Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MOR

    Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. Do you have any idea what one point of IQ LOSS does for your people? More than almost anything else. Technology not a competitive advantage. GENES ARE THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE. You cannot improve your genes. You can only eliminate the vast number of bad genes – the underclasses.

  • Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MOR

    Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. Do you have any idea what one point of IQ LOSS does for your people? More than almost anything else. Technology not a competitive advantage. GENES ARE THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE. You cannot improve your genes. You can only eliminate the vast number of bad genes – the underclasses.
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27021207_183759032220995_46645011347

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27021207_183759032220995_46645011347

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/27021207_183759032220995_4664501134723953043_o_183759032220995.jpg Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.

    Do you have any idea what one point of IQ LOSS does for your people? More than almost anything else.

    Technology not a competitive advantage.

    GENES ARE THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE.

    You cannot improve your genes. You can only eliminate the vast number of bad genes – the underclasses.Do you have any idea what one point of IQ GAIN does for your people? It does MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.

    Do you have any idea what one point of IQ LOSS does for your people? More than almost anything else.

    Technology not a competitive advantage.

    GENES ARE THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE.

    You cannot improve your genes. You can only eliminate the vast number of bad genes – the underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-22 11:25:00 UTC

  • What Percent Of The Population Of The World Have An Iq Below 100 And Vice Versa?

    THESE ANSWERS ARE NOT QUITE RIGHT. LET’S SEE IF WE CAN IMPROVE THEM:

    We use IQ for two different measures, WITHIN a population, and ACROSS populations.

    The best measure that I know of is to use what we today call 105, which represents approximately the IQ where an individual can repair a machine, or learn by reading instructions, rather than instruction and repetition. (IQ roughly measures the rate of learning, or rather the information requires in order for one to identify constant relations (patterns) of increasing numbers(density) of constant relations(causes)).

    General knowledge will allow you to make more use of your IQ, but it will not improve your neural ability to identify existing and potential constant relations (patterns), with ever decreasing quantity and quality of information.

    If we took the east asian population that is the worlds most homogenous ethnic group that is the world’s most pedomorphically advanced genetic group, that has done the most to kill off its underclasses, (Han/Korean/Japanese) then they would have a distribution of 100.

    If we take any other group we would have a distribution of 100. But when we compare groups to one another some groups decline and others rise. Right? So relative to the UK, Hong Kong has approximately half a standard deviation in IQ (106–108) advantage (at least in non-verbal) IQ. From conversations I’ve had with Lynn, it certainly appears that in anglodom we have lost at least that many IQ points in the past 150 years through asymmetric reproduction in anglo civilization, and as much as 12 points.

    Now, we can then recalculate 100 by the median of the new larger group, OR, we can recalculate each group to a prior demonstrated performance of a 100 individual.

    So we can describe a rolling distribution or we can describe distributions in relation to a fixed capacity.

    So it’s not really true that the world IQ average is 100. As far as I know, the world average IQ relative to the anchor of 100(UK/ENG), is in the 90’s and is getting lower every day due to asymmetric reproduction (dysgenia).

    Sorry but this subject is abused for the purposes of propaganda all the time. IQ matters. Eery point of median IQ lost in population has a tremendous cost, because langauge, norms, and institutions must exist for the median.

    As a rule of thumb. Every person under 95 is six times as costly as the productivity of every person over 105. Ergo the most benefit that any people can provide is actually not education or employment but reduction of the reproduction of the underclasses. And by underclasses the hard number is under 105.

    Uncomfortable truths are uncomfortable for a reason. They deprive us of presumed discounts.

    https://www.quora.com/What-percent-of-the-population-of-the-world-have-an-IQ-below-100-and-vice-versa

  • I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using posit

    I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using positional names, then most of this mysticism would disappear.

  • I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using posit

    I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using positional names, then most of this mysticism would disappear.

  • I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using posit

    I swear to god that if we taught math as the science of measurement, using positional names, then most of this mysticism would disappear.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 21:16:00 UTC

  • You know, you can learn a lot playing verbal tennis with me. Most people do. Or.

    You know, you can learn a lot playing verbal tennis with me. Most people do. Or… well, most people with more than room temperature IQ’s do…. Humor is an exceptional means of educating those lacking agency to pursue truth alone.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 01:24:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954525064686456832

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954522808125603840

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954522808125603840

  • Operational Economics Is A Minimum Necessary Skill For Participation In Post-Medieval Discourse.

    If you don’t understand operational economics, meaning opportunities, incentives and the equilibration of those opportunities as we act on them, then you are no different in your deficiencies from a late medieval rationalist ignorant of empiricism. Economics is counter-intuitive, in large part because it exposes the fallacies of ethical, moral, and ‘good’ pretenses and creates a measurable means testing ethical and moral thoughts, words, and actions. We are, and we act, as extensions of the physical universe, and we do so by exactly the same laws, and language just is a polite means of negotiating with others. The advantage intelligence, of memory, of the ability to cooperate, and of the ability to live for three weeks without food, is that we can use fairly long periods to plan short medium and long term means of expending small amounts of energy as individuals, and together as groups, to capture calories necessary to support that fairly expensive neurological system. We are simply a better means of capturing, converting, and concentrating energy in a universe of perpetual entropy, because our memories allow us to predict the future, and act to seize the opportunity or alter it and create it or seize the risk and alter ir. At some point humans must stop seeking discounts (cunning in the short term ) and produce returns ( productivity through invention). And we seem to covet a steady state, yet never wish to pay for the long investments that make the great leaps in wealth possible. Because they are only possible when an elite minority possesses both technological advantage AND an internal demand to create markets that produce returns, rather than predations that prevent them in exchange for current and near term signal and consumption.

  • OPERATIONAL ECONOMICS IS A MINIMUM NECESSARY SKILL FOR PARTICIPATION IN POST-MED

    OPERATIONAL ECONOMICS IS A MINIMUM NECESSARY SKILL FOR PARTICIPATION IN POST-MEDIEVAL DISCOURSE.

    If you don’t understand operational economics, meaning opportunities, incentives and the equilibration of those opportunities as we act on them, then you are no different in your deficiencies from a late medieval rationalist ignorant of empiricism.

    Economics is counter-intuitive, in large part because it exposes the fallacies of ethical, moral, and ‘good’ pretenses and creates a measurable means testing ethical and moral thoughts, words, and actions.

    We are, and we act, as extensions of the physical universe, and we do so by exactly the same laws, and language just is a polite means of negotiating with others.

    The advantage intelligence, of memory, of the ability to cooperate, and of the ability to live for three weeks without food, is that we can use fairly long periods to plan short medium and long term means of expending small amounts of energy as individuals, and together as groups, to capture calories necessary to support that fairly expensive neurological system.

    We are simply a better means of capturing, converting, and concentrating energy in a universe of perpetual entropy, because our memories allow us to predict the future, and act to seize the opportunity or alter it and create it or seize the risk and alter ir.

    At some point humans must stop seeking discounts (cunning in the short term ) and produce returns ( productivity through invention).

    And we seem to covet a steady state, yet never wish to pay for the long investments that make the great leaps in wealth possible.

    Because they are only possible when an elite minority possesses both technological advantage AND an internal demand to create markets that produce returns, rather than predations that prevent them in exchange for current and near term signal and consumption.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 07:42:00 UTC