in decisions.

    5 – While public forums are good for learning how to debate the ignorant, incompetent, well-meaning, and those on a productive journey, – and possibly finding fellow travellers – they are actually pretty poor forums for finding and debating with people who possess knowledge, for the simple reason that you must bear a high costs of filtering in exchange for immediacy of discourse.

    (I work in public as an experient and it’s been useful pretty much because through repetition it helps me speak to less sophisticated audiences and find advocates.)

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 08:36:00 UTC